Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310
91 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3.1" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Introduced February 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Nikon S33 versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S33 (13MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the S33 (1/3.1") and TG-310 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S33 was brought out 4 years after the TG-310 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the S33 matches up vs the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S33 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S33 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S33 over the Olympus TG-310
| S33 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon S33
| TG-310 | S33 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S33 and Olympus TG-310
| S33 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon S33 provides outside dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S33 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the S33 against the TG-310.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S33 and TG-310 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S33 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S33 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus TG-310 will produce extra detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent S33 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S33 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S33 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.7 x 3.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 16.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.7fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p), 320 x 240 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 150 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, smile timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $150 | $0 |
