Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
![Nikon Coolpix S3300 front Nikon Coolpix S3300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300/Nikon-S3300-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB700 front Samsung WB700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB700/Samsung-WB700-front.jpg)
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The S3300 was brought out 14 months later than the WB700 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S3300 matches up vs the WB700 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S3300 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S3300 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Samsung WB700
S3300 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | December 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Nikon S3300
WB700 | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Samsung WB700
S3300 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S3300 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S3300 vs the WB700.
![Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Samsung-WB700-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S3300 and WB700 is 96 and 98 respectively.
![Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Samsung-WB700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3300 and WB700.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S3300 to deliver more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer S3300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
![Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Samsung-WB700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Samsung-WB700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/greggs-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Samsung WB700 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128g (0.28 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $99 | $300 |