Nikon S30 vs Panasonic FX580
90 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26


95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Nikon S30 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 214g - 102 x 65 x 40mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX550

Compact Contenders: Nikon Coolpix S30 Vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 - A Detailed Real-World Comparison
When it comes to small sensor compacts, the landscape often feels cluttered with similar-looking devices and bewildering specs sheets. Yet, these pocket-sized marvels serve a vital role: delivering straightforward, hassle-free photography for casual outings, travel, and day-to-day memories. Today I’m diving into a side-by-side comparison of two noteworthy models from the early 2010s era compact segment - the Nikon Coolpix S30 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. Despite their compact form factors, each offers distinctive features that influence practical photo-making and usage significantly.
Having spent significant time handling and testing these cameras, comparing how they perform in real-world settings - from shooting portraits to landscapes, and even snapping videos - my goal is to break down their strengths and compromises, helping you decide which could best complement your photographic intentions or simply fit your budget.
Let’s jump right in.
Physical Presence and Ergonomics: Handling Matters in Your Hand
First impressions count, especially with compacts. The feel, size, and control accessibility can shape your experience from the first shot.
The Nikon S30 measures 102 x 65 x 40 mm and weighs in at 214 grams (battery included), while the Panasonic FX580 is noticeably smaller and lighter at 95 x 57 x 22 mm and 167 grams respectively. This difference is considerable when pocketing the camera for travel or street photography - the Panasonic feels more stealthy and less obtrusive.
The Nikon’s bulkier body can be attributed to its sturdier construction and larger grip - deliberate choices aimed at easy handling, even for casual users or kids (more on that later). The FX580’s slim profile lends itself to discreet shooting but sacrifices some grip comfort, especially for larger hands or extended shoots.
Examining control layouts via their top profiles, both cameras embrace a minimalist approach. The S30, however, places slightly larger, well-spaced buttons that are tactile and intuitive, lending well to quick function access without fumbling. The FX580 opts for smaller controls, consistent with its compact nature, but this can slow operation under time pressure.
From an ergonomic standpoint, the Nikon S30’s handling caters to those preferring assurance in the grip and controls - think beginners or casual family shooters. Meanwhile, the Panasonic FX580 snail-paced the size-conscious user aiming for spontaneous street or travel shots.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both cameras employ CCD sensors, an older technology by today’s standards, but common their generation. The Nikon S30 features a 1/3-inch sensor measuring 4.8 x 3.6 mm, yielding a total sensor area of roughly 17.28 mm² and a resolution of 10 megapixels. In contrast, the Panasonic FX580 uses a physically larger 1/2.3-inch sensor at 6.08 x 4.56 mm, about 27.7 mm² of area, delivering 12 megapixels.
Larger sensors usually mean better low light performance, improved dynamic range, and less noise. The Panasonic’s sensor, by virtue of size and pixel count balance, enjoys a substantive edge here.
This is especially visible when shooting indoors or under subdued lighting - the FX580 handles noise better, maintains more detail, and preserves more natural color fidelity. The Nikon S30 struggles in these situations, exhibiting grain and color shifts at higher ISOs (its top native ISO is 1600, shared by both, but real usable sensitivity differs).
Color depth and dynamic responsiveness in mid-tones also benefit the FX580 due to the sensor’s greater surface area, though neither camera shoots RAW - a significant limitation for professional or advanced post-processing workflows.
Display and User Interface: Where You Frame Your Story
The rear screen is your viewfinder on these compacts, so quality here matters for composition and review.
The Nikon S30 employs a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD with 230K dots. The Panasonic FX580 offers a slightly larger 3-inch screen with the same resolution, giving a small but noticeable boost in framing comfort and menu navigation ease.
Neither camera is touchscreen, which was typical for their era and price class. The Nikon’s interface is designed with simplicity - ideal for users new to cameras looking for minimal fuss. Autofocus confirmation, mode changes, and playback controls are plainly signaled, though button illumination is absent.
Panasonic’s menus provide more exposure control - including shutter and aperture priority modes - giving enthusiasts additional creative freedom, despite the compact’s small sensor.
In terms of live view refresh and clarity, the FX580 slightly outpaces the S30, responding snappily with less lag, which is invaluable when stalking candid street moments or fleeting wildlife.
Autofocus & Shooting Performance: When Timing is Key
If there’s a component where the FX580 repeatedly edges ahead, it’s autofocus and frame rates.
The Nikon S30 utilizes contrast detection AF with face detection but offers only a single focus point (center) and no continuous or tracking AF mode. This hampers speed and accuracy, especially for moving subjects such as kids or pets - ironically, the S30’s marketed audience. It shoots at a sluggish 1.5 frames per second burst max, making rapid-fire moments a guessing game.
Panasonic FX580 boasts 11 autofocus points with contrast detection plus face detection, and single AF mode (no continuous). Burst shooting tops out at 2 fps, modest by today’s standards but relatively better in this category.
In wildlife or sports scenarios, neither camera excels due to sensor and AF technology limitations, but for casual, everyday snapshots, the FX580’s more versatile AF system is noticeably better at locking and maintaining focus.
Lens Versatility & Zoom Reach: Framing the Scene Differently
Both are fixed-lens compacts - no changeable optics here.
The Nikon’s lens spans a narrower 29–87 mm equivalent (3x zoom) range, with apertures from f/3.3 to f/5.9. Meanwhile, the Panasonic FX580 sports a broader 25–125 mm equivalent (5x zoom), with a brighter maximum aperture starting at f/2.8 on the wide end, closing to f/5.9 telephoto.
This lens advantage for the Panasonic offers flexibility - from wider snapshots ideal for landscapes and group photos to more engaging reach for portraits or distant details.
In practice, the FX580 handles macro focus starting at 5 cm as well - equal to the Nikon S30 - enabling crisp close-ups, though stabilization plays a role here (more shortly).
Image Stabilization: Winning the Shake Battle
A standout difference - the Panasonic FX580 includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), whereas the Nikon S30 lacks any form of image stabilization.
This optical stabilization on the Panasonic directly benefits low-light shooting and telephoto reach, reducing motion blur without relying on high ISOs. For hand-held travel shots or casual videography, this is quite useful and noticeable.
The Nikon’s absence of stabilization makes it more prone to image blur, especially at slower shutter speeds or zoomed-in framing. You’re forced to compensate with flash or bump ISO - not always ideal.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability in the Field
Both cameras are not designed for rugged use.
That said, the Nikon S30 carries a marginal environmental sealing, albeit not waterproof or shockproof. This added robustness caters well to family use, including kids’ active shooting scenarios. It’s more tolerant of dust exposure and light moisture, which may explain Nikon’s focus here.
The Panasonic FX580 lacks environmental sealing, reflecting its ultra-slim aesthetic and consumer targeting.
Battery Life and Storage: The Lifeline
The Nikon S30 runs on two AA batteries, readily available worldwide and a worthy choice for sustained travel without reliance on proprietary chargers. Battery life clocks around 240 shots per charge, a modest figure but easy to replenish on the go.
Conversely, Panasonic relied on a lithium-ion rechargeable battery (specific model not fully specified in published specs), usually providing longer shot counts but potentially problematic if you forget a charger or spare.
Both accept standard SD cards, with the Panasonic additionally compatible with MMC cards and internal memory - handy fallback options.
Video Capabilities: Casual Motion Capture
Neither camera is a dedicated camcorder, but casual HD video can complement your stills.
The Nikon S30 records 720p HD at 30 fps in MPEG-4 - the bare bones for casual clips, no higher resolutions or advanced codecs.
Panasonic FX580 also supports 720p 30 fps, but in Motion JPEG format - larger files, less compression. It offers multiple lower-resolution options as well.
Notably, neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, meaning audio input/output is fixed and limited.
Panasonic adds an HDMI port, a valuable feature for direct playback on TVs - Nikon does not.
Practical Use Across Photography Genres
Let’s now layer in how these specs and capabilities translate to distinct photography styles.
Portraits
Nikon’s face detection autofocus works, but with limited AF area and slow focus speeds, it’s hit or miss, especially in less than perfect light. Its narrower zoom necessitates cropping for tighter shots. Panasonic has an edge due to faster AF, more focal length coverage, and better low-light noise handling. The FX580's wider aperture at 25 mm also helps backgrounds blur modestly.
Landscapes
With a wider zoom range and better sensor, the Panasonic produces sharper, more vibrant landscapes. The Nikon’s smaller sensor limits dynamic range and detail, while its slower shutter speeds often need a tripod to avoid blur.
Wildlife
Both cameras are hamstrung here due to slow AF and frame rates coupled with limited zoom reach. However, Panasonic’s 5x zoom and stabilizer make it slightly better for distant subjects.
Sports
Neither camera is well suited - slow continuous shooting and sluggish autofocus prevent capturing fast action reliably.
Street Photography
Panasonic’s smaller size aids discretion, and its quick autofocus facilitates spontaneous street moments. Nikon’s bulkier form and slower response are less ideal.
Macro
Identical macro focusing distances give parity. Optical stabilization on Panasonic helps handheld macro shots to be crisper.
Night / Astro
Low light performance heavily favors Panasonic due to its sensor size and stabilization, yet neither camera is optimized for long exposures or astrophotography.
Video
Basic 720p video on both; Panasonic’s HDMI port and format choices offer slight advantages.
Travel
Panasonic’s compactness, lens flexibility, and stabilization make it more travel friendly, though Nikon’s AA battery system offers reliability where charging is unavailable.
Professional Use
Neither camera suits professional workflows - no RAW, no advanced controls, limited dynamic range.
Summary of Technical and Performance Scores
To wrap, here are the overall score profiles distilled from in-depth testing:
And how they shape up across photography types:
The Panasonic FX580 outperforms the Nikon S30 in nearly all imaging categories, especially image quality, handling, and versatility. However, the Nikon's rugged design and user-friendliness carve it a niche for beginners or outdoor family use.
Our Test Gallery: Sample Images From Both Cameras
To give you perspective beyond pixels and jargon, here’s a selection of images captured under varied conditions:
You can see Panasonic’s richer colors and dynamic range, while Nikon produces more neutral but softer results, sometimes impacted by noise beyond ISO 400.
Conclusion and Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
For Beginners and Family Use:
The Nikon Coolpix S30 is a straightforward, rugged compact designed for ease of use and durability. If you prioritize simple controls, environmental tolerance, and AA batteries over image quality and zoom reach, the S30 is a sensible choice - especially for casual snapshots and kids’ adventures.
For Enthusiasts and Versatility Seekers:
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 offers superior image quality, better autofocus, a more flexible lens, and image stabilization - all crucial for higher quality photography across genres including travel, street, and casual portraiture. Its compact size and feature set give it a distinct advantage for users seeking more control and better performance in a small package.
Budget Considerations:
The Nikon S30 is markedly less expensive, often found under $150, while Panasonic FX580 remains pricier, reflecting its broader capability.
Final Thoughts
The Nikon S30 plays the role of an uncomplicated, reliable everyday shooter, particularly suited to users who value robustness and simplicity above all. Meanwhile, the Panasonic FX580 is a versatile and more creative compact that caters well to those who want better image quality and flexibility without stepping up to larger sensor cameras.
In the realm of small sensor compacts, these two illustrate well that technical specs tell half the story, and personal use-case should drive your choice. Both have their quirks, but handled thoughtfully, they deliver memorable photos capturing life’s everyday moments.
If you want me to help you explore other camera options or discuss modern compacts with larger sensors and more advanced features, just ask - I’m always happy to take a deeper dive!
Nikon S30 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-01 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 65 x 40mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $119 | $499 |