Nikon Coolpix P310 vs. Nikon Coolpix S9700: A Thorough Comparison for Discerning Photographers

The compact camera market continues to evolve, presenting photography enthusiasts with a multitude of choices that promise portability paired with powerful optics. Two notable contenders in Nikon’s small sensor line-up - the Nikon Coolpix P310 and the Nikon Coolpix S9700 - offer distinct advantages predicated on different priorities: classic compact elegance versus superzoom versatility. Having rigorously tested these models across varied photography scenarios, this detailed comparison examines their capabilities from sensor performance to handling, and contextualizes their strengths for diverse photographic disciplines.

Design, Ergonomics, and Build: Assessing Handling and Portability

The first tactile impression often shapes the overall user experience. The Nikon P310 measures a relatively compact 103 x 58 x 32 mm and weighs 194 grams, favoring a pocketable form factor without imposing excessive bulk. The S9700, by contrast, is slightly larger and heavier at 110 x 64 x 35 mm and 232 grams, reflecting the inclusion of a much larger zoom lens.

Both cameras employ compact, ergonomic designs typical for point-and-shoots but differ notably in handling sophistication:

• Nikon P310: Offers a comfortably contoured body conducive to one-handed operation. Its fixed lens position and comparatively wider grip area lend itself to greater manual control comfort and minimize shake during shooting. Unfortunately, the absence of a viewfinder mandates reliance on the rear screen.

• Nikon S9700: Larger lens barrel and zoom mechanism necessitate a bulkier grip, impacting discreet handling especially during street or travel photography. The is no electronic viewfinder; thus, its design emphasizes screen-based composition.

The ergonomics reflect divergent user priorities: P310’s more compact form benefits photographers prioritizing portability and tactile chamber control, while S9700 favors users needing extended reach and compositional flexibility.

The top-plate controls reveal a minimalist but functional approach. The P310 has a well-positioned mode dial and a straightforward shutter release setup favoring quick mode switches and manual exposure operation. The S9700’s longer lens necessitates slightly repositioned controls; still, both cameras maintain easy-to-understand layouts that reduce learning curve.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Foundation of Image Capture

At the core of both cameras lies a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor sized 6.17 x 4.55 mm, boasting a sensor area of 28.07 mm² and resolving images at 16 megapixels (4608×3456). This sensor size is common among compact cameras, striking a balance between small form factors and acceptable image resolution.

However, despite identical sensor size and resolution on paper, real-world imaging performance diverges due to differences in lens aperture range, ISO sensitivity, and image processing pipelines.

ISO Sensitivity and Noise Performance

• Nikon P310: Native ISO range from 100 to 3200 with no extended ISO. In practice, the sensor performs reasonably well up to ISO 800, beyond which noise becomes increasingly apparent. This sensitivity limitation is expected given the older generation sensor and the lens aperture range (F1.8–4.9), which favors lower light capture at wider angles.

• Nikon S9700: Extends ISO sensitivity from 125 to 6400 native, theoretically offering greater low-light flexibility. However, the narrower aperture at telephoto (F3.7–6.4) reduces incoming light, effectively negating high ISO advantages when zoomed in. The amplified ISO leads to higher noise levels, which constrains usability at sensitivities above ISO 800 for most print sizes.

Color Depth and Dynamic Range

Neither camera has been independently scored by DxOMark; nevertheless, the usage of similar BSI-CMOS technology suggests comparable color depth capabilities. Both employ an anti-aliasing filter which slightly softens fine image details but helps reduce moiré artifacts.

Dynamic range is moderately limited with some tendency to clip highlights under high-contrast conditions, indicative of compact sensor constraints. Advanced users should note these limitations when shooting scenes with extreme tonal variations.

Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed in Varied Scenarios

Autofocus performance fundamentally impacts the ability to capture decisive moments. Both cameras utilize contrast-detection autofocus aided by 99 focus points and face detection algorithms.

• Nikon P310 employs continuous autofocus (albeit limited), center-weighted metering, and face detection, supporting manual focus adjustments via dedicated control. It is noteworthy that continuous auto-focus is somewhat constrained in responsiveness due to older processing electronics but still reliable in controlled lighting.

• Nikon S9700 omits true continuous autofocus; it supports single and tracking AF modes with face detection. Manual focus is not supported, limiting granular control. However, tracking AF is relatively robust for a compact, supporting video use-cases better.

Neither camera offers phase-detection autofocus which typically grants superior speed and accuracy in DSLRs or mirrorless cameras.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Optical Flexibility and Application

The primary optical distinction lies in the zoom range and maximum aperture:

• Nikon P310: Fixed 24-100 mm (equivalent) zoom with bright maximum aperture of F1.8-4.9. The wide aperture at the short end facilitates shallow depth-of-field effects useful for portraits and low-light shooting, as well as providing greater creative flexibility.

• Nikon S9700: Smallest focal length slightly narrower at 25 mm, but telephoto reach extends to 750 mm equivalent - a substantial 30x zoom range. The tradeoff is a much narrower maximum aperture of F3.7-6.4, limiting background separation and low-light capacity, especially at longer focal lengths.

This difference dictates distinct usage profiles:

• The P310 excels for portraits, street, macro, and controlled lighting scenarios where a brighter aperture benefits image quality and artistic shallow depth of field.

• The S9700 suits wildlife, travel, and sports photography that demands significant zoom without the weight and complexity of interchangeable lens cameras.

Continuous Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Capturing Motion

Rapid frame rates contribute strongly to sports, wildlife, and action photography effectiveness.

• Nikon P310: Max continuous shooting of 6 fps with shutter speeds ranging from 30s to 1/8000s. The high maximum shutter speed is impressive for a compact camera and aids in freezing fast motion under bright conditions, although buffer depth and sustained shooting time are limited.

• Nikon S9700: Slightly faster continuous shooting at 7 fps but offers a more restricted shutter speed range from 8s to 1/2000s. The slower maximum shutter speed lessens its ability to freeze extremely rapid motion effectively.

Thus, the P310 provides superior shutter control and burst capabilities, advantageous for shooting dynamic subjects requiring precise exposure and motion stopping.

Image Stabilization and Macro Capabilities: Sharpening and Close-Up Versatility

Both cameras incorporate optical image stabilization, essential to mitigate camera shake at longer focal lengths or slower shutter speeds:

• The P310’s stabilization pairs with a wider aperture lens, enabling effective macro shooting from as close as 2 cm from the front element. Its manual focus and macro capabilities allow precision focusing for close-up subjects, beneficial for nature and product photography.

• The S9700 can focus down to 1 cm, an impressively close focusing distance augmented by the extended zoom, allowing detailed macro compositions with substantial background compression. Although manual focus is absent, stabilization helps achieve sharp handheld close-ups.

Video Recording Capabilities: Quality and Flexibility

For photographers interested in hybrid stills and video use, these cameras offer Full HD video recording but with some differences.

• Nikon P310: Captures Full HD 1080p video at 30fps with MPEG-4 and H.264 compression formats. Frame rate options are limited and lack higher frame rate slow-motion modes. No external microphone input is available, limiting audio quality controls.

• Nikon S9700: Offers more versatile video support - up to 1080p either at 30/25 fps or interlaced 60/50 fps formats, plus additional lower resolutions supporting high frame rate capture (up to 240 fps at 320x240). This allows for creative slow-motion effects. However, similarly no microphone input or headphone jack exists.

Neither camera supports 4K video or advanced exposure controls during filming, reflecting their comparative age and target market.

LCD Screen and Viewfinder: Composition and Feedback

Composition relies heavily on display quality and usability:

Both cameras feature fixed 3.0-inch TFT LCDs with 921k-dot resolution and anti-reflection coatings - consistent across compact cameras of their generation. Unfortunately:

• Neither camera includes a built-in electronic or optical viewfinder, a significant limitation in bright outdoor light conditions necessitating reliance on the screen.

• Lack of touchscreen functionality reduces quick focus and menu navigation, particularly relevant for modern users accustomed to touch interfaces.

From experience, the fixed angle screen on both models limits framing flexibility, especially when shooting at low or high angles.

Battery Life and Storage: Endurance and Workflow Practicality

• The P310 uses an EN-EL12 battery rated for approximately 230 shots per charge, modest for travel or extended sessions, necessitating spare batteries for all-day use.

• The S9700 offers an improved ~300 shot battery life on the same battery model, a tangible advantage for travel or event shooting requiring longer operational periods without recharge.

Both cameras utilize SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots for expandable storage - industry standard - with USB 2.0 and HDMI ports supporting data transfer and playback on external displays.

Notably, the absence of wireless connectivity on the P310 contrasts with the S9700’s built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, enhancing workflow efficiency and geotagging capabilities.

Weather Resistance, Durability, and Build Quality

Neither camera features environmental sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. Both are designed as consumer-grade compacts not intended for harsh outdoor conditions without protective measures. Users seeking robust build quality for professional or adventure use will need to consider third-party protective accessories or alternative models.

Pricing and Value Proposition: Cost vs Capability

• The Nikon P310’s launch price around $700 positioned it as a premium compact with relatively bright optics suitable for enthusiasts seeking manual control and image quality in a pocketable body.

• The Nikon S9700 retailed closer to $350, appealing as an affordable superzoom compact with convenient features like GPS and Wi-Fi that facilitate travel photography.

Given current market availability, both models have been superseded by newer cameras, which deliver enhanced sensors, improved autofocus systems, and advanced video options.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

To contextualize the specifications and technical tests, real-world shooting across major photography types provides practical insights:

Nikon P310 front Nikon P310 screen back Nikon S9700 front Nikon S9700 screen back

Portrait Photography

• Nikon P310: Wide aperture of F1.8 at 24 mm equivalent offers better subject-background separation and softer bokeh, enhancing skin tone rendition and eye detection autofocus efficacy. Manual exposure modes and face detection allow creative control, but fixed focal range restricts framing flexibility.

• Nikon S9700: Telephoto focal length benefits compressed facial features at longer zoom, but narrower apertures limit depth of field control and low light shooting. Face detection exists but is less effective due to slower AF and smaller aperture.

Landscape Photography

Both struggle with dynamic range and fine detail compared to larger sensor cameras.

• The P310’s lower maximum ISO and faster lens help reduce noise in shadow areas.

• The S9700 exacerbates noise and diffraction at zoom telephoto lengths but extends compositional versatility.

Both lack weather sealing, limiting rough weather use.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

• S9700’s 30x zoom extends reach to subjects distant in the wild or on sporting fields, critical for these genres.

• The P310 falls short due to zoom constraints, though it offers better shutter speed range (up to 1/8000 s) aiding motion freezing.

Autofocus lacks dedicated phase-detect sensors, limiting tracking performance in fast action scenarios for both.

Street Photography

• P310’s smaller size and brighter lens provide quicker, more discreet shooting in urban environments versus the bulkier S9700.

• S9700’s zoom can be intrusive or slower to operate; however, Wi-Fi and GPS can assist in location-tagged shooting.

Macro Photography

• Both offer close focusing distances (P310 at 2 cm, S9700 at 1 cm) with optical stabilization, but the P310’s manual focus aids precision.

Night and Astro Photography

• Limited ISO sensitivity and sensor size restrict astrophotography; however, the P310’s faster lens and longer shutter speeds (to 30s) offer marginal advantages.

Video Recording

• The S9700 offers more versatile frame rates and slow-motion capture modes, appealing to casual video users.

• Neither camera supports external audio inputs, limiting professional video work.

Travel Photography

• S9700 benefits from longer zoom range, Wi-Fi, GPS, and longer battery life, favoring comprehensive travel documentation.

• P310 is more portable, better for genuine pocketability.

Professional Use

Given the lack of RAW support, limited processing controls, and modest AF performance, neither model is advised for demanding professional workflows. Their utility lies in casual, enthusiast, or specialized secondary camera roles.

Summary and Recommendations

Who Should Choose Nikon Coolpix P310?

• Enthusiasts valuing compactness, manual exposure controls, and a brighter lens for portraits and low light shooting.
• Photographers who prefer tactile controls, moderate zoom, and occasional macro shooting.
• Users prioritizing image quality over zoom reach in a pocket-appropriate camera.

Who Should Opt for Nikon Coolpix S9700?

• Travelers and wildlife photographers needing extensive zoom reach without the burden of interchangeable lenses.
• Users wanting built-in Wi-Fi and GPS for image sharing and geolocation tagging.
• Casual video shooters appreciating versatile recording modes and slow-motion capture.

Practical Considerations

Both models demand compromises: the P310’s limited zoom and battery life versus the S9700’s reduced aperture at telephoto and bulkier ergonomics. Neither camera suits professionals requiring high dynamic range, RAW file output, or advanced autofocus tracking.

Final Thoughts

In dissecting the Nikon P310 and S9700, it is evident that each serves distinct niches within the small sensor compact camera segment. The P310 excels through a brighter lens and manual controls favoring image quality and creative leverage, while the S9700 attracts users needing powerful zooming ability augmented by wireless features. Careful consideration of your photographic preferences, prioritized genres, and workflow requirements will guide the choice between these two capable but differently focused compacts.

For photographers seeking an affordable, all-around zoom, the S9700 offers very good value. For those emphasizing image quality, low light, and more hands-on operation, the P310 remains a valid option despite its age.

As always, upgrading to mirrorless or DSLR platforms will unlock far superior performance, but within the compact niche, these Nikons remain practical solutions tailored to particular photographic aspirations.