Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D
69 Imaging
66 Features
72 Overall
68
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 430g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
- Revealed April 2014
- Superseded the Nikon D3200
- New Model is Nikon D3400
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Succeeded the Pentax K100D S
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by companies Nikon and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the D3300 (24MP) and K200D (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe D3300 was introduced 5 years later than the K200D and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the D3300 grades vs the K200D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon D3300 & Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Nikon D3300 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3300 over the Pentax K200D
| D3300 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2014 |  | September 2008 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Nikon D3300
| K200D | D3300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3300 and Pentax K200D
| D3300 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon D3300 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 430 grams (0.95 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") having a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the D3300 vs the K200D.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the D3300 and K200D is 69 and 61 respectively.
Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D3300 and K200D.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon D3300 to produce greater detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger D3300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon D3300 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Nikon D3300 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Pentax |
| Model | Nikon D3300 | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2014-04-21 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 309 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD (160 degree viewing angle) | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 430 gr (0.95 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 82 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.3 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 1385 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 700 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL14a | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $500 | $600 |
