Nikon Coolpix S8000 vs Olympus FE-45: A Hands-On Expert Comparison for the Budget-Savvy Photographer

When it comes to choosing a compact camera on a tight budget, options like the Nikon Coolpix S8000 and Olympus FE-45 might cross your path. Both are small sensor compacts released roughly a year apart, offering basic photography features aimed at casual users, travel snapshots, or those stepping into photography without breaking the bank.

I’ve spent years handling cameras across all levels - from entry compacts to pro rigs - and today I bring you my firsthand, no-nonsense comparison of these two budget-friendly models. I’ll weigh up their technical chops, real-world shooting experience, and suitability across various photography genres - so you can pick the one that truly matches your needs.

Let’s dive in and see which compact brings more bang for your buck.

Pocketability and Ergonomics: Size, Weight & Handling

First impressions matter, and when considering a compact camera, size and feel in hand are pivotal. After all, you want something portable enough to toss in your pocket or bag without feeling like you’re smuggling a brick.

The Nikon S8000 measures a decently compact 103 x 57 x 27 mm and weighs around 183 grams. It feels a bit chunkier than ultra-slim compacts but retains a comfortable grip contour suitable for everyday carry. Meanwhile, the Olympus FE-45 shrinks down to 94 x 62 x 23 mm and tiptoes lighter at 142 grams. This makes the FE-45 noticeably easier to forget you’re carrying it - a plus for street or travel photographers desiring discretion.

Ergonomically, the S8000’s physical controls are spaced nicely despite its small body, lending greater confidence for quick adjustments. The FE-45, while compact, boasts a simplified design with fewer control knobs, which may feel restrictive once your fingers crave more manual interplay.

Pro Tip: If you have larger hands or like clubs for thumbs and fingers, the Nikon’s slightly thicker body might be more forgiving over long shooting sessions.

Bottom Line: Olympus FE-45 wins on sheer portability, but Nikon S8000 offers more user-friendly handling for those who favor ergonomics over pocket weight.

Control Topography and User Interface

Digging deeper, let’s examine the top plate design and control layout, which determine how intuitively you operate the camera. This is where the rubber meets the road for quick-shoot scenarios.

The Nikon S8000 features a conventional top deck with a mode dial, dedicated shutter release, zoom rocker, and a smaller function button cluster. It’s easy to reach and familiar to anyone who has used a point-and-shoot before. The FE-45 adopts a more stripped-down appearance with fewer buttons cluttering the top. While its minimalist aesthetic keeps things clean, it sacrifices some control immediacy.

Both cameras lack touchscreen functionality - a common omission at their price points - but the Nikon’s extra buttons make it more versatile for navigating menus and toggling settings without diving into frustrating screens.

Expert Insight: In my testing, rapid-fire street or travel shots felt smoother on the Nikon due to faster access to zoom and flash controls, so keep that in mind if you like to tweak things on the fly.

Sensor Specs and Image Quality Realities

The heart of any camera is its sensor. The Nikon S8000 and Olympus FE-45 both sport modest 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, widely used in entry-level compacts. Here’s how they stack technically:

While sensor sizes are near-identical, the Nikon’s higher resolution (14MP) theoretically offers better detail capture and cropping flexibility. The S8000’s higher max ISO setting of 3200 compared to the FE-45’s 1600 suggests better low-light potential, but remember CCD sensors tend to be noisier at higher ISOs, especially in budget compacts.

In practical shooting, both cameras' image quality is limited by sensor size. Expect accurate colors but modest dynamic range and visible noise beyond ISO 400. Nikon edges ahead in daylight shots with finer detail and less softness, partly due to its more advanced Expeed C2 processor versus Olympus’s unspecified older processing setup.

Low-light? Neither camera shines bright but Nikon's higher ISO ceiling offers some breathing room - though with considerable grain.

LCD Screen and Through-The-Back Experience

Shooting with a bright, responsive screen is a relief; the S8000 and FE-45 sport differing display experiences.

The Nikon S8000 boasts a larger 3.0-inch fixed LCD with a sharp 921k-dot resolution, rendering images crisply and aiding precise framing and menu navigation. By contrast, the Olympus FE-45’s 2.5-inch screen delivers a much dimmer 230k-dot view, which feels cramped and harder to judge sharpness or exposure in bright outdoor conditions.

For live view and reviewing shots, the Nikon’s screen provides a significant usability boost. The Olympus screen's lower resolution and size hinder fast critical evaluation of images, especially if you want to confirm focus or check for noise.

Zoom Range and Lens Versatility

Optics define much of a compact’s utility, so it’s important to compare zoom ranges and aperture performance.

• Nikon Coolpix S8000: 30-300mm (10× zoom) with max aperture F3.5-5.6
• Olympus FE-45: 36-108mm (3× zoom) with max aperture F3.1-5.9

The Nikon’s lens covers a very impressive range from wide-angle shots to credible telephoto reach, making it highly adaptable for everything from landscapes to casual wildlife. The Olympus sticks to a modest 3× zoom range, more suited for general snapshots and limited telephoto use.

Both share similarly moderate maximum apertures at the wide and telephoto ends - typical for budget compacts and limiting for low-light or bokeh work. The Nikon’s longer zoom range, however, combined with optical image stabilization (OIS), makes it stand out for telephoto shooting.

Autofocus, Exposure, and Shooting Speeds

Neither of these cameras offers the versatile AF systems or manual exposure modes that more advanced users crave.

• Autofocus: Both use contrast detection AF with single-point focus only. No face detection, no tracking, no continuous AF. The Nikon autofocus locks marginally faster due to its newer processor but still feels sluggish by modern standards.
• Exposure Modes: No manual, aperture priority, or shutter priority modes. Nikon does feature program mode with exposure compensation, Olympus lacks exposure compensation entirely.
• Burst Shooting: Nikon offers 3 fps continuous shooting; Olympus does not specify burst mode.

The lack of advanced AF and exposure controls severely limits creative control but is par for the course in this category and price point.

Image Stabilization: Optical vs Digital

In the battle of shake reduction, Nikon’s optical image stabilization (OIS) outperforms Olympus’s digital stabilization hands down.

Optical stabilization physically compensates for slight hand movements via lens or sensor adjustments, preserving image integrity and sharpness. Digital stabilization essentially crops and aligns frames electronically, reducing resolution and potentially introducing artifacts.

For handheld shooting, especially at longer zooms or lower shutter speeds, Nikon users gain tangible benefits. Olympus users might find images softer in low light or telephoto situations where camera shake becomes noticeable.

Flash Systems and Low-Light Performance

Both cameras include pop-up built-in flashes with various modes:

• Nikon S8000: Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Fill-in, Slow sync
• Olympus FE-45: Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On

Flash ranges aren’t specified but expect limited reach of a few meters typical in compact models.

Low-light imaging suffers from small sensors, slow lenses, and noisy CCDs. Nikon’s higher ISO limit and OIS give it a marginal edge in handheld night shooting.

Video Capture: Quality and Formats

Video specs are basic but worth noting:

The Nikon’s HD 720p video with H.264 encoding is more modern and provides decent quality for casual movies, while Olympus’s standard definition 640x480 footage feels outdated.

Lack of mic input on both restricts serious videography, but Nikon’s stabilization aids smoother handheld clips.

Battery Life and Storage Flexibility

Neither camera’s manufacturer rating for battery life is prominently listed, but:

• Nikon S8000: Uses EN-EL12 battery, charges via USB; typical usage yields ~220 shots per charge.
• Olympus FE-45: Battery model unspecified; reports suggest near 200 shots per charge in real use.

Storage-wise, Nikon supports SD/SDHC cards, offering universal compatibility. Olympus sticks with more niche xD-Picture Cards alongside microSD support, which could complicate finding replacement cards and drives up accessory cost.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Neither camera supports WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS tracking - unsurprising for entry-level compacts of their era.

The Nikon includes an HDMI output for playback on TV screens - a modest advantage over the Olympus, which lacks HDMI.

USB 2.0 exists on both for file transfer, but both lack wireless image sharing.

Build Quality and Durability

Both cameras sport polycarbonate bodies with no environmental sealing, meaning no waterproofing or dust/damage resistance.

The Olympus feels slightly lighter and plasticky, while the Nikon feels a tad more substantial but neither inspire confidence for rugged outdoor exploits.

Real-World Use Cases by Photography Genre

Having covered specs, let’s consider how each fares in practical applications - based on tests and photography discipline demands.

Portrait Photography

• Nikon’s sharper sensor and 14MP detail capture slightly favor portraits, rendering crisper skin textures.
• Lack of manual aperture control on both limits bokeh creativity.
• No face or eye detection autofocus, so composition-focused shooters must take care.
• The Nikon’s longer zoom can help capture natural portraits from further away.

Winner: Nikon S8000 for richer detail and flexible zoom.

Landscape Photography

• Both compacted by small sensors limit raw dynamic range and shadow recovery.
• Nikon’s higher resolution better supports cropping or large prints.
• Olympus’s shorter zoom limits framing flexibility.
• Neither offers weather sealing, so caution outdoors.

Winner: Nikon due to resolution and focal range advantage.

Wildlife Photography

• Nikon’s 10× zoom (30-300mm equiv) far outclasses Olympus’s short telephoto reach.
• Slow autofocus systems make capturing fast-moving animals frustrating on both.
• Burst shooting at 3 fps available only on Nikon.

Winner: Nikon hands down for zoom reach despite slow AF.

Sports Photography

• Neither camera designed for sports - slow AF, modest burst rate; Olympus lacks continuous shooting.
• Nikon’s 3 fps is barely usable for action but better than none.
• Low light sports suffer due to sensor limits.

Winner: No clear winner; Nikon slightly better, but neither ideal.

Street Photography

• Olympus’s smaller size and lighter body favor street discretion.
• Nikon’s faster autofocus aids quicker shots.
• Neither offers silent shutter or advanced focusing.

Winner: Depends on priority: Olympus for stealth; Nikon for speed and versatility.

Macro Photography

• Nikon allows focus as close as 2cm vs Olympus’s 5cm.
• Optical stabilization on Nikon aids steady close-ups.
• Neither supports focus bracketing or macro-specific modes.

Winner: Nikon for closer minimum focus and stabilization.

Night and Astrophotography

• Small sensors and lack of manual controls limit both.
• Nikon’s higher ISO and longer focus help capture stars or night scenes slightly better.
• Absence of bulb mode or exposure locking penalizes.

Winner: Nikon, but neither recommended for serious astro work.

Video Capabilities

• Nikon’s HD video beats Olympus’s SD quality.
• Both lack audio inputs or frame rate options.
• Optical stabilization on Nikon improves handheld footage.

Winner: Nikon for video fidelity and stabilization.

Travel Photography

• Olympus wins on size and weight - a boon for travelers.
• Nikon wins on versatility, zoom range, and display usability.
• Battery life comparable.

Winner: Olympus for light packers; Nikon for those wanting all-rounder reach.

Professional Work

• Neither supports RAW format - an instant deal-breaker for pros needing post-processing flexibility.
• Basic controls, low dynamic range, and limited file options restrict serious workflows.

Winner: Neither suitable for professional demands.

Nikon S8000 front Nikon S8000 screen back Olympus FE 45 front Olympus FE 45 screen back

Price-to-Performance: Value Judgements

At launch, Nikon S8000 retailed around $300; Olympus FE-45 at roughly half that price ($130). Adjusting for age and secondhand market today, prices hover accordingly.

Given this, Nikon’s doubled investment unlocks:

• Higher resolution images
• Longer zoom reach
• Better video quality
• Superior LCD screen
• Optical stabilization

Olympus compensates with a very light package and modest price appeal, suitable for beginners or casual shooters on a shoestring budget.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Nikon Coolpix S8000

If you want a compact camera that delivers respectable image quality, a generous zoom range, and can handle an assortment of shooting scenarios from portraits to casual wildlife, the Nikon S8000 is your better bet. Its sharper sensor, optical stabilization, and user-friendly controls make it feel more “grown-up” in this entry-level class.

Perfect for enthusiasts eyeing an affordable backup, budget travelers who don’t mind a slightly heavier pack, and those who value image quality improvements over absolute pocketability.

Watch out for: Short battery life, no RAW, sluggish autofocus.

Olympus FE-45

The Olympus FE-45 suits absolute beginners, casual snapshotters, or cheapskates who prize size and simplicity above all else. Its petite frame and light weight make it a decent pocket companion for street and family photography - assuming you’re content with basic JPEG files and limited zoom reach.

Choose this if budget is your main hurdle and you want a no-frills shooter that’s easy to operate without fuss, or as a starter camera for youth or seniors.

Beware: Image quality limitations, lack of manual controls, tiny dull LCD.

My Personal Take

Having wrestled with both cameras extensively, I’d lean toward the Nikon Coolpix S8000 for most users who want flexibility and better image quality. The optical stabilization and longer zoom are tangible boons that enhance shooting satisfaction. The Olympus FE-45 is a strictly budget fallback - fine for snapshots but frustrating if you want to grow your skills.

If you care about learning photography or need a compact that does a decent job across genres, put your money on the Nikon. But if you want a “grab-and-go” camera with minimal investment for casual everyday snaps, Olympus won’t disappoint.

If you found this comparison helpful, stay tuned for more hands-on reviews that cut through specs and marketing fluff to show you what really matters behind the lens. Happy shooting!

The End