Nikon P520 vs Sony A58: Hands-On Expert Comparison for Discerning Photographers

When stepping into the arena of cameras that bridge the gap between casual shooters and serious enthusiasts, two models from 2013 often pop up in conversation: the Nikon Coolpix P520 and the Sony SLT-A58. Though launched within the same year frame and targeting somewhat different segments, these cameras frequently appear side-by-side in buyers’ lists - especially from budget-conscious folks hunting for versatile gear that punches above its weight.

Having spent countless hours with each, evaluating them through industry-standard tests and real-world shooting scenarios, I’m excited to take you through an in-depth, honest comparison. We’ll unpack how these two stack up across the entire photographic spectrum - portrait, landscape, wildlife, video, and more - while consistently weighing their practical strengths and tradeoffs for various user types.

Let’s get into the nitty-gritty, but with a friendly tone and no technobabble overload. Trust me, as someone who’s churned through thousands of camera reviews over 15+ years, this is the no-nonsense, down-to-earth guide you want before making that buy.

Getting a Feel: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

Before even clicking a button, how a camera feels in your hands heavily influences your shooting enjoyment and control precision over time.

Nikon P520: This bridge style camera sports a robust, SLR-like body that's relatively chunky but well balanced thanks to its longer zoom lens. The physical dimensions of 125x84x102 mm and a weight of about 550g place it squarely in the mid-weight club. The grip size is generous, fully capable of accommodating larger hands comfortably, though if you’re a cheapskate with smaller paws, you might find it a bit bulky for casual street shooting or all-day travel.

Sony A58: In contrast, the A58 feels noticeably more compact and slightly lighter at 492g with dimensions 129x95x78 mm. The ergonomics here lean more traditional DSLR-style but with a modern compactness that works well in various grips. Its smaller lens mount and APS-C sensor contribute to this. The controls layout is intuitive, and the ‘clubs for thumbs’ benefit from a bit more visibility and tactile feedback.

From a control standpoint, the Sony has dedicated dials and a more DSLR-typical cluster - perfect for quick manual mode adjustments. The Nikon favors a simplified top plate with fewer physical dials but incorporates a fully articulated 3.2-inch TFT LCD screen that excels in live view and framing tough angles (more on that screen soon).

Ergonomics verdict: For those prioritizing comfort and traditional exposure control, the Sony A58 wins. For enthusiasts who value flexible shooting angles and a sizable zoom lens in one package, Nikon’s P520 delivers a more substantial handfeel.

Sensor Size and Image Quality Potential

This is genuinely the elephant in the room - the sensor governs most image quality aspects, from resolution to noise handling and dynamic range.

Sony A58: Equipped with an APS-C CMOS sensor (23.2 x 15.4 mm), the Sony offers significantly more pixel real estate and a larger sensor area - about 348 mm² versus the Nikon’s 28.46 mm². The 20MP resolution (5456 x 3632 pixels) supports detailed, high-quality images with less noise, especially beneficial in low light. Sony designed it for photographers craving DSLR-level image quality in an entry-level package. Additionally, the sensor supports 14-bit RAW shooting - a godsend for those wanting maximum editing flexibility.

Nikon P520: On the opposite end, the P520’s small 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor is a fixed component typical of compact superzooms. With 18MP resolution (4896 x 3672 pixels), it achieves respectable detail under good lighting but inherently will struggle with noise at higher ISO levels due to the tiny sensor size (about a tenth of APS-C’s area). The lack of RAW support also restricts post-processing flexibility.

Practical impact: For portraiture, landscapes, and anything requiring fine image quality, the Sony’s sensor trounces the Nikon’s. The Nikon, however, shines in scenarios emphasizing zoom reach rather than ultimate image fidelity.

The Viewfinder and LCD Experience

How you see and compose images affects framing accuracy and shooting ease - particularly in bright outdoor conditions or creative angles.

Nikon P520: Features a 3.2-inch fully articulated TFT LCD with an anti-reflective coating and a resolution of 921k dots. Articulation extends to a full swivel, which is fantastic for waist-level or overhead shots - perfect for creative travel or nature photography. The camera relies on an electronic viewfinder (EVF), but the specs for resolution and coverage are not prominently advertised, hinting at a basic implementation.

Sony A58: Comes with a smaller 2.7-inch tilting LCD screen, lower in resolution (460k dots) compared to Nikon’s. The real star is its high-resolution, eye-level EVF (1440k dots) with 100% coverage and 0.65x magnification, delivering a sharp, true-to-life viewing experience that DSLR shooters will appreciate. Eye-level EVFs offer steadier shooting and less glare than LCDs, especially in dynamic scenes.

In the field: The Nikon’s articulated LCD is tremendously practical for video work and awkward angles, whereas the Sony’s bright, high-res EVF is a boon for traditional DSLR-style shooting.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed – The Action Factor

Whether you’re shooting a competitive sporting event, wildlife, or fleeting street moments, autofocus capability and burst speed define how many good shots you snag.

Sony A58: Sports a hybrid autofocus system combining 15 phase-detection points (including 3 cross-type) with contrast detection. It supports continuous autofocus tracking, face detection, and various AF areas - all of which make subject acquisition and tracking reliable. Burst shooting hits up to 8 frames per second, impressive for this price tier and sensor size, perfect for sports or wildlife sequences.

Nikon P520: Utilizes a simpler contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points and lacks continuous AF tracking. Single autofocus and manual focus modes are present, but the responsiveness and accuracy can falter in fast-paced shooting. It maxes out at 7 frames per second burst, close numerically to Sony but without the focus tracking support to benefit.

Real-world takeaway: The Sony A58 dominates if your photography demands fast, reliable autofocus. The Nikon struggles outside of static scenes.

Lens System and Zoom Versatility

We can’t talk about these cameras without discussing their lenses, since the Nikon has a fixed zoom and the Sony is interchangeable.

Nikon P520: Packs a crazy 24–1000 mm equivalent zoom lens (41.7x optical zoom). This massive focal range covers wide landscapes to extreme telephoto wildlife or sports shots without changing lenses. Aperture ranges from f/3.0 wide open to f/5.9 at the longest end. Optical image stabilization is included, crucial for handheld shooting at long focal lengths.

Sony A58: Uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount (A-mount) with access to a broad ecosystem of over 143 compatible lenses, including affordable primes, zooms, and recommended lenses tailored to various genres. Though you have to buy lenses separately, this flexibility lets you optimize your gear for your specific style - whether portrait primes, fast telephotos, or macro lenses. The stock kits typically cover 18-55mm or 55-200mm equivalents.

In a nutshell: Nikon is a jack-of-all-trades with all-in-one zoom convenience; Sony grants you the creativity and image quality benefits of specialized glass but requires incremental investment.

Build Quality and Weatherproofing

Both cameras come from a budget-conscious era and segment, so don’t expect magnesium alloy chassis or professional weather sealing.

• Nikon P520: Made with polycarbonate, offers no weather sealing, waterproofing, or shockproofing. The build is sturdy for a bridge camera but best used with care in harsh conditions.

• Sony A58: Also plastic-centric with no weather sealing or ruggedization but carries a slightly more robust DSLR form factor. It feels solid for everyday use.

Neither camera is suited for professional level environmental abuse, so amateur enthusiasts should consider protective gear or shelter when working in adverse weather.

Battery Life and Storage

Shooting longevity can make or break outings, especially when you’re traveling or away from power.

• Sony A58: Reports an excellent battery life of approximately 690 shots per charge (approximate manufacturer rating), benefiting from an efficient sensor and lower screen power usage. Uses the NP-FM500H battery, fairly easy to find and reasonably priced.

• Nikon P520: Clocked at around 200 shots per battery, which is on the lower side due to the power-hungry zoom lens and articulated LCD. Packs an EN-EL5 battery with decent availability.

Storage-wise, both rely on a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, but the Sony also supports Memory Stick variants, useful for users with existing Sony gear.

Long story short: If you travel keenly or shoot long events, the Sony wins in battery endurance hands down.

Connectivity and Extras

• Nikon P520: Offers built-in GPS for geotagging - a nice touch for travel and landscape photographers who want automatic location stamping. Wireless connectivity is optional via external accessories. HDMI output is present, but no USB port.

• Sony A58: Lacks GPS, but supports Eye-Fi card connectivity for wireless transfer (a bit dated now). USB 2.0 port and HDMI out are included. Also features an external microphone jack, enhancing video recording flexibility.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p video, but nuances differentiate their video usability.

• Nikon P520: Delivers Full HD at 30fps with stereo sound but lacks external mic input limiting audio control. The fully articulated screen helps tremendously with handheld video or vlogging.

• Sony A58: Also captures 1080p video but offers AVCHD and MPEG-4 codecs and supports an external microphone, elevating audio quality for serious shooters. Screen tilts but does not fully articulate. The hybrid autofocus supports continuous AF during video recording, a clear advantage.

How They Perform Across Popular Photography Genres

Let’s break down their suitability in key photography styles.

Sample Images and Real-World Testing

I captured diverse scenes side-by-side to illustrate their differences.

Nikon P520 front Nikon P520 screen back Sony A58 front Sony A58 screen back

Notice the Sony’s superior sharpness, cleaner shadows, and color fidelity in lower light, plus smoother bokeh transitions. Nikon’s zoom pulls distant subjects impressively but softness and noise creep in past 400mm equivalent lengths.

Overall Performance Scores

Industry benchmarking data adds quantitative flavor.

Sony A58 ranks higher overall for image quality, AF, and versatility, while Nikon P520 scores better in zoom range and articulation. Neither is a top scorer in build or video.

Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown

Here’s how they rate per photographic discipline (out of 10):

• Sony dominates landscapes, portraits, sports, and low-light needs.
• Nikon’s strong suit remains wildlife via superzoom and video flexibility.

The Final Word: Which One Should You Buy?

If you want:

• An all-in-one powerful zoom with straightforward shooting and video flexibility, especially for casual wildlife or travel shots without investing in multiple lenses - go Nikon P520. It’s a solid choice for photographers who prioritize reach, articulated screen usefulness, and GPS tagging at a relatively low price (~$380).

• A camera with DSLR-style control, better image quality, excellent autofocus, long battery life, and access to a massive lens ecosystem aiming for creative maturity across genres - choose Sony A58. Although it’s pricier (~$645), it’s a capable companion for enthusiasts stepping up in skill and intent to produce pro-quality photos and video.

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Parting Tips From the Field

• Test the cameras yourself if possible - handling and vision often clinch the deal.
• Think long-term: investing in Sony’s lens system can pay back with greater creative freedom.
• The Nikon shines if you hate carrying extra gear and demand zoom reach without lens fuss.
• For video-heavy creators, Sony’s mic input and AF tracking will save headaches.
• Keep in mind that these cameras are older models; modern alternatives might offer better specs for similar money if you have flexibility.

In sum, the Nikon Coolpix P520 is a compelling all-rounder for zoom lovers who prize simplicity and reach, while the Sony SLT-A58 is the more well-rounded DSLR-style contender with robust imaging and manual control benefits that scale well with skill.

I hope this hands-on exploration powers you toward the right choice for your photographic adventures! As always, happy shooting and keep those creative lenses focused.

If you found this comparison helpful, feel free to share it with fellow photo enthusiasts navigating the jungle of camera options.