Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VH-515, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe S9900 was brought out 2 years later than the VH-515 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S9900 grades against the VH-515 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus VH-515
S9900 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | August 2012 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Nikon S9900
VH-515 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus VH-515
S9900 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9900 comes with outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the S9900 vs the VH-515.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and VH-515 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and VH-515.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon S9900 to give you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher S9900 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VH-515 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $648 |