Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
![Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-620.jpg)
![Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-620-UZ/Olympus-SP-620-UZ-front.jpg)
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Released January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The E-620 was revealed 3 years prior to the SP-620 UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-620 scores vs the SP-620 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-620 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-620
SP-620 UZ | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-620 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-620 versus the SP-620 UZ.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and SP-620 UZ is 71 and 78 respectively.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and SP-620 UZ.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-620-vs-Olympus-SP-620-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $799 | $199 |