Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Released February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look closer at the Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the S800c (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S800c was launched 2 months later than the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S800c matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S800c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S800c Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S800c | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon S800c
| XZ-2 iHS | S800c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 819k | Clearer screen (+101k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| S800c | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 |  | December 2012 | Same generation |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S800c offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S800c compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S800c and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S800c and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S800c featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Nikon S800c will produce more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon S800c vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-02-04 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 819k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 184 gr (0.41 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 140 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $290 | $450 |
