Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the P950 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P950 was launched 9 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the P950 grades vs the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon P950 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Samsung HZ35W
P950 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2020 | June 2010 | Fresher by 117 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Sharper screen (+307k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon P950
HZ35W | P950 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Samsung HZ35W
P950 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon P950 features external dimensions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") having a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the P950 compared to the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the P950 and HZ35W is 52 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P950 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon P950 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher P950 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2020-01-07 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005 grams (2.22 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $797 | $300 |