Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 8010 was manufactured 12 months prior to the VG-110 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the 8010 matches up against the VG-110 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus VG-110
8010 | VG-110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus 8010
VG-110 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Olympus VG-110
8010 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8010 provides physical measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the 8010 compared to the VG-110.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and VG-110 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and VG-110.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus 8010 to provide greater detail due to its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged 8010 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Olympus VG-110 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 105g (0.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $600 | $150 |