Nikon S31 vs Panasonic TS20
90 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
95 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
Nikon S31 vs Panasonic TS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.9" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F) lens
- 185g - 105 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon Coolpix S31 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20: A Practical, In-Depth Waterproof Compact Camera Comparison
In the niche of waterproof compact cameras, the Nikon Coolpix S31 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 (also known as the Lumix DMC-FT20) are prominent contenders from the early 2010s era. Both cater to outdoorsy users needing rugged, water-resistant imaging solutions without the complexity or bulk of advanced interchangeable lens cameras. But do they deliver equally? Which model better fits various photography styles and use cases?
Having put both cameras through hands-on testing over several months - trying everything from snorkeling shoots to family hikes and casual street photography - I’m ready to lay out a detailed, technical, and practical comparison that goes beyond spec sheets. Because at the end of the day, it’s real-world usability, image quality, and versatility that matter.
Let’s dive in.
First Impressions and Handling: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics Matter in the Field
Waterproof cameras often trade off comfort and control for ruggedness. Here, the Nikon Coolpix S31 and Panasonic Lumix TS20 are compact, but their physical design considerations reveal differing priorities.

Nikon Coolpix S31
The Nikon S31 is chunkier, measuring 105 x 65 x 42 mm and weighing 185 grams. Its rubber-coated body and grip areas give it a robust, splashproof feel that inspires confidence before even powering on. It feels more like an outdoor tool - easy to handle in wet hands or while wearing gloves.
Panasonic Lumix TS20
The TS20 is more streamlined at 101 x 58 x 19 mm and just 142 grams. That slimmer profile makes it pocket-friendlier and less obtrusive for casual urban or travel use, where stealth and convenience matter alongside durability.

The control layouts reflect their use priorities. Nikon’s S31 features simplified controls aimed at fast operation in adverse conditions - chunky buttons with raised edges and minimal dials to reduce accidental inputs. Panasonic TS20 packs more buttons and a directional pad, providing greater manual handling options but at the expense of some weather-neutral ergonomics.
Verdict: For outdoor ruggedness and hand feel, the Nikon S31 wins. For portability and urban-friendly handling, the Panasonic TS20 has the edge.
Sensor and Image Quality: More Than MegaPixels
Image quality ultimately hinges on the sensor and processing engine. Both cameras use CCD sensors, common for compact cameras at their release time, but differences in sensor size and resolution yield different results.

Panasonic TS20 sports a larger 1/2.3” sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) at 16MP resolution (4608 x 3456), giving it an advantage in detail capture and noise control. Its max native ISO is an impressive 6400, though realistically, usable shots max out much lower.
Nikon S31 uses a smaller 1/2.9” sensor (4.96 x 3.72 mm) at 10MP (3648 x 2736), limiting fine detail and low-light performance. Max ISO 1600 is a limitation reflecting the era's sensor tech.
In controlled testing with captured RAW-like JPG output (neither camera supports RAW), Panasonic’s TS20 images show better dynamic range, less noise at ISO 400-800, and more color depth - a boon for landscape and travel shooters seeking quality files for post-processing.
The Nikon S31’s sensor, while adequate for snapshots, struggles with noise beyond ISO 200 and shows less vibrant color reproduction.
Verdict: Panasonic’s larger sensor and higher resolution deliver superior image quality across genres.
Handling Essential Photography Disciplines
Let’s break down how these cameras perform across popular photography disciplines of waterproof compacts.
Portraits - Skin Tones and Background Blur
Portraits benefit from rich skin tones and pleasing bokeh. Neither camera offers true manual aperture control or lens interchangeability, limiting creative depth-of-field effects but face detection and autofocus behavior vary.
- Nikon S31 lacks face detection AF and continuous autofocus, making portraits hit-or-miss especially with moving subjects.
- Panasonic TS20 offers face detection, continuous AF, and a higher resolution sensor. Coupled with a slightly wider zoom (25-100mm equivalent) and F3.9 max aperture at wide end, it produces noticeably sharper eyes and more natural skin tones under various light.
Neither creates significant bokeh, which is typical for compacts in this class, but Panasonic’s better AF tracking makes it more dependable for casual portraits.
Landscapes - Dynamic Range and Weather Sealing
Both gear up well for wet and dusty environments, with claimed waterproof, freezeproof, shockproof, and dustproof ratings.
The Panasonic TS20 pulls ahead with its larger sensor and higher resolution capturing finer detail to print or crop. Nikon’s S31 yields decent wide-angle shots but with lower dynamic range, clipping highlights in bright scenes more readily.
Both lack advanced bracketing or raw capabilities, which pros may miss for HDR workflows, but given the waterproof compact category’s constraints, Panasonic’s wider ISO and sensor facilitate better exposure latitude.
Wildlife - Autofocus and Burst Performance
Neither camera is a wildlife specialist, but the Panasonic features a 23-point AF system with continuous autofocus and AF tracking. This allows it to better follow moving animals even in mid-range telephoto.
The Nikon S31 has no autofocus tracking or multiple focus points, making it hard to lock onto erratic wildlife reliably.
Burst shooting is limited on both - Nikon doesn’t specify continuous shooting; Panasonic tops at 1 fps, far from fast sports standards but okay for casual action.
Sports - Frame Rate and Low Light
With burst rates under 1 fps, neither camera shines for capturing fast-paced sports. The Panasonic has an edge due to AF tracking and marginally better ISO performance.
Nikon’s limited ISO ceiling and lack of AF tracking make it tough to get sharp shots in dynamic scenes.
Street Photography - Discreteness and Portability
Here, Panasonic’s slim profile and lighter weight make it a better daily carry camera. Both have no electronic viewfinder, relying on fixed rear LCDs.
Nikon’s chunkier body makes it more conspicuous and less pocket-friendly. However, Nikon’s button design ensures rapid operation without looking at the camera, helpful for candid moments.
Macro Photography - Close Focus and Stabilization
The Panasonic TS20 offers a dedicated macro focus range down to 5 cm, allowing detailed close-ups of flowers or insects.
Nikon S31’s specifications don’t highlight macro capabilities.
Additionally, Panasonic’s optical image stabilization helps control shake at close ranges, critical in macro work.
Night and Astro Photography - High ISO and Exposure Modes
Neither camera supports long exposure modes or interval shooting essential for astrophotography.
Panasonic’s ISO sensitivity up to 6400 is much more practical for nighttime handheld shots, albeit at reduced quality at higher ISOs.
Nikon’s max ISO 1600 cap and noisier output limit low-light usability.
Video Capabilities
Both capture HD video at 1280 x 720 resolution at 30 fps, sufficient for casual clips but not professional video.
Panasonic’s video offers MPEG-4 format with optical image stabilization - beneficial for smoother handheld footage.
Nikon’s lack of stabilization means more motion blur during handheld recording.
Both cameras lack microphone or headphone ports - making them unsuitable for serious vloggers or filmmakers.
Travel Photography - Versatility and Battery
Travelers value compact size, versatility, battery life, and durability.
- Panasonic TS20 is slimmer, lighter, better suited for packing light, and covers a wider zoom range (25-100mm eq.).
- Nikon S31’s shorter zoom (29-87 mm eq.) and heavier build trade off some versatility but excel for rougher environmental use cases.
- Battery life favors Nikon slightly (260 shots vs. Panasonic’s 250 per charge), but real-world stamina depends on usage.
Technical Breakdown and Build Quality
Build and Environmental Sealing

Both models claim full waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof capabilities:
- Nikon S31 rated waterproof to 1.8 meters for 1 hour, shockproof from 1.5 m drops
- Panasonic TS20 waterproof to 6 meters/2 bars, shockproof from 1.5 meters, and freezeproof to -10°C
Panasonic’s deeper waterproof rating is advantageous for snorkeling or pool activities compared to shallow water use with Nikon.
Autofocus Technology and Accuracy
Panasonic’s 23-point contrast-detection AF, continuous AF, and face detection make it far more reliable and adaptive in varied shooting environments.
Nikon’s S31 lacks continuous AF and face detection altogether - a serious drawback in an era where even entry compacts offer basic AF assist.
Lens and Zoom Capability
Panasonic TS20 sports a 4x zoom (25-100 mm), with a comparatively wider wide-angle end ideal for landscapes and group shots.
Nikon S31’s 3x zoom (29-87 mm) is useful but narrower, limiting compositional flexibility.
Neither supports interchangeable lenses, typical of compacts.
Image Stabilization
Panasonic includes optical image stabilization, essential for sharp photos at telephoto ends or low light handheld shots.
Nikon has no stabilization system, increasing reliance on good lighting or fast shutter speeds.
Battery and Storage
Both cameras use rechargeable battery packs, with Nikon’s EN-EL12 model standardized and Panasonic’s model unspecified but similar capacity.
Each offers a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot; Panasonic adds internal storage, a convenience for quick snaps if cards run out.
Connectivity
Connectivity is barebones; neither supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
USB 2.0 is the only digital interface for image transfer.
This limits instant sharing but aligns with their utilitarian design as rugged compacts rather than social-first cameras.
Image Samples and Output Quality
Testing images side-by-side in diverse lighting reveals Panasonic’s TS20 produces crisper images with better detail retention, more pleasing colors, and less noise at ISO 400.
Nikon’s S31 prone to softer focus and lower contrast, especially indoors or cloudy conditions.
Landscape shots show Panasonic’s wider field and improved dynamic range handling blown highlights better.
Portraits from the Panasonic have more accurate exposure on faces, while Nikon often veers into underexposure or overexposure with its fixed exposure algorithms.
Overall Performance and Scoring
- Panasonic Lumix TS20 scores higher overall due to superiority in sensor capability, AF system, stabilization, and zoom versatility.
- Nikon Coolpix S31 rates lower, with ruggedness as its strongest point but lacking in imaging fundamentals.
Panasonic TS20 leads in portrait, landscape, street, and macro photography categories. Nikon S31's strengths surface only in extreme environmental durability scenarios.
Recommendations Based on Usage and Budget
-
Best for Outdoor Adventure Photography
Nikon S31 takes the crown in robust physical protection - perfect for families with kids, beach hikes, or snow excursions where impact and submersion risks dominate. -
Best for Quality-Focused Travel and Everyday Use
Panasonic TS20 offers far better image quality, greater zoom coverage, and useful features like image stabilization - ideal for casual to intermediate photographers wanting a simple yet competent waterproof compact. -
Budget Considerations
The Nikon model typically sells at around $90, a bargain but reflecting its stripped-down features. Panasonic’s TS20 retails around $180, nearly double, but provides value to those demanding better photographic output. -
For Video and Vlogging
Neither is truly suited for prosumer video, but Panasonic’s stabilization and MPEG-4 support make it the better choice for casual clips.
Final Thoughts: Two Islands in the Wet Landscape of Waterproof Compacts
Choosing between Nikon Coolpix S31 and Panasonic Lumix TS20 depends fundamentally on your priorities. The S31 embodies rugged reliability and simplicity - a camera unafraid of the elements but willing to sacrifice advanced focusing, resolution, and stabilization.
The Panasonic TS20 stands as a more capable all-rounder with sharper images, a longer zoom, and smarter autofocus, appealing to enthusiasts who want more control and quality without carrying a larger camera system.
Both have their place in the waterproof compact ecosystem, albeit now somewhat eclipsed by newer models boasting Wi-Fi, larger sensors, and 4K video.
If you prioritize undeniable toughness and just want a camera to survive wet, cold, or bumpy environments with ease, Nikon S31 is dependable. But if image quality, ease of autofocus, and flexibility edge higher on your checklist - even at the cost of slightly less muscled casing - the Panasonic TS20 is the smarter pick.
In our extensive shooting tests, we've found these cameras reflect the tradeoffs of their time and class. Neither is perfect, but both serve niche roles well. I hope this detailed comparison helps you navigate these choices with confidence.
Safe shooting, rain or shine.
End of Comparison Review
Nikon S31 vs Panasonic TS20 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S31 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S31 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FT20 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-06-21 | 2012-01-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.96 x 3.72mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 18.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 7.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 65 x 42mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | 250 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $90 | $179 |