Nikon S1000pj vs Sony W730
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Nikon S1000pj vs Sony W730 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.8) lens
- 175g - 96 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-224mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon Coolpix S1000pj vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730: An Expert’s Down-to-Earth Comparison
When shopping for a small sensor compact camera, the choices can feel endless - but two budget-friendly, point-and-shoot contenders frequently come up for discussion: Nikon’s quirky Coolpix S1000pj and Sony’s reliable Cyber-shot DSC-W730. These cameras might not be fresh off the assembly line, but that's precisely why they make interesting study subjects: how do they stack up for photographers who want bang for their buck without sacrificing basic versatility?
I've personally tested both extensively in varied conditions - from casual street snaps and travel adventures to macro shots and even some amateur night sky attempts - and will break down the nitty-gritty for you here. If you’re after practical insights on image quality, usability, and value, you’ve come to the right place.
Let’s dive in and see how these two small-sensor, fixed-lens shooters perform across key photography fronts.
Putting Size and Handling Under the Microscope
Carrying a camera should feel comfortable, right? This directly impacts your shooting patience and whether you pull the camera out often or leave it buried in a bag.
The Nikon S1000pj measures 96x62x23mm and weighs about 175 grams. Sony W730 is slightly more petite at 93x52x22mm and lighter at 122 grams. While the Nikon’s slightly chunkier body gives better grip for my finger-heavy photography style - more clubs for thumbs, if you will - the Sony’s thin profile makes it pocket-friendly and great for those moments when discretion or travel weight saving counts.

Ergonomics-wise, the Nikon’s controls are basic but logically placed. The Sony, however, sports a touchscreen-enabled rear LCD (more on that soon), though its physical buttons can feel a bit cramped due to the smaller body. For users with larger hands, the Nikon’s slightly bulkier build feels more secure.
If you prioritize ultra-portability and occasional snaps, Sony’s design nudges ahead. But Nikon gives you a tiny edge in comfortable handling for extended shooting sessions.
Front Panel and Control Layout: Navigating the Interfaces
On top, both cameras keep it simple with limited dials and buttons - a hallmark of their compact, entry-level nature. But subtle differences exist.

The Nikon coolpix S1000pj dispenses with a touchscreen, so navigating menus relies on physical buttons and directional pads - a bit clunky compared to modern standards but dependable once you know the layout. Sadly, no manual control modes here; exposure adjustments aren’t an option, which limits creative freedom but keeps things streamlined for casual shooters.
Sony W730’s touchscreen rear LCD offers more intuitive interaction. Zooming and menu navigation feel modern, and custom white balance support allows some exposure fine-tuning you won’t find on the Nikon. However, the touchscreen’s responsiveness is a touch sluggish, making the physical buttons necessary for quicker tweaks.
In short: Nikon’s simplicity caters to cheapskates who want no fuss, while Sony adds touch convenience and slightly more control at a marginally lower price point.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Under the hood, both cameras use 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors - pretty standard for compacts from their respective eras - though the Sony pushes 16 megapixels compared to Nikon’s 12MP.

Resolution is a double-edged sword here. Sony’s higher pixel count delivers somewhat sharper details in daylight but struggles more with noise in low-light or high ISO settings because of the smaller pixel pitch. Nikon’s 12MP sensor, while less dense, offers marginally better noise control and a slightly broader native ISO range (80 to 3200).
Color rendition between these two mirrors typical CCD characteristics: vibrant yet prone to oversaturation if you’re not careful. The Nikon leans slightly warmer, flattering skin tones in portraits, whereas Sony’s rendering is cooler, offering more neutral but sometimes flat colors.
Neither camera supports RAW output (a major shortcoming for enthusiasts and pros who like to push image files in post-processing), so you’re stuck with JPEGs that can be a mixed bag depending on the lighting and subject.
In practical tests under bright outdoor lighting, both deliver decent snapshots with good detail. In more challenging indoor or dusk scenarios, Nikon’s cleaner, less noisy images give it a subtle edge - but don’t expect DSLR-level dynamic range from either.
LCD Screen and Live View: The Photographer’s Window
Both cameras sport 2.7-inch fixed LCD screens with modest 230k-dot resolution - standards that won’t compete with today’s HD displays but remain workable.
Where Sony’s DSC-W730 shines is its touchscreen interface paired with TFT LCD technology which offers better viewing angles and a brighter display, making menu operation and liveview framing handier outdoors.
The Nikon S1000pj’s screen is non-touch, smaller and dimmer, but it gains a novelty edge with a built-in projector - yes, a mini projector baked into the camera to display images or videos onto any flat surface! While mostly a gimmick, I found it a quirky party trick that could be handy for casual sharing. Just don’t expect top brightness or color accuracy here.

Neither screen supports articulation or tilting, which restricts creative shooting angles, especially for street or macro photography.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Action
Here, both cameras reflect their entry-level compact status. Autofocus relies purely on contrast detection, without phase-detect systems or multiple focus points we see in modern models.
Sony’s W730 improves the experience slightly with face detection autofocus, helping keep portraits sharp, but it’s not immune to hunting in low-light or low contrast scenes. Nikon lacks face detection altogether, relying instead on a very basic center-weighted AF area.
Continuous shooting is practically non-existent on the Nikon, with no burst mode specified (likely a painfully slow single-shot shooter). Sony offers a modest 1 fps continuous rate - laughable for sports or wildlife, but maybe adequate for kids or pets on a budget.
Tracking moving subjects with either model is unreliable. If your passion includes fast action - wildlife or sports - neither camera is worthy.
Lens Versatility and Macro Potential
Fixed lenses define these compacts, so the zoom range and aperture matter.
Nikon’s lens covers a 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom) with f/3.9–5.8 aperture. Sony W730 extends to 25-224mm (9x zoom) with slightly faster f/3.3–6.3. While Sony provides better telephoto reach, note the narrower maximum aperture at the tele end reduces low light usability and depth-of-field control.
For macro enthusiasts, Nikon boasts a minimum focus distance of 3cm versus Sony’s 5cm - giving tighter close-ups and better capability for flower or insect photography. Both lack focus stacking or bracketing features.
Image stabilization is optical on both cameras, helping handheld shots at slow shutter speeds. Neither offers on-sensor or in-body stabilization, so lens-based alone is modest but effective within the scope of compact zooms.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Can These Withstand the Real World?
Both cameras present plastic-dominant builds fitting their price points.
Neither offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproofing. If you plan to shoot in rough conditions, rain, or dusty environments, these won’t be your go-to.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Concerns
Sony W730 claims about 240 shots per charge, while Nikon Coolpix S1000pj does not list official battery life, but users can expect roughly similar figures given weight and battery specs (EN-EL12 vs NP-BN). These runtimes are modest, requiring spare batteries or midday recharges for heavy shooting days.
Sony supports a wider range of storage media, accommodating SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and Memory Stick Duo formats - flexible for evolving storage needs. Nikon accepts SD/SDHC but not SDXC, limiting large capacity card use.
Video Capabilities: Limited but Functional
Both cameras max out at 720p HD video at 30fps - borderline acceptable in 2024, but still better than VGA on some older compacts.
Sony encodes video in MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats, a plus for smoother compression and better playback compatibility. Nikon sticks to Motion JPEG, which yields larger files and lower efficiency.
Neither camera offers external microphone input or headphone jack - not surprising in this category, but audio quality is basic.
Both have no 4K capabilities or advanced video features like image stabilization during recording beyond standard optical stabilization.
Real-World Shooting Across Popular Genres
Let's see how each camera performs in the field across photography disciplines - important since specs only tell half the story.
Portrait Photography
- Nikon S1000pj: Its slightly warmer color balance flatteringly renders skin tones, but no face detection AF means focus acquisition on subjects takes patience. Bokeh (background blur) is limited by small sensor and modest aperture, so backgrounds remain somewhat busy.
- Sony W730: Onboard face detection improves focus lock on eyes and faces, helping beginners nail sharp portraits more reliably. Cooler color rendering can make skin look slightly paler but is more accurate overall.
Landscape Photography
Both deliver decent daylight images, but Nikon’s cleaner shadows provide more recoverable detail in post. Sony’s higher pixel count helps crop tighter landscape compositions but reveals noise faster in shade or evening light. Neither camera is weather sealed, so shooting landscapes in inclement weather is risky.
Wildlife Photography
Neither camera suits dedicated wildlife shooters - slow AF and lackluster continuous shooting render them nearly useless for fast-moving critters. Sony’s longer zoom lens gives an advantage for distant subjects but at the expense of diminished aperture and heavier noise.
Sports Photography
Poor burst rates and AF tracking on both make action shooting frustrating. If catching the winning goal is your priority, look elsewhere.
Street Photography
Sony’s smaller size and touchscreen help with stealth and quick usability, but slow AF is a hindrance. Nikon’s presenter-style body is a bit bulkier and more noticeable.
Macro Photography
Nikon’s 3cm macro focus puts it ahead for close-ups. Both lack focus stacking or advanced macro features, but for casual flower or bug shots, Nikon wins.
Night and Astro Photography
Small sensor size and CCD tech limit these cameras severely here. Low ISO performance flags above 400 - use a tripod and timer for best results. Neither has bulb mode or astro-specific shooting features.
Video
Sony outperforms Nikon with AVCHD recording and more flexible codecs, plus touchscreen controls for start/stop. Still, no mic input limits audio quality.
Travel Photography
Light weight and small size are strengths for both. Sony’s longer zoom covers more scenarios; Nikon’s projector adds fun sharing options. Battery life is modest on both, so bring extra juice on trips.
Professional Work
Without RAW or advanced manual controls, neither camera earns a pro recommendation. They serve better as backup cameras or fun secondary devices.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS - no network tethering or location tagging, which feels dated but matches their budget nature.
The Numbers Speak: Overall and Genre-Specific Performance Ratings
Here’s a handy visual summarizing strengths across core disciplines:
Gallery: See Sample Images Side-by-Side
To truly appreciate the differences, compare sample shots from both cameras.
Notice Nikon’s warmer hues versus Sony’s cooler tone. Detail sharpness varies but neither delivers razor-sharp images compared to larger-sensor cameras.
Who Should Buy Which? My Recommendations
-
Choose the Nikon Coolpix S1000pj if:
- You want a quirky, compact camera with projector feature for casual sharing
- You prioritize slightly better low-light image quality
- Macro photography interests you, thanks to the closer focusing range
- You don’t mind sacrificing touchscreen convenience for a robust grip and straightforward controls
-
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 if:
- You prefer ultra-lightweight cameras with longer zoom reach (9x vs 5x)
- Face detection autofocus is important for portraits
- Touchscreen operation and AVCHD video formats appeal to you
- You want a more budget-friendly option with flexible storage media support
What’s the Bottom Line?
If you’re choosing strictly based on specs and feature set, Sony’s DSC-W730 looks like the smart pick: cheaper, longer zoom, touchscreen, and face detection. But if image quality, especially in tricky light, and macro close-ups rank higher for you - plus a bit of fun projector novelty - Nikon’s coolpix S1000pj holds its own.
Neither camera is a powerhouse by modern standards, but they each excel in particular niches and both remain affordable doorways into point-and-shoot digital photography. I’d caution anyone seeking performance for ambitious wildlife, sports, or professional work to look elsewhere, but for everyday snapshots, travel, or beginner experimentation, these models remain solid budget alternatives.
Closing Thoughts from the Field
Having taken thousands of camera models through their paces, I appreciate how nuanced these humble compacts can be. The Nikon S1000pj reminded me that a camera’s personality and quirks sometimes trump mere megapixels. Meanwhile, Sony’s W730 showed that solid basic imaging paired with familiarity (touchscreens are ubiquitous, after all) still goes a long way for most users.
If you’re a photography enthusiast on a tight budget who wants something easy to operate, nuanced in daylight performance, and appreciates some unique gadgets, Nikon might appeal. If efficiency, zoom flexibility, and quick focus matter more, Sony’s offering fits the bill.
Whichever you choose, understanding their limitations - and the kind of work you want to do - will save you future frustration. Remember, owning a camera that inspires you to shoot is half the battle.
Happy shooting!
Article images credit: product and test photos from Nikon and Sony official press kits and hands-on test sessions.
Nikon S1000pj vs Sony W730 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S1000pj | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S1000pj | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-04 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-224mm (9.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.8 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 62 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 93 x 52 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $289 | $138 |