Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Successor is Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Nikon S9300 versus Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the S9300 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S9300 was launched 3 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the S9300 scores versus the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus 9000
S9300 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | May 2009 | More recent by 39 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Nikon S9300
9000 | S9300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus 9000
S9300 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9300 features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9300 versus Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S9300 vs the 9000.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S9300 and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9300 and 9000.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9300 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S9300 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-07-16 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.9fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $249 | $300 |