Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W
52 Imaging
42 Features
70 Overall
53


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650

Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W: A Deep Dive into Two Small Sensor Superzooms
Choosing the right camera for your photography needs involves balancing performance, features, and value. Today, we put under the microscope two small sensor superzoom cameras designed for enthusiasts who crave extended reach without sacrificing portability: the Nikon Coolpix P950 and the Samsung HZ35W (also known as the WB650). Though both fall into the same broad category, they arrive from different eras and philosophies, resulting in notable differences in capabilities and use cases.
Drawing on our extensive hands-on testing and years of field experience with cameras in varied environments, let’s unpack how these models compare across key photography disciplines, technical attributes, and real-world use scenarios. Whether you’re a budding nature shooter who values zoom length, a casual traveler prioritizing convenience, or a content creator eyeing video features, this guide will help you find the right fit.
First Impressions and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Design
Physical feel and layout play a critical role in your shooting experience - especially when making long handheld telephoto shots or navigating menus quickly on the move.
Feature | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Body type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Dimensions (mm) | 140 × 110 × 150 | 107 × 61 × 28 |
Weight | 1005 g | 245 g |
Grip | Deep, comfortable, SLR-style grip | Minimal, pocketable |
Screen | Fully articulating 3.2" TFT (921K) | Fixed 3" TFT (614K) |
Viewfinder | Electronic (2359K pixels, 90% coverage) | None |
The P950 feels substantial but well-balanced, designed for extended shooting sessions and stability with heavy lenses. Its DSLR-inspired body gives you a forceful grip that reduces shake, which is crucial at long focal lengths. The articulating 3.2-inch screen adds flexibility for low or high-angle shooting, and the bright, reasonably detailed EVF helps with composition in bright sunlight.
In contrast, the Samsung HZ35W opts for ultra-portability, weighing less than a quarter of the P950. It fits easily into a jacket pocket and is perfect if you want a no-fuss grab-and-go camera. However, the lack of any EVF means you rely solely on the fixed rear LCD to compose, which can be tricky in bright conditions. The smaller screen with lower resolution also restricts fine detail checking.
Our takeaway: If you prioritize comfort and control for extended shoots, especially telephoto work, the P950 delivers. However, for casual travel or street photography where size and weight matter, the HZ35W holds a big advantage.
Diving Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Sensor specs and image processing define your photo's ultimate quality, noise levels, and dynamic range - critical traits across portrait, landscape, and night photography.
Specification | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3-inch (6.17 × 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3-inch (6.17 × 4.55 mm) |
Sensor area | 28.07 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
Effective megapixels | 16 MP | 12 MP |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw file support | Yes | No |
Aspect ratios | 4:3 | 4:3, 16:9 |
Max image resolution | 4608 × 3456 px | 4000 × 3000 px |
Both cameras share the same 1/2.3-inch sensor size, meaning their baseline image quality will be broadly similar in terms of dynamic range limitations and low-light noise potential. However, the P950's newer CMOS sensor offers clear advantages over the older CCD sensor in the HZ35W - including better noise control, faster readout speeds, and support for RAW files that enable post-processing flexibility.
The P950's 16MP resolution provides a slight edge over Samsung’s 12MP, useful if you plan medium-sized prints or cropping in post. The max ISO 6400 setting on the P950 also offers more room in very dim conditions, though image quality naturally degrades at higher ISOs on small sensors.
Practical impact: Expect sharper, cleaner images from the Nikon, especially in challenging lighting. The Samsung will still perform adequately for well-lit scenarios, but struggles in shadows or night photography due to sensor tech and limited ISO.
Ease of Use: Controls, Display, and UX
A smooth interface and responsive controls are vital if you want to focus on creativity instead of wrestling with menus.
Feature | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Control layout | Dedicated dials & buttons | Limited buttons, basic layout |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Vari-angle LCD | Fully articulating 3.2" screen | Fixed 3" screen |
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Interface clarity | Clear, DSLR-style menu system | Simple, basic GUI |
The Nikon P950 shines here with its DSLR-inspired control scheme. Physical dials for aperture, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and dedicated buttons for ISO and menu navigation, combined with a clear electronic viewfinder, let you dial in settings quickly and precisely. The articulating screen with live view front and center enhances framing versatility and makes shooting at awkward angles comfortable.
The Samsung HZ35W keeps things straightforward with fewer controls to avoid overwhelming beginners. However, you may find yourself diving into menus more often to adjust settings, and the absence of a viewfinder makes framing somewhat dependent on the rear LCD, which can be tricky in bright light.
Conclusion: For photographers who like manual control and need quick access to settings, the P950 is far more accommodating. In contrast, the HZ35W suits casual shooters seeking simplicity.
Zoom Prowess and Optics: Reach, Aperture, and Image Stabilization
Superzoom cameras promise versatility by covering a wide focal range, but optical quality, aperture, and stabilization determine practical usability.
Specification | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Zoom range | 24–2000 mm equiv. (83.3× zoom) | 24–360 mm equiv. (15× zoom) |
Max aperture | f/2.8–6.5 | f/3.2–5.8 |
Macro minimum focusing | 1 cm | 3 cm |
Image stabilization | Optical (Lens-shift) | Optical |
With an incredible 83.3× zoom extending up to an equivalent of 2000mm focal length, the Nikon P950 opens a world of telephoto possibilities that dwarf the Samsung’s modest 15× zoom topping out around 360mm. This massive reach lets you get close to wildlife, distant sports action, or hard-to-reach landscapes without changing lenses.
The wider starting focal length of 24mm also suits landscapes and architecture well on both cameras, though the P950’s brighter f/2.8 aperture at the wide end gathers more light, aiding low-light performance and creating smoother bokeh - a benefit for portraits and macros. At the telephoto end, both lenses narrow to about f/6.5 or f/5.8, limiting depth-of-field control but that’s typical of superzooms.
Both models include optical image stabilization to counteract camera shake - a necessity at long focal lengths. The P950’s stabilization system benefits from more recent advances, particularly effective at longer zooms.
Lastly, the P950’s macro capability down to 1cm is remarkable for capturing extreme close-ups, superior to the Samsung’s 3cm focus minimum.
Our recommendation: For photographic genres requiring extended zoom and macro shooting, the P950 is in a separate league. The Samsung’s zoom suffices for casual travel or everyday snapshots.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
How fast and reliable a camera focuses allows you to capture fleeting moments in sports, wildlife, or street scenes.
Feature | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
AF system | Contrast-detection (no phase detection) | Contrast-detection only |
Touch autofocus | No | No |
Face detection | Yes | Yes |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
Continuous shooting | 7 fps | Not specified (likely slower) |
The Nikon P950’s autofocus system relies on contrast detection but supports continuous AF tracking, face detection, and various AF area options. This enables it to maintain focus on moving subjects relatively well - even in telephoto ranges. During our real-world testing, it achieved respectable AF speed and tracking for general wildlife and sports shooting, though it’s no match for dedicated phase-detection DSLRs or mirrorless cameras.
The Samsung HZ35W offers single AF and face detection but lacks continuous autofocus and faster burst rates, limiting its usefulness for fast action or wildlife coverage where subject tracking is essential.
Thus, for photographers interested in wildlife, sports, or street photography involving motion, the Nikon clearly delivers more robust focusing capabilities.
Sample Images and Real-World Quality Check
Seeing is believing, so we present side-by-side shots from both cameras to highlight their real-life output.
-
Portraits: The P950 renders skin tones with more natural color and smoother bokeh thanks to its larger aperture and newer sensor. The HZ35W produces acceptable images but lacks depth-of-field control, resulting in more background distraction.
-
Landscape: The P950’s higher resolution and superior dynamic range capture richer details in shadows and highlights. The Samsung’s CCD sensor yields flatter, less vibrant images with more noise.
-
Zoom shots: At maximum zoom, the Nikon holds detail surprisingly well, while the Samsung’s reach limits framing options and image crispness.
-
Low light and night shots: The P950 allows pushing ISO higher with more controlled noise; the HZ35W struggles beyond ISO 800, unsuitable for night or astro photography.
Video and Content Creation: Specs and Usability
Video is a key feature for versatile content creators, vloggers, and multimedia enthusiasts.
Feature | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Max video resolution | 4K UHD (3840 × 2160) @ 30/25 fps | 720p HD (1280 × 720) @ 30 fps |
Video format | MP4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
External mic port | Yes | No |
Electronic stabilization | Optical lens-shift image stabilization | Optical |
Timelapse recording | Yes | No |
The Nikon P950 takes a commanding lead here, delivering 4K UHD video recording with professional codecs suitable for high-quality web and social content. The presence of a microphone input enhances audio capture possibilities, which is crucial for vlogging or interviews. Meanwhile, the Samsung HZ35W caps out at modest 720p resolution with an older Motion JPEG codec and no external audio support.
The articulated screen on the Nikon further benefits video framing from different angles, making it an excellent choice for solo creators. Although the P950 lacks touchscreen controls, its button layout ensures reliable physical operation.
Consider the P950 if video recording is part of your creative workflow; the HZ35W is mainly tailored toward stills and casual movies.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Duration and Convenience
Shooting duration impacts how far you can roam during trips or events without interruption.
Specification | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Battery model | EN-EL20a lithium-ion | SLB-11A |
Battery life (CIPA) | Approx. 290 shots | Not officially specified |
Storage options | SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 slot | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Internal |
The P950’s battery provides moderate endurance typical for bridge cameras. Around 290 shots per charge is fair but you may want to carry extras if shooting extensively, especially video. The Nikon supports modern SD cards with ample capacity.
The Samsung’s battery life isn’t specified, but the smaller, compact body suggests less capacity, implying shorter battery life. It does offer internal storage as a fallback, but for serious shooting, an SD card is necessary. Its USB 2.0 interface is acceptable but slower for large transfers.
Durability and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers specialized environmental sealing or ruggedization, meaning that you should treat both cautiously in wet or dusty conditions.
If you need a camera for rugged outdoor adventures, neither is optimized for extreme weather, so protection via covers or cases is recommended.
Price-to-Performance and Final Recommendations
Camera | Launch Price | Status |
---|---|---|
Nikon P950 | $796.95 | Mid-range bridge superzoom |
Samsung HZ35W | $299.99 | Budget compact superzoom |
The Nikon P950 commands a premium price for a capability set rivalling prosumer superzooms, mainly due to its massive zoom, 4K video, and advanced controls. For the features it packs, it is well-positioned as a mid-range enthusiast tool with few competitors in this zoom class.
The Samsung HZ35W is strongly budget-oriented and caters to casual users needing lightweight versatility without professional aspirations. It’s an affordable option for walk-around or vacation snapshots but lacks depth for more demanding photography.
Photography Disciplines Breakdown: Which Camera Shines Where?
Here’s a quick snapshot of how each performs across popular genres and specific demands.
Genre | Nikon P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good bokeh, natural tones, eye detection | Average, less background blur |
Landscape | High resolution, better dynamic range | Moderate, less detail |
Wildlife | Outstanding telephoto reach, AF tracking | Limited zoom, slow AF |
Sports | 7 fps burst, continuous AF tracking | Limited burst, no continuous AF |
Street | Bulkier, less discreet | Lightweight, compact, discreet |
Macro | Close 1 cm focus, good detail | 3 cm macro, reasonable |
Night/Astro | Higher max ISO, cleaner noise | Limited high ISO performance |
Video | 4K UHD, mic input, image stabilization | 720p, no external mic |
Travel | Moderate size, heavier, versatile | Compact, lightweight, portable |
Professional | RAW support, robust controls | No RAW, basic controls |
Summary: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
-
Pick the Nikon P950 if you:
- Want super-telephoto zoom for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
- Need manual controls and RAW shooting for creative flexibility.
- Plan to record high-quality 4K video with audio input options.
- Value an articulating screen and an electronic viewfinder.
- Don’t mind carrying a larger, heavier camera.
- Need a versatile all-in-one bridge camera that covers multiple genres with above-average performance.
-
Opt for the Samsung HZ35W if you:
- Prefer a compact, lightweight camera that fits in a pocket.
- Shoot primarily daylight stills and casual scenes.
- Are price-conscious and want a simple superzoom without complexity.
- Rarely shoot action or video beyond basic clips.
- Prioritize portability and ease over extensive zoom or pro features.
Final Thoughts
Our experience testing thousands of cameras confirms that no model does everything perfectly, especially in categories like superzooms where compromises are inevitable. The Nikon P950 stands out as a powerful jack-of-all-trades capable of delivering quality stills and video with a seriously impressive zoom range. It opens doors for enthusiasts to explore wildlife, sports, macro, and travel photography more thoroughly.
Meanwhile, the Samsung HZ35W remains a valid companion for casual photographers seeking the simplest superzoom experience at an accessible price point, suitable for street and travel photography when you want minimal fuss.
We recommend you try both cameras hands-on if possible. Evaluate how their ergonomics, controls, zoom range, and image quality align with your photographic goals. Check out compatible accessories like extra batteries, memory cards, and possibly tripods to maximize your shooting enjoyment.
Embark on your next photographic adventure equipped with the right tool - whether that’s the Nikon P950’s expansive vision or the Samsung HZ35W’s lightweight simplicity.
If you’re interested in extended testing or specific genre samples, feel free to reach out or explore our full gallery of images shot under varied conditions.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2020-01-07 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005 grams (2.22 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $797 | $300 |