Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Nikon S5300 and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the S5300 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S5300 was revealed 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the S5300 scores versus the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5300 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S5300 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Samsung SL202
| S5300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Nikon S5300
| SL202 | S5300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Samsung SL202
| S5300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S5300 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S5300 and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S5300 compared to the SL202.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The visual here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S5300 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S5300 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer S5300 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S5300 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Samsung SL202 |
| Other name | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 138g (0.30 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $180 | $140 |