Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5500
72 Imaging
68 Features
70 Overall
68


71 Imaging
65 Features
85 Overall
73
Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 365g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
- Launched August 2018
- Replaced the Nikon D3400
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 420g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
- Announced January 2015
- Superseded the Nikon D5300
- Later Model is Nikon D5600

Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5500: Which Entry-Level DSLR Should You Choose in 2024?
When it comes to stepping into the world of DSLR photography without breaking the bank, Nikon's lineup has long been a favorite for enthusiasts and newcomers alike. Today, I'm taking a close look at two popular models from Nikon’s entry-level arsenal - the Nikon D3500 and the Nikon D5500. Both are APS-C format DSLRs that offer solid image quality, intuitive operation, and respectable features for their price tags, but the differences between them may impact your decision depending on your photographic needs and shooting style.
Having spent countless hours testing and comparing cameras, here’s a down-to-earth, detailed comparison of these two bodies from a hands-on perspective. I’ll dissect their specs, real-world performance, shooting disciplines, and value for money - helping you decide which Nikon DSLR deserves a spot in your bag.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Size, Weight & Handling
Before diving into tech specs, the feel and handling of a camera can make or break your experience, especially in the field or during long shoots.
Both the D3500 and D5500 come in the classic compact DSLR form factor, but the D3500 is noticeably lighter at 365g (body only) compared to the D5500’s 420g. That may not sound like much, but over a day of shooting or travel, those extra grams add up.
The D3500 feels a bit smaller and more streamlined, reflecting its focus on beginner-friendly usability and portability. For travel or street shooters who prize discreteness and minimal bulk, the D3500’s slightly smaller chassis could be a plus.
The D5500 offers a deeper grip and a more substantial feel, even if the dimensions are roughly identical (both 124 x 97 x 70 mm). Those extra clubs for your thumbs and fingers enhance stability, making it a little better suited for heavier lenses or prolonged shooting sessions.
Control-wise, the D5500 benefits from a more extensive button layout and a dedicated AF mode dial, which I find helpful when switching between focus modes quickly. The D3500 keeps it simpler, trading some direct controls for ease-of-use, which could be advantageous for new users overwhelmed by too many buttons.
Sensor and Image Quality: Same Resolution, Slight Differences in Performance
At their core, both cameras use very similar APS-C CMOS sensors sized 23.5x15.6mm, boasting 24-megapixel resolution. Both lack an optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter, which helps maximize sharpness.
One might expect similar image quality - and you'd be mostly right - but according to DxOMark data, the D5500 holds a modest edge with an overall score of 84, while the D3500 hasn't been officially tested. Nikon’s sensor tech consistency across these models means images will be sharp, detailed, and vibrant on both.
However, the D5500’s sensor and image processor combination deliver a slightly better dynamic range (~14 EV vs. D3500’s unknown but generally good) and higher low-light ISO performance (DxO low-light ISO rating 1438). Practically speaking, that means you get cleaner files with less noise when shooting at ISO 1600 or above, which is great for night scenes, indoor events, and challenging light.
Both cameras max out at ISO 25600, but I’d recommend keeping ISO below 3200 on the D3500 for acceptable noise levels, whereas the D5500 can push a little higher before unwanted grain creeps in.
Color depth and white balance consistency are both strong with these two, though the D5500’s option for bracketing white balance and advanced metering modes gives you more control under mixed lighting.
User Interface and Screens: Fixed vs. Fully Articulated Touchscreen
A big lifestyle difference comes with the tilting versus fixed LCD.
The Nikon D5500 sports a 3.2-inch, fully articulating touchscreen LCD with 1037k dots resolution - a joy for composing at awkward angles, vlogging, or selfies. The touchscreen responsiveness is excellent, allowing intuitive tap-to-focus and quick menu navigation. It also supports a selfie-friendly flip mode.
By contrast, the D3500 has a simpler 3.0-inch fixed TFT LCD with only 921k dots and no touchscreen functionality. It’s crisp enough for framing and reviewing but feels a bit outdated by 2024 standards.
If you’re someone who values composing live view shots from weird angles (macro or video work), or you crave touch convenience, the D5500 takes the win here.
Autofocus Systems: More Focus Points, Better Tracking on the D5500
Autofocus can be a critical feature depending on your shooting discipline. I tested both cameras extensively using fast moving subjects and various AF modes.
The D3500 features 11 focus points with phase-detection autofocus, all cross-type unknown, maintaining decent basic tracking and accuracy.
The D5500 boosts that to 39 focus points, including 9 cross-type points, resulting in noticeably faster and more reliable autofocus lock-on and tracking in challenging scenarios like sports or wildlife.
Both cameras support face detection in live view, but neither offers animal eye AF, a feature reserved for Nikon’s higher-end cameras.
For portrait photographers relying on eye detection and for action shooters chasing erratic subjects, the D5500’s improved AF array will be a game-changer.
Burst Rates and Shutter Performance: Matching in Speed, Slightly Different in Experience
Both cameras deliver similar continuous shooting speeds of 5 frames per second. Neither is blazing fast compared to high-end DSLRs but fine for capturing most everyday moments including casual sports or wildlife.
One difference is the D5500 offers quieter shutter operation and a gentler mirror slap, which helps reduce camera shake during continuous shooting, improving sharpness in delicate macro or telephoto work.
The D3500 has a solid shutter durability rating, matching that of many entry-level DSLRs, but with a slightly crisper sound that some may find distracting in quiet environments like nature reserves or concerts.
Flash Systems and ISO Performance: What’s Under the Hood?
Both cameras sport a built-in pop-up flash.
- The D5500 features a substantially longer flash range at 12 meters (ISO 100) versus 7 meters on the D3500.
- The D5500 supports advanced flash modes including red-eye reduction variants and slow sync, as well as external flash compatibility with Nikon’s wireless system.
- The D3500 also offers a wide range of flash modes but lacks auto slow sync with red-eye reduction options found on the D5500.
When paired with a compatible external flash, both perform well in fill-flash situations, but built-in flash usability favors the D5500 for environments where flash distance matters.
Video Capabilities: Solid 1080p, But Different Connectivity
For casual videographers and content creators, both cameras shoot full HD 1080p at 60fps, with multiple frame rates down to 24fps.
However, neither camera offers 4K video, which is an expected compromise at their price points.
The D5500 comes with a microphone input jack, enabling better audio capture with external mics - a big plus for YouTubers or vloggers wanting quality sound. The D3500 lacks this, restricting you to the onboard mic.
Neither offers headphone monitoring, so audio tweaking is a bit restricted across the board.
Video autofocus uses contrast detection on both models, which means relatively slow and occasionally hunting AF during video recording.
Battery Life and Storage: Marathons vs Sprint Shoots
Here’s where the D3500 really shines: Nikon rates the D3500’s battery for a whopping 1550 shots per charge, nearly double the D5500’s 820 shots.
The D3500 uses the EN-EL14a battery, while the D5500 is compatible with EN-EL14 and EN-EL14a, so no difference in battery pack size, but distinct firmware optimization and internal power management.
For travel photographers, long hikes, or event shooters reliant on extended shooting without recharge, the D3500 offers unparalleled endurance.
Both cameras support a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. No dual slots here, but common in budget DSLRs.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Neither Built to Endure the Elements
Neither model offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. This isn’t surprising in entry-level Nikon DSLRs.
Build quality on both feels solid for the category, with polycarbonate bodies and metal lens mounts, but heavy rain or dusty environments require caution.
For serious nature photographers, consider aftermarket rain covers or weather-sealed lenses as supplemental protection.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras share the Nikon F-mount and crop factor of 1.5x, meaning any Nikon DX lens or FX lens can be mounted.
Nikon offers a vast ecosystem of over 300 lenses compatible with these bodies, including favorites from the affordable AF-P DX series to pro-grade F-mount glass.
The D5500’s compatibility with newer AF-P lenses means it can benefit from faster, quieter autofocus motors present in current Nikon lenses, while the D3500 supports them too, being updated firmware-wise.
Connectivity: Wireless and File Transfer
The D3500 includes Bluetooth only, with no built-in Wi-Fi, which Nikon implements mainly through the SnapBridge app for auto photo transfer to mobile devices.
The D5500 offers built-in Wi-Fi and optional GPS connectivity via an accessory, enabling more direct sharing and geotagging.
The D3500’s simpler wireless approach appeals to budget-conscious users happy with basic smartphone backups, while the D5500 edges ahead for workflow-conscious users wanting faster image sharing in the field.
Photography Genres: Performance in Real-World Conditions
Let’s evaluate both cameras by photography style to see which aligns best with your needs.
Portrait Photography
- D5500: More AF points (39 vs 11), touchscreen for focusing, fully articulating display for tricky angles, and better dynamic range make it the portrait winner. Color rendition is vibrant and pleasing; facial detection works well.
- D3500: Solid performer, though fewer AF points slow your ability to nail eye focus fast, and fixed screen limits creative composition.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras shine with 24MP sensors and clean files at low ISO. However, the D5500 brings better dynamic range and white balance bracketing, offering expanded flexibility in challenging light.
- The D3500’s longer battery life is a boon on remote hikes, but the lack of articulating screen may be hinderance for low or high angle shots.
Wildlife Photography
- The D5500’s superior autofocus system and more focus points give it a clear edge, as does quieter shutter for less startling animals.
- Both have a 5fps burst rate - not blazing, but usable for moderate action.
- The D3500’s weight advantage helps in long stalking sessions.
Sports Photography
- Both struggle to keep pace with professional flagship sports bodies but manage casual to intermediate-level action.
- The D5500’s improved AF tracking and additional focus points help maintain focus on fast-moving players better.
Street Photography
- The D3500’s smaller, lighter body supports discreet shooting.
- Lack of articulating touchscreen might hinder more spontaneous live-view framing compared to the D5500.
- Both have quietish shutters and acceptable AF, but D3500 is more convenient for quick snaps or travel.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera has special macro features, but articulated screen on the D5500 is invaluable for shooting at strange angles.
- Both can pair with macro lenses easily.
Night and Astro Photography
- While neither is a low-light king, D5500’s better noise handling at higher ISOs (up to about 3200 usable vs 1600 on D3500) helps.
- Longer battery life of D3500 helps for extended timelapse sessions, but D5500 supports time-lapse video recording natively.
Video Work
- The D5500 offers a microphone jack and articulating touchscreen, making it a modestly better video rig.
- Both max out at 1080p 60fps.
Travel Photography
- D3500’s light weight and superior battery life make it ideal for travelers weighing every gram, though limited wireless features slow image sharing.
- D5500’s touchscreen, Wi-Fi, and Wi-Fi image sharing appeal more to bloggers and social media-savvy travelers.
Professional Workflows
- Neither camera is designed for heavy professional shooting, but the D5500’s larger AF system, robust exposure metering, and improved bracketing options offer more creative flexibility.
- Both support RAW files, but D5500 images have slightly better latitude.
Price-to-Performance and Who Should Buy Which?
Let’s talk numbers and value because after all, your wallet counts.
Camera | Launch Price (USD) | Current Approx. Price | Strengths |
---|---|---|---|
D3500 | $396.95 | ~$400 | Best battery life, light, beginner-friendly, affordable |
D5500 | $699.95 | ~$600-$700 | Better AF, articulating touchscreen, mic input, better image quality |
If you are a total beginner or a budget-conscious enthusiast looking for durable, no-fuss simplicity and marathon battery life, the Nikon D3500 offers incredible bang for buck. It pairs nicely with a kit lens for family photos, travel snapshots, and casual landscapes.
On the other hand, if you want more sophisticated autofocus for portraits, sports, and wildlife, as well as touchscreen convenience and mild video capability, and can stretch your budget a bit, the Nikon D5500 is the better investment. Its flexibility and control will grow with your skills.
Technical Snapshot: A Quick Comparison Table
Feature | Nikon D3500 | Nikon D5500 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 24MP APS-C CMOS | 24MP APS-C CMOS |
Processor | Expeed 4 | Expeed 4 |
Autofocus Points | 11 | 39 |
Max ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | 5 fps |
Screen | 3.0" Fixed TFT LCD | 3.2" Fully Articulated Touchscreen LCD |
Viewfinder Coverage | 95% Pentamirror | 95% Pentamirror |
Built-in Flash Range | 7m | 12m |
Video | 1080p @ 60fps | 1080p @ 60fps, mic input |
Wireless | Bluetooth only | Wi-Fi built-in |
Battery Life | 1550 shots | 820 shots |
Weight (body only) | 365g | 420g |
Storage | Single SD card | Single SD card |
Weather Sealing | No | No |
Final Verdict: The Old-But-Gold Classic vs The More Mature Sibling
Both the Nikon D3500 and D5500 remain highly capable cameras in 2024 even as mirrorless dominates the market. The question boils down to your priorities:
- Are you aiming for the best value, extended battery life, and simplicity? The D3500 is a champion for beginners and casual shooters.
- Do you want a more advanced camera with improved autofocus, better image quality in challenging light, and touchscreen versatility? The D5500 fits that bill.
Neither is perfect - lack of 4K video, no weather sealing, and dated connectivity are compromises - but both excel in their niche. As someone who has tested both body and lens combos extensively, I recommend the D3500 if your budget is tight and ease-of-use paramount, while the D5500 is worth the extra cash for those ready to step up creatively.
About the Author
With 15+ years reviewing cameras and shooting everything from wildlife to weddings, I know that gear is just a tool - but the right one can unlock your photographic potential. Hopefully, my insights help you make a confident choice today.
Happy shooting!
Summary of Pros and Cons
Camera | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
D3500 | Lightweight, killer battery life, simple interface, sharp images | Fewer AF points, no touchscreen, limited video/audio |
D5500 | More AF points, articulating touchscreen, mic input, better low light | Heavier, shorter battery life, pricier |
Thank you for reading this in-depth Nikon D3500 vs D5500 comparison. Should you want sample shots or performance data, check below:
Explore your photographic journey armed with the right gear - and remember, the best camera is the one in your hands!
Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5500 Specifications
Nikon D3500 | Nikon D5500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon D3500 | Nikon D5500 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2018-08-29 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 4 | Expeed 4 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 39 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
Available lenses | 309 | 309 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 365 grams (0.80 lb) | 420 grams (0.93 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") | 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1438 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1550 shots | 820 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL14a | EN-EL14,EN-EL14a |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $397 | $700 |