Nikon Coolpix S100 vs Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS: Compact Cameras Under the Microscope

Selecting a compact camera in today’s interconnected era - where smartphone photography dominates - means looking beyond mere megapixels or catchy specs. Instead, it’s about nuanced factors: ergonomics, sensor performance, build quality, and how a camera fits your unique shooting style. Having spent hundreds of hours testing hundreds of compact models, I dissect two enduring contenders from the last decade: Nikon’s Coolpix S100 and Olympus’ Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS.

Birthed from different design philosophies, these models give us an intriguing comparative case study. The S100 targets casual shooters seeking a lightweight, stylish point-and-shoot. The TG-850 iHS - firmly positioned as a rugged travel companion - touts weatherproofing and extra durability. Both promise convenience with their fixed lenses, but beneath the surface, key differences shape their practical usability and image outcomes.

In this in-depth review, I’ll share insights drawn from methodical hands-on tests - covering everything from sensor capabilities and autofocus sophistication, to ergonomic handling and video prowess - to help you make an informed choice based on actual needs and shooting scenarios.

Before we dive deep, let’s start by getting a sense of their physical design and handling:

When Size and Feel Matter: Ergonomics and Physical Design

The Nikon S100 is a notably slimmer and lighter device, measuring just 99x65x18mm and weighing only 175 grams. This ultra-compact size makes it brilliantly pocket-friendly, appealing for street photographers and travelers who prioritize minimalism. Nikon's organic LED touchscreen (3.5-inches at 820k dots, which we will examine later) reinforces its modern, slick aesthetic - great for swiping through menus or previewing images on the go.

In contrast, Olympus’ TG-850 iHS is chunkier - its 110x64x28mm footprint and 218 grams of weight reflect a more robust build. This additional heft, however, is deliberate: the TG-850 is a waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof warrior designed to survive harsh outdoor environments. This ruggedness comes at the expense of a slimmer profile or lightness, but for adventure photographers, that tradeoff is a winner.

Handling-wise, the TG-850's body feels sturdier, with reinforced materials and textured grip elements preventing slips when wet or wearing gloves. The S100, while less feature-heavy as a weatherproof device, excels in user comfort under everyday shooting conditions.

Checking out their control layouts - our next image - highlights design philosophies even further.

Control and Interface: Prioritizing Ease or Durability?

Both cameras omit traditional viewfinders (an unsurprising choice in compact models this size), relying instead on rear LCDs for framing and menu navigation.

The Nikon S100 embraces simplicity and touchscreen responsiveness, with its OLED fixed-screen boasting smooth touch operation. The buttons are minimal but intuitively placed, aiding quick adjustments. Its touchscreen autofocus function is a definite boon for rapid point selection.

Olympus, true to its “tough” ethos, skips a touchscreen for traditional button controls only. The TG-850 features a tilting 3-inch TFT LCD (460k dots), which, while not vibrant or high-res, can tilt upwards and sideways - a helpful feature for low-angle or selfie shots (although neither camera brands as “selfie-friendly” explicitly). The physical controls here are more pronounced and rugged, designed for tactile feedback when fingers are numb or oily.

Neither camera has extensive manual exposure modes or dedicated dials - common compromises for compact types. Notably, the S100 lacks customizable buttons, while the TG-850 supports a custom self-timer and manual white balance (though limited).

Pixel Power and Sensor Technology: What's Behind the Image?

Both models feature a 1/2.3-inch sensor of identical physical dimensions (6.17x4.55mm) and pack a similar 16-megapixel resolution. However, sensor tech differs subtly:

• Nikon S100 uses a conventional CMOS sensor and the Expeed C2 processor.
• Olympus TG-850 iHS employs a BSI-CMOS sensor with TruePic VII image processing.

The BSI (Backside Illuminated) design in the Olympus sensor tends to gather light more efficiently, often translating to improved noise performance – a crucial advantage in low-light and night conditions.

While neither supports RAW capture - a frustration for enthusiasts wanting more post-production control - both cameras produce respectable JPEGs straight out of the box, with Olympus edging ahead thanks to cleaner shadows and better highlight management, particularly noticeable when shooting in less than ideal lighting.

Dynamic range is tight on both due to sensor constraints; however, Olympus's TruePic VII processing enhances tone curve rendering, preserving detail gracefully against the harsh clipping occasionally seen on the S100’s JPEGs.

Image Quality in the Field: What to Expect for Portraits, Landscapes, and More

Before diving in, check these comparative sample images from my controlled outdoor and indoor tests:

Nikon S100 front Nikon S100 screen back Olympus TG 850 iHS front Olympus TG 850 iHS screen back

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh

Neither camera sports a wide-aperture lens or interchangeable optics, constraining depth-of-field control. The S100's lens apertures range from F3.9 to F4.8 (28-140mm equivalent), while the TG-850 ranges from F3.5 to F5.7 (21-105mm). The Nikon’s slightly longer lens reach benefits tight headshots, but Olympus’s wider field at the short end captures environmental context nicely.

Both cameras support autofocus face/eye detection, with the S100 offering touch-select AF, speeding focus confirmation on eyes in portraits. However, the shallow depth necessary for smooth bokeh remains beyond compact camera reach - backgrounds are usually sharp but creamy with subtle blur near telephoto ends.

Skin tone reproduction differs slightly: Nikon tends to warmer, slightly orange hues, while Olympus is more neutral with accurate color rendition. Thus, Nikon users will add warmth in post for naturalism; Olympus portraits are closer to what you see.

Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range

Here’s where resolution parity gives way to processing prowess. Olympus's higher ISO ceiling (native ISO up to 6400 vs Nikon’s 3200) and superior noise control yield cleaner, more usable images in dimmer situations - ideal for early mornings or shaded areas.

Weather sealing on the TG-850 is a massive boon in the field; I tested it shooting light rain and mist without worry, while the S100 is vulnerable to moisture and dust damage. This attribute alone makes Olympus highly recommended for adventurous travel photographers.

Autofocus and Continuous Shooting: Tracking Moving Subjects

Capturing wildlife, sports, or street action demands snappy and reliable autofocus (AF), coupled with decent continuous shooting rates.

• Nikon S100 provides contrast-detection AF with face detection and selective area focus, but no continuous AF mode. Burst rate is capped at 6 frames per second.
• Olympus TG-850 iHS also uses contrast detection but supports continuous AF and offers a faster burst rate of 7 fps.

I found the TG-850’s AF more consistent locking onto moving subjects, even in low light - though both cameras lag compared to DSLR or mirrorless systems. Face detection is well implemented on both, but Olympus’s additional spot metering enhances subject isolation in tricky lighting.

For birdwatchers or sports fans, the TG-850 offers tangible benefits despite its modest sensor size constraints.

Low Light and Night Photography: Noise Handling and Exposure Control

Neither camera is poised to challenge enthusiast-level low light performers, but within their category, Olympus again has an edge.

The S100 reaches ISO 3200 max, but noise degrades image quality noticeably above ISO 800 on 100% crops. Olympus, with its ISO ceiling at 6400, applies superior onboard noise reduction, making handheld night shots or indoor events more satisfying.

Shutter speed ranges are comparable (maximum 1/2000s), though Olympus extends a slow shutter speed limit to 1/2 second (vs Nikon’s 4 seconds minimum), granting slightly more flexibility for creative exposures or low-light experiments.

Unfortunately, neither supports bulb modes nor manual exposure. This limits astrophotography potential - both cameras are more suited to casual night scenes than to serious night sky imaging.

Video Recording Capabilities: How They Stack Up

Video remains a popular feature even in compact cameras. Both record Full HD 1080p video, but frame rate options vary:

• The Nikon S100 supports 1080p at 30 fps.
• Olympus TG-850 iHS offers 1080p at 60 fps and 30 fps modes.

The higher frame rate on the TG-850 allows smoother playback and slow-motion conversion - excellent for capturing dynamic sports or wildlife behavior.

Audio capture suffers from lack of external mic inputs on both, which limits professional video production. Stabilization is optical in both models, which mitigates handheld shake effectively for casual shooting.

Macro and Close-Up Photography

The Nikon S100 impresses with its 1cm macro focusing capability, letting users get extremely close to subjects and capture fine detail. This is a rarity in compact cameras and opens avenues for insect and flower photography without accessories.

Olympus’s macro range is unspecified but typical for compacts, generally unable to match S100's close focusing distance.

However, Olympus compensates with better stabilization and ruggedness, allowing use in challenging environments (e.g., near water or in sandy conditions) where macro subjects abound.

Battery Life and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected

Contrast here is stark, and directly affects usability on long trips.

• The Nikon S100’s EN-EL12 battery yields approximately 150 shots per charge. This is short by today’s standards.
• Olympus TG-850’s LI-50B battery delivers up to 330 shots, over twice as long.

Connectivity-wise, the S100 offers no wireless options. Olympus includes Wi-Fi, enabling easy photo transfer and remote camera control from smartphones - a major convenience for social shooters and travelers.

Both cameras use standard SD card slots but lack dual slots, an important consideration for professional backup needs.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Adventure?

(LCD display and interface)

While the Nikon S100 boasts a sleek design and high-quality OLED screen with touch controls, it lacks any environmental sealing. This restricts use in challenging climates or rough handling.

Olympus’s robust construction - rated waterproof to 15 meters, shockproof from 2.1 meters, freezeproof to -10°C, and crushproof to 100 kgf - clearly targets adventure photographers or anyone needing extra confidence in tough conditions.

For professional outdoor work or vacationing in diverse environments, the TG-850’s durability is a compelling advantage.

The Lens Ecosystem Question: Fixed Focus, Fixed Limitations

Both are fixed-lens cameras, designed to maximize versatility in a small package.

• Nikon S100’s 5x zoom covers 28-140mm equivalent - slightly longer telephoto reach.
• Olympus TG-850 offers 5x zoom at 21-105mm equivalent - wider field for landscapes and group shots.

Neither support interchangeable lenses or lens accessories, curbing optical flexibility. Users who want specialized optics, such as fast primes or super-telephoto, will find these cameras limiting.

Practical Recommendations: Who Should Consider Nikon S100 or Olympus TG-850?

When assessing compact cameras like these, it’s critical to baseline your priorities:

• For casual, everyday photography with a focus on portability and touchscreen convenience:
  The Nikon Coolpix S100 shines. It’s lightweight, with a bright and responsive OLED screen and excellent macro capabilities. Perfect for family outings, urban strolls, or quick snapshots where discretion is prized.

• For outdoor enthusiasts, travelers, and rugged shooters:
  The Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS dominates. Its superior battery life, weatherproofing, and more robust AF/continuous shooting performance make it better suited for active, unpredictable settings. The tilting screen and Wi-Fi connectivity broaden creative options and workflow convenience.

Neither camera replaces advanced interchangeable-lens systems or smartphones with cutting-edge AI, but both hold niche appeal where simplicity meets specific needs.

How These Compacts Perform Across Photography Genres

Further refining recommendations by genre:

• Portraits: Both OK; Nikon’s warmer color and touch AF help casual users. Olympus neutral colors aid natural skin rendering.
• Landscapes: Olympus’s wider lens and weather sealing stand out.
• Wildlife: Olympus edges forward with faster AF and continuous modes.
• Sports: Olympus’s faster burst and AF give it an advantage.
• Street: Nikon’s compact size and touchscreen appeal for stealth.
• Macro: Nikon excels with 1cm focus.
• Night/Astro: Olympus wins low ISO noise and exposure control.
• Video: Olympus 60p recording and stabilization better for smooth footage.
• Travel: Olympus builds on versatility and endurance.
• Professional Use: Neither targets pro workflows; Olympus’s ruggedness might suit casual pro use in risky conditions.

Final Thoughts: Choosing Compact Confidence with Real-World Insights

Throughout extensive hands-on testing, the Nikon Coolpix S100 revealed itself as a stylish, user-friendly point-and-shoot designed for casual photographers prioritizing ease and portability. Its impressive macro capabilities and vivid OLED touchscreen provide pleasurable shooting, yet limitations in battery life and environmental resilience temper its usefulness outdoors.

Conversely, Olympus’ Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS impresses in durability, practical battery longevity, and more versatile autofocus - characteristics vital for travelers, adventurers, and action shooters. While it sacrifices some size and touchscreen niceties, its thoughtful design, Wi-Fi connectivity, and video capabilities reward real-world usage beyond conventional compact cameras.

If your photographic playground is the urban jungle on sunny days, or you cherish nuanced macro details indoors, the Nikon S100 remains appealing. But if you pursue rugged landscapes, chase wildlife, or engage in active sports photography under varying conditions, the TG-850 iHS stands out as the more reliable companion.

I hope this detailed comparison illuminates the practical strengths and trade-offs between these two compact cameras. Each has carved a clear niche, and selecting the one that aligns with your photographic ambitions will yield rewarding experiences far beyond mere specifications.

Happy shooting!