Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520
71 Imaging
66 Features
85 Overall
73
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 420g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Older Model is Nikon D5300
- Renewed by Nikon D5600
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the D5500 (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the D5500 (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe D5500 was unveiled 6 years after the E-520 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the D5500 grades versus the E-520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon D5500 and Olympus E-520. The full galleries are available at Nikon D5500 Gallery and Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D5500 over the Olympus E-520
| D5500 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 |  | August 2008 | Newer by 78 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon D5500
| E-520 | D5500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D5500 and Olympus E-520
| D5500 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Nikon D5500 has exterior dimensions of 124mm x 97mm x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has specifications of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Examine the Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the D5500 compared to the E-520.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D5500 and E-520 is 71 and 68 respectively.
Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the D5500 and E-520.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The D5500 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon D5500 will offer you extra detail having an extra 14MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent D5500 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon D5500 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Nikon D5500 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon D5500 | Olympus E-520 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-01-06 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 39 | 3 |
| Cross type focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 309 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 420 grams (0.93 pounds) | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 84 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.1 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.0 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1438 | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 820 pictures | 650 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL14,EN-EL14a | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $700 | $400 |