Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX3 was revealed 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX3 scores versus the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CX3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh CX3
| WG-M1 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 51 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-M1
| CX3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 comes with outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 vs the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to result in greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older CX3 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $2,000 |