Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31753/31753135b8cedc7114ec1b04d3acdf66da76f921" alt="Pentax K-5 II front Pentax K-5 II front"
60 Imaging
57 Features
82 Overall
67
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Released June 2013
- Superseded the Pentax K-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax K-5 II, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-5 II (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-5 II (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 9 years before the K-5 II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 matches up versus the K-5 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Pentax K-5 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax K-5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-5 II
E-300 | K-5 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 II over the Olympus E-300
K-5 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 102 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-5 II
E-300 | K-5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Pentax K-5 II has dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") and a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax K-5 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 and the K-5 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df1a1/df1a10a3344358cf34c55f1adce7413872a98717" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and K-5 II is 67 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c90df/c90df2ef71efcb65686159ad433f973016f2451d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and K-5 II.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax K-5 II will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef80/fef80fcba9545221b89b2334237fee390b7f488a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6de1/f6de18cc8bf2c68e8c0687301aee6e38e8cdaa9b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-5 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-5 II |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2013-06-04 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 760g (1.68 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1235 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 980 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $800 | $830 |