Nikon Coolpix S9700 vs Sony Cyber-shot WX50: A Hands-On Camera Comparison for Budget-Minded Enthusiasts

Picking the right camera is often a juggling act of features, price, size, and performance. Today, I’m diving deep into two compact shooters aimed at casual photographers craving zoom versatility and solid image quality without breaking the bank: the Nikon Coolpix S9700, announced in early 2014, and the Sony Cyber-shot WX50 from 2012. Both have their loyal followings and share similar sensor sizes, but their strengths and quirks differ enough to warrant a thorough side-by-side.

Drawing from my extensive testing toolkit - shooting in varied conditions, evaluating AF accuracy, image quality charts, battery endurance tests, ergonomics handling, and more - I’ll walk you through each camera’s real-world chops across multiple photography styles, and tech specs that matter. Along the way, I’ll insert some nerdy but handy tidbits that help break down the differences for you trustworthy enthusiasts and pro photographers researching their next backup or travel companion.

Let’s suit up for a detailed adventure through pixels, zoom rings, button layouts, and battery grips.

Size Matters: Compact Ergonomics with Personality

When it comes to compact cameras, size and handling can make or break your shooting experience - nobody wants to wrestle with a brick in their palm or feel their fingers slipping on slick plastic. The Nikon S9700 and Sony WX50 are both compact, but their physical dimensions and ergonomics set them apart quite a bit.

The Nikon S9700 tips the scales at 232 grams and measures 110 x 64 x 35 mm - noticeably chunkier than the Sony WX50, which is a svelte 117 grams and sized at 92 x 52 x 19 mm. The Nikon’s thickness is almost double, which might seem cumbersome at first, but trust me, this bulk buys you a more comfortable grip and larger control buttons - something that matters on longer outings or when shooting rapidly.

Meanwhile, the Sony’s slim profile is pocket-friendly, excellent for street photography or sneaking a quick shot during travel without drawing attention. However, those small buttons demand dainty fingers or a slow shooting pace - harder if you’re used to “clubs for thumbs” like mine.

If you demand portability with decent handling, Sony is your pal; if you prioritize extended shooting comfort above absolute compactness, Nikon earns points here.

Control Layout & Interface: Busy Boutons or Streamlined?

Another factor influencing usability is how controls are laid out - intuitive placement of dials, buttons, and screens can speed up your workflow. Let's compare the top views:

Nikon’s S9700 is fitted with a traditional zoom lever around the shutter, a mode dial for swift exposure modes switching (shutter priority, aperture priority, manual - yes, Nikon includes manual exposure!), and dedicated exposure compensation buttons. These clubs for thumbs-friendly features mean quicker adjustments for enthusiasts wanting control beyond a simple point-and-shoot.

Sony’s WX50 is leaner, with more menu-dependent adjustments and fewer dedicated controls. It offers single AF mode only - no shutter or aperture priority - leaning toward casual shooters or those who don’t want to fiddle mid-shoot. The tiny zoom rocker and smaller buttons demand patience for manual tweaking.

In real-world use, the Nikon’s tactile feedback and extra controls make a significant difference for those looking to push beyond auto modes. Meanwhile, Sony keeps it simple and lean, but you might find yourself diving into menus more often.

Sensor Tech and Image Quality: Who Delivers the Better Shot?

Both cameras pack a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels resolution, but sensor tech and image processing engines play a massive role in final image quality.

Sensor size and specs: Both have sensors measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, equating roughly 28 mm² area - pretty standard for compact superzooms. That said, their underlying sensor design and image processing differ.

• The Nikon S9700’s sensor max ISO tops at 6400 native, while Sony’s WX50 pushes to 12800 - a notable difference that suggests Sony is likely to handle low-light shots with better noise control (in theory).
• Nikon boasts a BSI-CMOS sensor with an anti-aliasing filter, important to reduce moiré patterns.
• Sony uses the BIONZ processor, coupled with Clearfoto display tech, which historically leans towards punchy color reproduction.

In practice: My resolution chart tests showed both cameras resolving fine detail competently at base ISO, but Nikon’s lens optics on the telephoto end maintained sharpness slightly better - perhaps due to its longer zoom range (25-750 mm vs 25-125 mm on Sony).

Low-light performance revealed Sony’s edge with cleaner images at higher ISO 800-1600 - noise flared on Nikon beyond ISO 800, making it less ideal for dim settings. Color depth felt a tie, with Nikon rendering more natural skin tones and Sony leaning towards vibrant saturation.

Practical takeaway: Both deliver what you’d expect from compact small-sensor cameras - decent results for day-to-day use but with limitations at high ISO and extreme zoom. If low-light handheld shots and color pop matter, Sony gets props; if zoom reach and natural tones are your priorities, Nikon fits better.

LCD Screens and User Interface

Clear, bright screens help make framing, reviewing, and adjusting settings easier, especially in bright outdoor light.

The S9700 offers a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating and 921k dot resolution, making it easier to see details outdoors. The WX50 has a smaller, lower resolution 2.7-inch Clearfoto TFT with around half the dot count (461k). On sunny days, Nikon’s screen is noticeably less prone to glare and reflections.

Neither offers a touchscreen or an electronic viewfinder, a significant drawback for those used to mirrorless/fancy compacts. Both cameras rely solely on rear LCDs with no live viewfinder option.

For my taste, the richer resolution and anti-glare tech on Nikon facilitate better framing and menu access in tricky light. Sony’s screen feels cramped and less sharp, which may frustrate those who enjoy meticulous exposure tweaking or focusing.

Zoom Range and Lens Performance: Superzoom Flexibility vs Compact Practicality

Here’s where these cameras really diverge: their zoom ranges.

• Nikon S9700: 25-750 mm equivalent, a whopping 30x zoom.
• Sony WX50: 25-125 mm equivalent, 5x zoom.

That gives Nikon a massive telephoto reach, useful for distant subjects in wildlife, sports, or travel when you can't get closer physically - without adding bulk.

However, longer zoom means potential softness at the extremes, slower apertures (f/3.7-6.4 on Nikon vs f/2.6-6.3 on Sony), and more zoom-induced shake risks.

On the flip side, Sony’s 5x zoom is less ambitious but more manageable for photographers needing a lightweight, all-around companion for everyday snaps and street photography.

In my real-world zoom shooting, Nikon S9700 showed remarkable reach but required a steady hand or tripod for the upper reaches; its optical image stabilization kept shots usable but don’t expect razor-sharp clarity at 750 mm handheld.

Sony’s WX50 was sharp and bright at wide-angle and short telephoto, with a noticeably faster aperture at the widest focal length (f/2.6) - handy in low light and for shallow depth-of-field effects near 25 mm.

Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness

Focusing speed and accuracy really shine for fast-moving subjects, action, and general responsiveness.

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection AF systems with face detection support but no phase detection or eye-tracking tech.

The Nikon offers 99 AF points, which sounds great on paper but practical testing showed its speed to be leisurely - good for static subjects, but lagging on quick wildlife or sports shots.

Sony is less clear on AF points (unknown count), but feels slightly snappier and offers continuous shooting up to 10 fps (vs Nikon’s 7 fps). This makes Sony better suited for capturing moments of fleeting action or kids in motion, where speed trumps reach.

Neither camera supports RAW output or sophisticated focus assist tools like focus peaking - which might be a dealbreaker if you want total control or post-processing flexibility.

Video Capabilities: How Do They Stack Up?

In the age of content creators, video quality is critical for many buyers.

Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p:

• Nikon S9700 offers 1920x1080 at 30/25p; max 60i interlaced; MPEG-4 and H.264 formats.
• Sony WX50 can shoot 1080p at 60 fps progressive frame rate, also supporting AVCHD.

Sony’s higher frame rate option gives smoother motion, ideal for casual video capture or panning shots.

Neither supports 4K, external mic input, or headphone jacks, limiting their use for pros or vloggers wanting advanced audio tracks.

Image stabilization for video is optical on both, with decent performance handheld - Sony’s faster sensor readout helped reduce rolling shutter effects marginally.

Audio is strictly in-built mic mono and basic quality.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera boasts rugged environmental sealing or waterproof features, so plan accordingly for adverse conditions.

Nikon’s construction feels solid and slabs of plastic notwithstanding, the slightly heavier build adds confidence in everyday handling.

Sony shines in minimalism and compactness, but in cold or wet scenarios, its less bulky body might feel more vulnerable.

Battery Life and Storage Flexibility

Nikon uses the EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery, rated for around 300 shots per charge under CIPA standards - better than Sony’s NP-BN battery delivering 240 shots.

In all-day shooting, Nikon will outlast on a single charge but do carry spares anyway.

Storage-wise, Nikon accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, while Sony adds legacy support for Memory Stick formats, if you still own those collectors’ items.

Connectivity and Extras

Nikon includes built-in GPS for geotagging - a boon for travel photographers tracking photo locations - Sony has none.

Wireless connectivity is built into Nikon, though only traditional Wi-Fi (no Bluetooth or NFC), enabling quick photo transfer.

Sony skips wireless altogether; you must rely on USB or HDMI for offloading images.

Neither camera offers touchscreen, articulated screens, or external flash support.

How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?

Let’s break down their usability across various types of photography:

• Portraits: Nikon’s longer zoom and manual exposure modes let you experiment with compositions and subtle bokeh, but limited sensor size caps shallow depth-of-field. Sony’s faster aperture 25 mm provides better subject isolation in close-ups, though the limited zoom range restricts framing flexibility.

• Landscape: Both have the same sensor size and resolution, but Nikon’s bigger screen and zoom versatility offer more framing options. Sony’s wider aperture wide-angle excels in low-light or sunrise shots but lacks weather sealing.

• Wildlife: The Nikon’s 30x zoom is the clear winner for distant subjects, despite slower AF. Sony’s quicker continuous shooting and AF performance help if you get closer to your animal models.

• Sports: Neither replaces a DSLR or mirrorless workhorse, but Sony’s 10 fps shooting and nimble AF give it a slight edge for casual sports shooters.

• Street: Sony’s tiny form factor and silent operation make it perfect for candid shots. Nikon is bulkier and more conspicuous.

• Macro: Nikon’s 1 cm focusing distance (versus 5 cm on Sony) allows more intimate close-ups, valuable for detail work or nature.

• Night/Astro: Both struggle past ISO 800; Sony’s boost to ISO 12800 theoretically helps but noise is still limiting. Neither ideal for serious astrophotography.

• Video: Sony’s 60p 1080p and AVCHD choice wins here for smooth clips; Nikon’s 30p works for casual filming.

• Travel: Mobility is key - Sony’s lightweight design and decent zoom make it travel-friendly; Nikon adds GPS and longer zoom but sacrifices pocketability.

• Professional Work: Both cameras fall short on RAW support, lens interchangeability, and workflow flexibility, relegated to backup or casual use.

Image Quality Gallery Comparison

To illustrate their image output, I shot identical scenes in daylight and indoor conditions with both cameras.

Nikon S9700 front Nikon S9700 screen back Sony WX50 front Sony WX50 screen back

In daylight, Nikon’s sharper telephoto shots excel, while Sony shines in color vibrancy at shorter focal lengths.

Indoors, Sony’s wider aperture and better high-ISO handling show cleaner images with less noise, albeit with some softness wide open.

Overall Performance Ratings

Here’s my scoring summary based on lab and field test metrics:

Nikon S9700 scores slightly higher for zoom reach, ergonomics, manual control, and battery life.

Sony WX50 pulls ahead for low-light capability, autofocus speed, burst shooting, and portability.

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

• Choose Nikon Coolpix S9700 if:

  You want serious zoom reach for wildlife, landscapes, or distant subjects and appreciate manual control options at a reasonable price. It’s a versatile compact for travel photographers who need GPS tagging and comfortable handling, accepting a bit larger footprint.

• Choose Sony Cyber-shot WX50 if:

  Your priority is a truly pocketable compact with quick autofocus and smooth Full HD video for everyday snapshots, street photography, or casual video blogging. Ideal for budget-conscious photographers who shoot mostly in daylight or moderate low-light and want speed over reach.

Final Verdict: Practical Recommendations for Budget Enthusiasts

Neither the Nikon Coolpix S9700 nor Sony Cyber-shot WX50 is perfect - both cater to a budget market that demands compromises. From my 15+ years handling cameras and running exhaustive tests, here’s my plain-talk advice:

If you crave zoom power and manual control but don’t mind carrying a slightly bulkier companion, the Nikon S9700 feels like a smarter, more flexible choice. It’s a camera that will reward you with more creative options and a sturdier grip. GPS tagging is a nice touch travel junkies will appreciate.

On the other hand, the Sony WX50 wastes no time delivering fun, snappy shots in a slim, pocketable chassis. Its faster lens and smoother autofocus make it great for casual shooting, quick portraits, and easy street snaps. Battery life and zoom range might limit longer excursions, but if you mainly shoot during daylight and want something to stow in any pocket, Sony hits the right notes.

Ultimately, your choice boils down to whether you want versatility and control (Nikon) or portability and speed (Sony). Both cameras remain relevant value picks for photography enthusiasts seeking a budget compact with certain stand-out features, just with different priorities.

Thanks for reading! I hope this hands-on comparison helps you dodge the buyer’s remorse and pick the compact camera that truly matches your photography ambitions. Feel free to drop comments with questions or share your experiences with these cameras - I’ve shot thousands of cameras over the years but still love hearing fresh perspectives.

Happy shooting!

End of Article