Nikon W300 vs Sony W620
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Nikon W300 vs Sony W620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Nikon Coolpix W300 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620: A Hands-On Compact Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
When it comes to compact cameras, your choice boils down to what you want to capture and how you plan to use your gear. The Nikon Coolpix W300 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 are both compact, approachable cameras, but they cater to very different users. With the W300, Nikon offers a rugged, waterproof shooter aimed at adventurous creatives, while Sony’s W620 leans toward straightforward, travel-friendly point-and-shoot photography.
Having rigorously tested thousands of digital cameras in the field, we’ll break down how these two models stack up in real-world use. Along the way, we’ll explore technical factors like sensor quality and autofocus, practical performance in different photography disciplines, and value for your budget. Whether you're a beginner looking for a reliable compact or a pro needing specific rugged features, this comparison will help you find the camera that fits your creative journey best.
Before we dive in, let’s glance at their relative physical size and ergonomics - an often overlooked but crucial part of daily usability.
Size and Ergonomics: Handling and Portability Matter

Both cameras are compact, but the Nikon W300 is notably larger and more substantial than the Sony W620:
- Nikon Coolpix W300: 112 × 66 × 29 mm, 231g (with built-in battery)
- Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620: 98 × 56 × 20 mm, 116g
The W300’s bigger body provides a firmer grip and extra durability, which we found especially valuable when shooting outdoors or underwater. Despite the added bulk, it still fits comfortably in a jacket pocket or small bag, ideal for active travel photographers. In contrast, the W620’s ultra-lightweight, slim design is highly pocketable, making it a perfect grab-and-go for casual street or family photography.
Button layout and control schemes also differ, with Nikon favoring tactile, waterproof buttons, while Sony opts for a minimalistic, straightforward interface.
Control Layout and User Interface: Ready When Inspiration Strikes

Looking from above, the W300 offers more dedicated buttons and a robust mode dial, giving quicker access to essential features like underwater shooting modes and GPS tagging. This fits an adventurous workflow, letting you make swift adjustments without diving deep into menus.
The Sony W620, on the other hand, keeps it simple with a smaller shutter release and menu button cluster. While it simplifies operations for casual users, it can feel limiting when you want more shooting flexibility or quicker fine-tuning.
For photographers who value direct control and responsive handling in active situations, the W300 clearly leads here.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Bigger Sensor Means Better Image Potential

Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch sensor measuring 6.17 × 4.55 mm, common for compacts but with differences:
| Feature | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 14 MP |
| Maximum ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max Image Resolution | 4608 × 3456 | 4320 × 3240 |
While sensor size is technically equal, the Nikon W300’s CMOS sensor offers clear advantages in dynamic range and noise control compared to the Sony’s CCD sensor, well known for producing more noise at higher ISO settings. In practical terms, this means the W300 can handle low-light and night scenes with better clarity, less grain, and improved color fidelity.
The higher maximum ISO of the W300 (6400 vs. 3200) expands your creative freedom in dim environments, a critical factor in genres like night or wildlife photography.
Display and Image Review: Clarity and Interface for Crafting Your Shots

Screen resolution and size contribute directly to framing and reviewing images:
- Nikon W300: 3-inch, 921k-dot fixed LCD
- Sony W620: 2.7-inch, 230k-dot fixed LCD (Clear Photo TFT LCD)
The W300’s sharper, larger screen makes a noticeable difference in bright outdoor conditions where the LCD must combat glare. The richer resolution aids in assessing focus and exposure, reducing frustrating trips back to the computer for inspection.
Unfortunately, neither camera offers touchscreen control, but the W300’s responsive buttons compensate well, especially in wet or gloved-hand scenarios.
Autofocus Capabilities: Keeping Moving Subjects Sharp
For any photographer shooting more than static subjects, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy are critical:
| Feature | Nikon W300 | Sony W620 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Number of Focus Points | Unknown | Unknown |
The Nikon W300 stands out with continuous autofocus (AF-C) and real-time face detection - features we tested extensively in fast-action scenes like wildlife and sports. The W300 tracks moving subjects smoothly, maintaining focus during bursts up to 7 fps.
Conversely, the Sony W620 lacks continuous AF, limiting its ability to keep fast or unpredictable subjects sharp during motion, making it more suited for static or casual snapshots.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Toughest Conditions
With many cameras in this category, you trade durability for portability; not here.
-
Nikon Coolpix W300:
- Waterproof to 30m
- Shockproof from 2.4m drops
- Freezeproof to -10°C
- Dustproof
-
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620:
- No environmental sealing or rugged features
The W300’s rugged construction is a defining attribute and ideal if you shoot hiking, scuba diving, or extreme travel, offering peace of mind handling wet, dusty, or cold environments. The Sony is best kept dry and safe in gentler scenarios.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility vs. Flexibility
Both cameras sports fixed 5x optical zoom lenses but with slight differences in focal length and aperture:
| Aspect | Nikon W300 | Sony W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-120mm equivalent | 28-140mm equivalent |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 (wide) to f/4.9 (tele) | f/3.2 (wide) to f/6.5 (tele) |
| Macro Focus | 1 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical Vibration Reduction | No stabilization |
The W300’s wider starting angle (24mm vs 28mm) delivers more expansive framing - great for landscapes and interiors. Its faster maximum aperture, especially at wide angles, helps gather more light, improving performance in low-light or indoor conditions.
The considerable macro advantage of the W300 (focusing down to 1 cm vs Sony’s 5 cm) makes it more capable for close-up and nature shots.
Built-in optical image stabilization (OIS) in the W300 significantly aids handheld shooting, particularly noticeable when zoomed or in dim lighting. The Sony W620’s omission of image stabilization means you’re more likely to get blur from camera shake, especially in low light.
Burst and Shutter Performance: Capturing the Moment
If you shoot action - be it kids, sports, or wildlife - frame rate and shutter speed range matter:
| Parameter | Nikon W300 | Sony W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Continuous Shooting | 7 fps | 1 fps |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/1600 s |
| Min Shutter Speed | 1 s | 2 s |
| Silent Shutter | No | No |
The Nikon W300’s ability to shoot seven full-resolution frames per second with continuous focusing provides a real edge when chasing moving subjects. The faster max shutter speed (1/4000s) enables capturing fast action with less blur or shooting wide-open at bright apertures.
Sony’s W620 is limited to a single shot per second continuous burst, restrictive for capturing fleeting moments.
Video Capabilities: Modern Features for Storytellers
| Feature | Nikon W300 | Sony W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 4K UHD (3840x2160) @ 30fps | 720p HD (1280x720) @ 30fps |
| Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264, AAC audio | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Port | No | No |
| Stabilization | Optical image stabilization | None |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes | No |
The Nikon W300 is clearly superior as a modern video tool. Native 4K recording at 30 fps delivers crisp, detailed footage for vloggers and hybrid shooters. Optical IS further smooths handheld clips, especially outdoors.
While neither supports external mics, having 4K video and built-in stabilization is a big advantage.
Sony W620’s limited 720p video with dated compression and no stabilization falls short of today’s standards, suitable only for casual, quick clips.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered on the Go
-
Nikon Coolpix W300:
- Battery: EN-EL12 (built-in, rechargeable)
- CIPA rating: ~280 shots per charge
- Storage: SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot
-
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620:
- Battery: NP-BN (removable)
- CIPA rating: ~220 shots per charge
- Storage: SD/SDHC/SDXC, memory stick slots
In hands-on use, the W300’s higher rated shots per charge and robust battery hold up well during trips, although heavier usage with GPS and Wi-Fi shortens battery life. The internal battery means you can’t swap batteries mid-shoot without charging gear.
Sony’s smaller battery and more limited capacity fit its travel-friendly size. The removable battery gives some flexibility, but shorter life was noticeable in prolonged use.
Both rely on a single storage card slot, but Sony’s multiple card format support is a bonus if you have used memory stick media from other Sony devices.
Connectivity and Smart Features: Sharing Made Easy
| Feature | Nikon W300 | Sony W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Built-in | Eye-Fi enabled (via SD card) |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Yes | No |
The W300’s integrated GPS lets you geotag photos, a big plus for travel and adventure photographers who want to archive locations effortlessly. Bluetooth plus Wi-Fi enable quick image uploads and remote camera control via Nikon’s SnapBridge app.
Sony’s W620 depends on Eye-Fi SD cards for wireless transfer - an older technology limiting convenience and requiring proprietary cards. The lack of HDMI output also restricts easy screen sharing or external display viewing.
Putting It All Together: Performance Across Photography Genres
Based on thorough tests, here’s how each camera performs in key photographic disciplines:
| Photography Type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Good - Face detection, natural skin tones, usable bokeh | Fair - Limited aperture, weaker AF |
| Landscape | Good - Wide lens, weatherproof, good dynamic range | Basic - Limited dynamic range, no weather sealing |
| Wildlife | Fair - Decent AF and burst | Poor - Slow AF, single shot only |
| Sports | Fair - 7 fps burst, decent shutter speed | Poor - 1 fps only, slow shutter |
| Street | Average - Larger size may hinder discretion | Good - Small, quiet for discreet shooting |
| Macro | Good - 1 cm close focus, sharp detail | Fair - 5 cm macro, limited detail |
| Night/Astro | Good - High ISO, long exposure | Poor - Noise, low max ISO |
| Video | Excellent - 4K video, IS | Basic - 720p, no IS |
| Travel | Excellent - Waterproof, GPS, durability | Good - Lightweight, pocketable |
| Professional Work | Fair - No RAW, limited manual control | Poor - No RAW, limited features |
Sample Images and Real-World Differences
From our test images, the Nikon W300 delivers noticeably sharper detail, better color accuracy, and cleaner noise control at higher ISO. Skin tones appear warmer and more natural, enhancing portrait work, while landscapes retain good dynamic range without blown highlights.
The Sony W620 produces softer images with less detail, and colors can appear muted, especially indoors. Its narrow aperture limits background blur, so portrait images appear flatter with less subject separation.
Both cameras perform adequately in bright daylight but diverge significantly under challenging lighting.
Overall Performance Ratings
Summarizing overall impressions from optical performance, build, and usability:
- Nikon W300: 8/10 - Solid rugged design, versatile image and video features, well-suited for outdoor enthusiasts.
- Sony W620: 5/10 - Compact and lightweight but limited focus, zoom, and imaging capabilities.
Who Should Buy Each Camera?
Choose the Nikon Coolpix W300 if:
- You want a waterproof, shockproof camera for adventurous trips
- You need 4K video and good low-light performance
- You shoot active subjects like wildlife, sports, or underwater scenes
- You value weather sealing and ruggedness without carrying larger gear
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 if:
- You want an ultra-lightweight, slim camera for casual travel or street photography
- Your use is predominantly well-lit, everyday snapshots
- Battery life and simplicity are more important than advanced features
- You are on a tight budget and want a no-frills compact camera
Final Thoughts: Expertise-Based Guidance
Both the Nikon W300 and Sony W620 fill important niches, but their core differences really stand out once tested in the field.
The W300’s rugged blend of strong sensor technology, fast continuous autofocus, environmental sealing, and 4K video makes it an excellent tool for dedicated enthusiasts and creatives exploring outdoors, macro, and action photography. It’s a capable companion for demanding conditions, with enough modern connectivity to fit a mobile workflow.
Sony’s W620 is better viewed as a lightweight, pocket-friendly snapshot tool. It’s fine for casual users focused on bright, everyday photography but lacks the advanced features and durability certain enthusiasts crave. Its older technology shows in lower resolution screens, slower AF, and limited video.
If your photography journey includes regular adventures, travel, or specialized genres like wildlife or macro, the Nikon W300 offers significantly more versatility and future-proofing. For budget-minded beginners prioritizing portability and simplicity, Sony’s W620 holds a place as a simple point-and-shoot.
Before committing, we always recommend hands-on trials to assess comfort and interface workflow matched to how you shoot. Both cameras have strengths, but knowing exactly what you want to capture and where will steer you to the right choice.
Explore More
If you decide on the Nikon W300, look into waterproof housing accessories and compatible wide-angle attachments to extend its creative possibilities. For the Sony W620, consider complementary gear like compact tripods or external flash units to boost performance.
Check out our detailed single-camera reviews and sample image galleries for further inspiration and real-world insights to elevate your photography no matter which compact camera you choose.
This expert comparison leverages years of hands-on testing and deep technical understanding to help you make a confident decision suitable for your photographic style and aspirations. Embrace the tools that empower your creative vision and tell your story through compelling images.
Happy shooting!
Nikon W300 vs Sony W620 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.2-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 220 images |
| Battery format | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $387 | $102 |