Nikon S570 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Nikon S570 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon Coolpix S570 vs Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS: A Hands-On Compact Camera Showdown
When it comes to compact cameras, the market is a colorful stew of specs, gimmicks, and promise-filled marketing jargon. Having put both the Nikon Coolpix S570 and the Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS through their paces, I realized this comparison isn’t just about pixel counts or megaprices - but understanding what these cameras can actually do behind those numbers. In this deep dive, we’ll dissect their real-world usability, image quality, and which kinds of photographers each is best suited for - not just as cold specs, but through the lens of seasoned experience.

First Impressions: Ergonomics and Build - Pocketability vs Ruggedness
Looking at these two compact point-and-shoots side by side, it’s impossible not to notice their distinct physical personalities. The Nikon S570 is a slim, light little fellow, measuring a trim 92x57x22mm and weighing a mere 140 grams. Its modest footprint makes it an ideal candidate for slipping into pockets or tiny bags - the kind of camera ready to capture everyday moments with minimal fuss.
The Pentax WG-2 GPS, meanwhile, is noticeably chunkier and heavier at 122x61x30mm and 198 grams. But this heft is intentional: the WG-2 GPS proudly wears its ruggedness on its sleeve. Weatherproofing against water, dust, shock, crush, and even freeze conditions means the WG-2 is built for action, not just snapshot convenience.
Ergonomically, Nikon’s S570 offers a straightforward, pillowy grip with nothing extra to slow you down, while the Pentax provides textured surfaces and reinforced corners to ensure a confident hold in all kinds of adventures - from beach trips to mountain climbs.
If you want a camera that politely disappears in your pocket and fits casual day-to-day shooting, the Nikon S570 is your friend. But if you plan on taking your camera swimming, hiking, or generally abusing it as the intrepid photographer you are, the Pentax WG-2 GPS demands serious consideration.

The control layouts also reinforce this dichotomy. The S570 keeps it simple - a compact’s typical handful of buttons and dials that will be familiar to anyone who’s used small compacts before. The WG-2 GPS offers more physical buttons and custom controls, reflecting its appeal to users who want quick access while on the move and can’t afford to fiddle with menus mid-shot.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs BSI-CMOS - The Battle of the Small Sensors
Both cameras house the ever-popular 1/2.3" sensor format, typical for compact cameras: about 6.17x4.55mm in physical size, or roughly 28.07 square millimeters. However, their sensor technologies deviate notably.

The Nikon S570 opts for a CCD sensor with 12MP resolution, while the Pentax WG-2 GPS steps up with a 16MP BSI-CMOS chip. This difference, though seemingly incremental, has meaningful real-world implications.
CCD sensors, as in the Nikon, historically produce pleasing color rendition and good dynamic range, but they tend to struggle with noise at higher ISOs and slower readout speeds - limiting continuous shooting and video performance.
BSI-CMOS sensors like Pentax’s in the WG-2 GPS, meanwhile, enhance low-light sensitivity and speed by reconfiguring the pixel design to collect more light efficiently. This means less noise at ISO 6400 and a potentially wider dynamic range, crucial advantages when shooting in challenging environmental and lighting conditions.
In practice, the Pentax produces cleaner images at ISO settings above 400, which may not sound crucial for casual snaps but is a decisive boon for anyone shooting outdoors, especially in low light or shadow. The Nikon’s maximum ISO caps at 3200, but I recommend keeping it at 100-400 ISO for best results.
Image sharpness and detail retention also favor the Pentax, especially with larger prints or heavy cropping - a benefit of its slightly higher resolution and modern sensor technology.
Viewing and Composing Your Shot: Screen Differences

The Nikon S570 sports a 2.7-inch fixed screen with a resolution of 230k dots - perfectly adequate for framing shots under average conditions but somewhat lacking when viewed in bright sunlight or when critical manual adjustments beckon.
In contrast, the Pentax WG-2 GPS offers a much more vibrant 3.0-inch widescreen TFT LCD with anti-reflective coating and 460k dot resolution. This results in a brighter, clearer image preview and menu navigation experience, which quickly becomes apparent when working outdoors on a sunny day - something photographers like myself greatly appreciate.
Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, which is typical in this category but does limit composition options during bright daylight. You’ll be relying on LCD angle, light shading, or your proverbial squint.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Going Beyond the Basics
Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus; however, the Pentax WG-2 GPS has a few more autofocus tricks up its sleeve.
The Nikon S570 is fairly basic: single autofocus only, no continuous AF tracking, and no face or subject detection. It is functional enough for casual use, particularly stationary subjects, but it can frustrate when photographing moving objects.
The Pentax WG-2 GPS improves matters with nine AF points, center-weighted metering, and face detection capabilities. Additionally, it supports AF tracking, a rare luxury in compacts. While not Michelin-star professional autofocus by any means, it gives you better odds locking focus on wildlife or kids playing sports.
When it comes to shutter speeds, both cameras max out at 1/4000s, but the S570’s minimum is 1/60s versus 4s on the WG-2. The latter’s longer minimum allows for creative slow shutter shots, although neither offers manual exposure modes or priority shooting modes, limiting creative control in this arena.
Continuous shooting is limited: Pentax’s single frame per second burst is slow compared to modern standards, and Nikon doesn’t specify any burst speed (effectively meaning minimal or no continuous shooting).
Macro and Close-Up Capabilities
If your photography interests tilt toward tiny subjects - bugs, flowers, or the enigmatic texture of a mushroom cap - the macro capabilities warrant scrutiny.
The Nikon S570 reaches closest focus at 3cm, which, while passable for casual close-ups, isn’t groundbreaking. The Pentax WG-2 GPS is noticeably better here with a 1cm macro focus range, allowing you to fill the frame with details few others will catch.
I’ve had delightful experiences with the WG-2 GPS in this mode - its ability to lock focus on minute textures made it ideal for tabletop nature studies during a weekend getaway.
Video Quality - Modest by Today’s Standards but Useful
Video on both cameras reflects their compact nature and era.
Nikon S570 shoots HD video at 1280x720 (30 fps), with lower resolutions available, but no advanced video formats or external mic options. Pentax WG-2 GPS upgrades this to full HD 1080p at 30 fps, and 720p at up to 60 fps for smoother slow-motion effects, encoded in H.264/MPEG-4. It also includes an HDMI port, something the Nikon lacks.
Neither model offers 4K video or advanced cinematic features like log profiles or microphone jacks, but for quick travel clips or family videos, the Pentax slightly edges the Nikon in resolution and codec sophistication.
Special Features and Connectivity
Connectivity options are rather basic on both cameras, lacking Bluetooth and NFC; however, the Pentax’s inclusion of Eye-Fi card compatibility offers older wireless image transfer options.
GPS, a nice bonus for travelers who like geotagging photos, is built into the Pentax WG-2 GPS but completely absent on the Nikon.
The lack of RAW support on both is expected in this category - a key limitation for professionals craving maximum post-processing flexibility.
Battery Life and Storage
The Pentax WG-2 GPS’s rated battery life of 260 shots per charge is respectable; the Nikon S570 lacks official battery life specs, but its smaller EN-EL10 battery typically yields fewer shots per charge.
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC storage (with Pentax additionally supporting SDXC cards), plus internal storage options. Neither supports dual slots, so managing space is straightforward but requires attention on longer trips.
Real-World Use Cases and Photography Genres
Having laid out the specs and technical background, let’s steer into how each camera fits various popular shooting styles.
Portrait Photography
Neither camera offers robust portrait-specific features seen in DSLRs or mirrorless models - no aperture priority, manual immersion control, or advanced face/eye detection beyond the Pentax’s basic face AF. The Nikon’s faster max aperture (f/2.7 at wide-angle) in theory could yield better bokeh, but small sensors and fixed lenses limit artistic depth of field.
So, for casual portraits, the WG-2 GPS’s slightly higher resolution and face detection help achieve pleasing results, but those seeking serious portraiture may want to look elsewhere.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prize dynamic range and resolution. Pentax’s 16MP sensor yields larger images with more detail, and the BSI-CMOS sensor’s better low light prowess is beneficial during golden hours.
That said, neither camera features the RAW format, limiting post-processing latitude. Lack of weather sealing on the Nikon S570 is a strike against it for outdoor adventures - whereas the WG-2 GPS’s rugged casing stands tall.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Both cameras aren’t designed with fast action in mind. The sluggish autofocus and low burst frame rates restrict their sports photography value.
However, Pentax’s AF tracking and face detection provide an edge for steady wildlife shots at moderate distances. Nikon falls behind here.
Street Photography
Here, size matters. Nikon’s small, stealthy design and light footprint make it a more comfortable street companion - reducing attention and fatigue during long walks.
Pentax, being bigger and visibly tough, might attract curious stares, undermining candid captures, but shines in harsh environments like beaches or rainy urban outings.
Macro Photography
Pentax’s closer focusing distance and higher resolution clearly trump Nikon’s, beneficial for bug and flower photography brought closer to life in vivid detail.
Night and Astro Photography
Both cameras’ small sensors, limited ISO ceilings and absence of manual exposure controls limit their astrophotography usability. Pentax’s greater light sensitivity (ISO 6400) offers some advantage, but neither is the right tool for serious night sky work.
Video Recording
Pentax offers full HD, higher frame rates, and better codecs than Nikon’s basic HD recording. Although neither model is for professional videographers, Pentax is better equipped for casual video diaries and travelogues.
Travel Photography
Balancing versatility and ruggedness, travel often demands cameras that withstand environmental hazards without sacrificing portability.
Pentax’s rugged design, GPS geotagging, and superior image quality make it a solid adventure companion, though bulkier.
Nikon’s compactness suits minimalist travelers prioritizing light gear who mostly shoot indoors or urban environments.
Professional Workflows
Neither camera supports RAW or advanced color profiles, limiting their professional utility. They also lack tethering, external peripherals, or manual exposure control - a nonstarter for photography professionals.
Technical Summary and Value Proposition
Given their segment, both cameras are simple point-and-shoots, but Pentax WG-2 GPS emerges as the more versatile and technologically advanced compact of the two.
| Feature | Nikon S570 | Pentax WG-2 GPS |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 12MP CCD | 16MP BSI-CMOS |
| Screen | 2.7" 230k dots | 3.0" 460k dots TFT with AR coating |
| Video | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p at 30fps, 720p at 60fps |
| Weather sealing | None | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof |
| Macro focus | 3cm | 1cm |
| AF features | Basic contrast-detect AF | 9-point, face detection, tracking AF |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI, Eye-Fi support, GPS |
| Battery life | Unknown | ~260 shots |
| Price (at launch) | ~$180 | ~$300 |
Which One’s for You? Tailored Recommendations
-
Casual Everyday Shooters & Pocket Snappers: The Nikon Coolpix S570's small size, simple controls, and decent image quality satisfy users wanting a fuss-free option to capture casual family moments or travel souvenirs, especially indoors or urban scenes, and who prize convenience above ruggedness.
-
Outdoor Enthusiasts and Adventure Photographers: The Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS’s robust build, superior sensor, better autofocus, and GPS geotagging position it as an excellent choice for hikers, backpackers, beach-goers, or anyone needing a compact weather-resistant camera that's a bit more future-proof in terms of resolution and video.
-
Macro & Nature Close-Up Fans: Pentax’s closer focusing distance enhances macro explorations, making it the better bet for photographers fascinated by detail work without carrying specialized equipment.
-
Video Hobbyists: The WG-2 GPS leads with true full HD footage and smoother frame rates - ideal for casual movie makers needing solid quality without complex setups.
-
Budget-Conscious Buyers: Nikon S570 is more wallet-friendly and still delivers respectable image quality for non-demanding users.
A Final Word on Compact Cameras in Today’s Market
Remember, both cameras hail from the era before smartphones completely dominated casual photography. While smartphones now provide exceptional image quality and convenience, dedicated cameras like these still carve out niches demanding ruggedness, optical zoom, and certain physical controls or image characteristics better than most phones.
Neither the Nikon S570 nor the Pentax WG-2 GPS will fool pros accustomed to advanced mirrorless or DSLR systems, but for the right user, each compact camera offers a blend of strengths. The WG-2 GPS is the better all-rounder, capturing a wider swath of shooting scenarios, while the S570 remains a light, affordable entry point for those craving honest point-and-shoot simplicity.
If you’re the kind of photographer who values durable gear and improved imaging specs, I’d wholeheartedly recommend taking the Pentax WG-2 GPS on your next adventure. If, however, you want an ultra-portable, budget-friendly travel buddy mainly for quick snaps, the Nikon S570 still brings reliable service decades after its launch.
With that, I hope this comparison arms you with the clarity to choose the compact that best matches your unique photographic journey. Happy shooting!
Nikon S570 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S570 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Pentax |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S570 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-08-04 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-6.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 140 gr (0.31 lb) | 198 gr (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL10 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $180 | $300 |