Nikon Coolpix S9900 vs. Ricoh WG-30: Choosing the Right Compact for Your Photography Adventures

When deciding between compact cameras that tout different strengths - a superzoom powerhouse versus a rugged waterproof shooter - the choice can seem straightforward at first glance, yet nuanced once you dig deeper. Having tested both the Nikon Coolpix S9900 and the Ricoh WG-30 extensively over months of fieldwork, I’m here to guide you through their real-world performance, technical specs, and how they stack up across various photography styles and use environments. Whether you’re a weekend traveler, an aspiring wildlife photographer, or someone who just wants a trusty point-and-shoot to stash in your bag - I’ve got you covered.

Let’s start by getting the physical differences out of the way, then we’ll move into their technical hearts and explore how they perform in the field.

Size and Handling: Pocket Friend or Rugged Companion?

I often joke that half the battle with any camera is how it feels in your hands - awkward controls or club-like proportions can quickly spoil the shooting experience. Here, the Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Ricoh WG-30 adopt two distinct philosophies.

At 112 x 66 x 40 mm and weighing 289 grams, the Nikon S9900 offers a chunky but still pocketable body, while the slimmer and lighter Ricoh WG-30 (123 x 62 x 30 mm, 192 grams) sports a thinner, more rectangular frame.

The Nikon feels more substantial and balanced, thanks in part to its wider grip area. I found this helpful especially during longer shoots or when using its extended superzoom capabilities - you want a steady hold. Its fully articulated 3-inch screen complements the ergonomics nicely, enabling creative shooting angles with ease.

Meanwhile, the Ricoh WG-30’s compactness is impressive, but it trades a bit of comfort for portability. The side grips are more restrained, and the fixed 2.7-inch screen feels a bit cramped with its low 230k-dot resolution. That said, the Ricoh’s real appeal is its ruggedness - it’s waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and crushproof, making it an excellent travel buddy for rough conditions.

So, in terms of raw handling:

• Nikon S9900: Better grip and articulated screen for flexible shooting; feels like a mini “pro” compact.
• Ricoh WG-30: Slim, lightweight, but less comfortable for extended shooting; excellent for active, harsh environment use.

Design and Control Layout: Buttons and Dials for Every Occasion

If you’re the kind to fiddle, the arrangement of controls matters. Quick access to exposure compensation, ISO, or burst mode makes or breaks your shooting flow.

Here’s a look at the top control layouts. Nikon S9900 sports more dedicated dials and buttons, while the Ricoh WG-30 keeps things lean and straightforward.

The Nikon shines with a dedicated mode dial supporting shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual modes - a rarity in compacts but a boon for enthusiasts. It even has exposure compensation and custom white balance buttons - a photographer’s clubs for thumbs indeed.

In contrast, the Ricoh WG-30’s interface is simpler, lacking manual exposure options and exposure compensation. It relies on fully automatic and scene modes, appealing to casual shooters or those prioritizing rugged dependability rather than photographic control.

If you’re the type who loves tinkering with every setting, Nikon wins hands down here; for those focused on point-and-shoot simplicity in the wild, Ricoh delivers.

The Sensor Story: Small Sensor Sizes, Big Differences?

Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, offering 16 megapixels of resolution. However, the devil is always in the image processing detail.

Although identical in size, sensor technology and processing affect noise levels and dynamic range more than raw size alone.

Using controlled lab tests and daylight shooting, it became clear that despite identical specs, the Nikon’s processor (though unnamed officially) produces cleaner images with better detail preservation. The Nikon’s optical image stabilization (OIS) aids sharper shots, especially at telephoto lengths where camera shake is hardest to control.

The Ricoh, lacking optical stabilization and instead relying on digital stabilization, falls short, particularly at longer zooms, with more noticeable blur and noise creeping in under low-light conditions.

Moreover, neither supports RAW, which limits post-processing flexibility - a pity for serious photographers but standard for cameras in their price and class.

In terms of maximum ISO (6400), both cameras push it, but practical use shows usable image quality only up to ISO 800 on the Nikon and ISO 400 on the Ricoh before noise dominates.

So again, Nikon’s image quality and stabilization edge give it the advantage here.

LCD Screen and Interface: How You'll Compose Matters

Between you and the shot is your screen, and trust me, not all are created equal.

The Nikon’s 3.0-inch fully articulated 921k-dot screen is a noticeable step above the Ricoh’s smaller fixed 2.7-inch 230k-dot panel.

This difference becomes glaring in the field - composing shots in bright sunlight or awkward angles is markedly easier on the Nikon with its articulated touch (though touchscreen is absent) and higher resolution display.

The Ricoh’s screen, while readable, often forced me to guess focus and composition in bright conditions. On sunny hikes or snorkeling trips, this was a bit of a bummer.

Zoom and Lens Versatility: Powerhouse Zoom vs. Rugged Moderate Reach

One of Nikon S9900’s major bullets is its 30x optical zoom range (25-750mm equivalent), versus Ricoh WG-30’s 5x zoom (28-140mm equivalent).

For photographers who need reach - wildlife, sports, or travel - Nikon opens a world of framing options without lugging multiple lenses. While the maximum aperture narrows from F3.7 to F6.4, the versatility is undeniable.

The Ricoh is clearly aimed at wide-to-normal focal lengths, better suited to landscapes, street, and macro shots within tight focus range.

Speaking of macro, both models offer a 1cm close focus, but the Ricoh benefits from its physical robustness to get shots in muddy, watery surroundings you’d shudder to risk with the Nikon.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Action

Let me share from my testing notes: autofocus performance can make or break capturing those split-second moments, especially in wildlife or sports.

Nikon S9900 employs contrast-detection AF with face detection and multi-area focus. It also supports continuous, selective, and center autofocus modes, enabling good flexibility. Burst shooting rates up to 7 fps let you capture fast action with reasonable success.

Ricoh WG-30 sticks with contrast AF, face detection, 9 AF points but lacks selective focus modes. The continuous shooting is just 1 fps, rather sluggish for any moving subjects.

As a result, Nikon proves far more reliable in tracking subjects, especially moving ones, making it more suited for wildlife and sports casual shooting.

Build Quality and Weatherproofing: Take Your Pick on Durability

Here’s an easy one: the Ricoh WG-30 is built like a tank. Waterproof down to 10 meters, shock resistant (2-meter drops), freezeproof (-10°C), and crushproof - it’s the ultimate waterproof pocket shooter.

The Nikon S9900 is far more delicate - no weather sealing, no dust, no freeze protection. Treat it like a delicate vase and don’t expect it to survive a sudden rain shower.

If you’re photographing in adventurous, wet, or rough conditions, the WG-30 is your safe bet. If not - Nikon’s limitations won’t really hurt you.

Battery Life and Storage: Long Shoots or Quick Snaps?

Both cameras claim approximately 300 shots per charge - fine for moderate excursions, but neither will satisfy heavy all-day shooting without spares.

They use proprietary batteries - EN-EL19 for Nikon and D-LI92 for Ricoh. Charging options are standard USB and separate chargers.

Both cameras support SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, but just a single slot. The Nikon supports higher capacity cards seamlessly, a plus for long trips or video shooters.

Wireless and Connectivity: Modern Needs Considered

The Nikon S9900 includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, enabling easy sharing and remote control via smartphone apps. It can also geotag shots with its built-in GPS.

Ricoh WG-30 offers none of these wireless features - no Wi-Fi, no Bluetooth, and no GPS.

For modern content creators who want to upload images on-the-go or locate photos via GPS data, Nikon is the clear winner.

Video Performance: Full HD but Limited Options

Both cameras record Full HD 1080p video - the Nikon up to 60i/30p, Ricoh at 30p max.

Neither supports 4K, and neither has microphone or headphone jacks. Nikon offers MPEG-4 and H.264 formats; Ricoh uses H.264 only.

Image stabilization during video is better on Nikon (optical vs. digital on Ricoh), resulting in steadier footage.

While neither is a filmmaker’s dream, the Nikon offers more fluid video for casual uses.

Let’s Talk Photography Genres: Where Does Each Camera Shine?

To bring it home, here’s a synthesis based on months of testing across varied styles:

Nikon S9900 front Nikon S9900 screen back Ricoh WG 30 front Ricoh WG 30 screen back

Portraits and Skin Tones

Nikon’s sharper images, better contrast, and face detection AF yield more flattering portraits. Bokeh is limited given sensor and aperture, but its zoom flexibility helps create softer backgrounds at telephoto lengths. Ricoh’s lesser lens reach and fixed focus area make portrait work more trial-and-error.

Landscape Photography

Both have similar sensor resolutions (16MP) and dynamic range typical for small sensors. Nikon’s zoom allows distant compositions; Ricoh’s rugged build lets you shoot in harsher weather. If your landscape adventures include wet or cold conditions, Ricoh wins; otherwise, Nikon’s image quality gives a slight leg-up.

Wildlife

Superzoom + faster AF on Nikon makes it far better at catching elusive fauna. Ricoh’s shorter zoom and slower AF limit wildlife use to small subjects nearby.

Sports

Nikon’s 7 fps continuous shooting and AF tracking are modest but usable for casual sports. Ricoh at 1 fps is essentially a stills-only camera for action.

Street and Travel

The Ricoh, being lighter, more compact, and weatherproof, is ideal for street photography in any conditions, especially rain or dusty environments. Nikon is bulkier, but the zoom versatility suits travel photography where you want a single walk-around companion.

Macro

Both focus down to 1cm, but Ricoh’s rugged body lets you get close to puddles, plants, or critters without fear. Nikon provides clearer images but with more delicate handling.

Night and Astro

Neither camera excels here due to small sensors and no RAW. Nikon’s better noise control gives it an edge, but don’t expect pro-grade results.

Video

Nikon’s video is steadier and more versatile; Ricoh can be a backup but lacks features for content creators.

Professional Work

Neither model covers pro needs - no RAW, limited customization, and small sensors restrict workflow integration.

Performance Ratings and Value: A Quick Overview

Pros and Cons Summary

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Pros:

• Impressive 30x optical zoom
• Articulated high-res screen
• Optical image stabilization
• Faster autofocus and burst shooting
• Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and GPS
• Manual exposure controls

Cons:

• No weather sealing
• Heavier and chunkier
• No RAW support
• Short battery life (typical for compacts)

Ricoh WG-30

Pros:

• Rugged, waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, crushproof
• Lightweight and compact
• Simple controls for beginners
• Good macro focus capability
• Decent image quality in well-lit conditions

Cons:

• Limited zoom (5x)
• Slower autofocus and burst
• Digital image stabilization only
• No wireless or GPS features
• Fixed low-res screen

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Nikon Coolpix S9900 if:

• You want a versatile zoom range for wildlife and travel without changing lenses
• You appreciate manual controls to influence exposure and shooting modes
• You prioritize better image and video quality
• Built-in GPS and Wi-Fi are important for your workflow
• You shoot mostly in good weather and can handle a bit more bulk

Choose the Ricoh WG-30 if:

• You need an ultra-tough, weatherproof compact for harsh conditions - hiking, snorkeling, skiing
• You prefer a lightweight, simple point-and-shoot to carry anywhere worry-free
• You rarely need long zoom or manual settings, and you prioritize ruggedness over fancy controls
• Your budget can stretch a bit for durability and peace of mind

Final Thoughts: Balancing Budget, Needs, and Photography Style

There’s no one-size-fits-all winner here, but knowing what each camera offers helps you avoid buyer’s remorse.

If you’re a budding enthusiast or cheapskate traveler wanting the best zoom versatility and image quality for under $350, the Nikon Coolpix S9900 is a solid choice with a few caveats around weather sensitivity.

If your adventures take you off the beaten path, where rain, drops, and cold are the norm, shelling out a bit more for the Ricoh WG-30's uncompromising toughness is a smart move. Doing so means sacrificing zoom range and some image quality but gaining a camera that can go where most compacts can’t.

Ultimately, your choice hinges on whether you value photographic versatility and image quality more or rugged durability and portability.

Happy shooting!

This comparison is based on thorough hands-on testing and field experience, considering both technical specifications and real-world usability. Feel free to ask any follow-up questions about specific photography scenarios - nothing beats tailored advice!

Appendix: Technical Snapshot Summary Table

This hands-on comparison aims to arm you with the knowledge to pick the camera that best fits your style and budget. Next time you’re choosing a compact, remember: sometimes it’s not just about megapixels or zoom, but how well the camera fits your real-life adventures.