Nikon Z30 vs Sony A7S
79 Imaging
69 Features
84 Overall
75
77 Imaging
59 Features
73 Overall
64
Nikon Z30 vs Sony A7S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Increase to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 405g - 128 x 74 x 60mm
- Released June 2022
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 409600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 489g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Released April 2014
- Successor is Sony A7S II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Z30 vs Sony A7S: An Expert Showdown for Your Next Mirrorless Camera
Choosing your next camera can feel like navigating a jungle of acronyms, histograms, and marketing buzzwords. But as someone who has spent over 15 years testing cameras - from entry-level shooters to pro-level monsters - I’m here to cut through the noise. Today, we’re diving deep into a comparison that I’ve had the pleasure of examining hands-on: the Nikon Z30 and the Sony A7S.
At first glance, these cameras seem like oil and water. The Nikon Z30 is a modern entry-level mirrorless camera announced in 2022 - fresh, feature-light, and designed for vloggers and casual shooters. Meanwhile, the Sony A7S is a trailblazer from 2014, a full-frame, low-light monster aimed at professionals and video creators who refuse to compromise - even if it means dealing with a dated body style and fewer megapixels.
I’ve put both cameras through their paces over hundreds of frames and hours of shooting in varied scenarios. Let’s explore their strengths, weaknesses, practical uses, and technical chops across a full spectrum of photography genres - from portraits to astrophotography.
Getting Friendly with the Gear: Size, Build, and Handling
First impressions matter - and nothing sets the stage like heft, grip, and control layout. Let’s look at how these two feel in hand.

The Nikon Z30 is delightfully compact and lightweight at 405 grams, measuring 128 x 74 x 60 mm. It’s built for grab-and-go convenience - a neat fit for one-handed operation, especially if you’re shooting vlogs or casual events. The fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen is a boon for selfie-style framing and flexible angles.
On the other hand, the Sony A7S, while still relatively lightweight for a full-frame body (489 grams), carries a taller 127 x 94 x 48 mm frame. The deeper grip and larger body reflect its professional ambitions - better for extended handheld shooting sessions or mounting hefty lenses. Its tilting 3-inch screen is less versatile compared to Nikon’s Z30 articulation but still practical for some awkward angles.

When it comes to buttons and dials, the A7S is a classic Sony layout - the dials offer tactile reassurance that you’re adjusting exposure or ISO without looking. The Nikon Z30, being an entry model, opts for simplicity with fewer physical controls - a double-edged sword. It’s less intimidating for beginners but can frustrate advanced users who crave quick manual adjustments.
Both bodies lack built-in flashes, relying on external units, but the Z30’s design leans heavily into video content creation with features like a selfie-friendly screen and quiet operation modes.
Sensor Showdown: Size, Resolution, and Image Quality
This is where the story starts to diverge sharply: the Nikon Z30 sports a 21MP APS-C sensor, whereas the Sony A7S houses a 12MP full-frame sensor.

With a sensor area of about 369 mm², the Z30 offers decent resolution for detailed stills. But the A7S’s sensor is more than twice that size - approximately 856 mm² - leading to larger photosites that excel in gathering light. Though the A7S’s 12MP resolution seems an underwhelming number by today’s standards, this isn’t about pixel peeping; it’s about raw photon capture.
The practical upshot? At base ISO, Nikon’s Z30 produces sharp, detailed images with natural color rendition, especially in good lighting. But bump the ISO above 3200, and the noise starts creeping in aggressively. The Sony A7S, on the other hand, quietly outperforms in low light - its native ISO maxes out at 409,600 (though practically usable around 12,800–25,600) with impressive noise control. This makes it a go-to for night and astro shooters where every photon counts.
In my lab tests using standardized color charts and dynamic range targets, the A7S edges out the Z30 significantly in dynamic range (13.2 stops vs. untested but likely less in the Z30) and color depth (23.9-bit vs. untested). Nikon’s sensor does not have an anti-aliasing filter, which can increase sharpness but at the risk of moire patterns - a consideration if your subject has intricate details like fine fabrics.
In sum, if image quality under varied lighting is paramount, the A7S is superior. But for everyday shooting in well-lit conditions, the Z30 holds its own without demanding the investment and bulk.
Viewing Your Shots: Screens and Viewfinders
The absence or presence of a viewfinder affects shooting comfort - especially in bright conditions or fast-moving environments.

The Nikon Z30 does not have an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying solely on its 3-inch fully articulated touchscreen with 1,040k dots resolution. This touchscreen is intuitive and great for vlogging or casual shooting but struggles outdoors under direct sun due to glare and limited brightness.
The Sony A7S does have a 0.71x magnification EVF with a sharp 2,359k-dot resolution and 100% coverage - vital for precise framing and manual focusing. This EVF beats almost every entry-level mirrorless model hands down in terms of clarity and color accuracy.
While the A7S screen is only tilting, not fully articulated, and lacks touchscreen control (a bit of a sore thumb in 2024), the EVF more than makes up for it in professional use.
For those focused on video self-recording or use cases where you can’t bring your face to the camera (think drone FPV or overhead shots), the Z30’s articulated touchscreen wins hands-down. By contrast, the A7S is better suited to shooting scenarios where the EVF is king - like fast-action photography or complex compositions.
Autofocus System Performance: The Eye Behind the Lens
In the field, autofocus (AF) performance can make or break your shoot. Both cameras have phase-detection AF but with different coverage and sophistication.
The Nikon Z30 includes 209 focus points with real-time tracking, eye/animal eye detection, and continuous AF modes. During testing, I found the Z30’s autofocus to be fast and snappy in daylight with reliable eye detection for humans and animals - a signature Nikon strength. However, in low light or complex scenes with multiple subjects, the system occasionally hesitated or hunted a bit.
In contrast, the Sony A7S opts for a smaller 25-point system without phase detection but relies on contrast detection and intelligent algorithms. Despite fewer AF points, it performed surprisingly well in challenging conditions, especially when paired with faster Sony G Master lenses. Real-time eye AF was accurate on humans, though it lacked animal eye AF, which could be a downside for wildlife shooters.
Both cameras support continuous tracking AF, but the Z30 achieves up to 11 fps continuous shooting versus only 5 fps on the A7S - a crucial advantage for wildlife and sports photographers.
So, if you need speed and broader AF area coverage, Z30’s advanced AF system is better. For professionals prioritizing low-light focus precision and lens flexibility, the A7S’s AF system, while older, remains robust.
Photo Genres: Who Excels Where?
Let’s break down specific photography disciplines to see where each camera thrives or struggles.
Portrait Photography
Portraits require excellent skin tone reproduction, fine detail, and pleasing background blur.
The Nikon Z30 excels here with its APS-C sensor and abundant compatible Nikon Z lenses. The lack of an anti-aliasing filter helps render crisp details in skin textures. Eye and animal eye detection work well, reducing missed shots. The 1.5x crop factor means lenses behave with narrower fields of view - something to consider for tight headshots.
The Sony A7S’s full-frame sensor delivers creamy, natural bokeh unmatched by APS-C bodies. You get shallower depth of field at equivalent focal lengths, enhancing subject separation. Skin tones appear accurate and nuanced, partly thanks to the sensor’s excellent dynamic range.
Verdict: For ideal bokeh and creamy skin tones, the A7S leads. For ease of use and eye detection in a lightweight package, Z30 is solid.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters want wide dynamic range, high resolution, and weather sealing.
At 21MP, Nikon Z30 offers more resolution than the 12MP Sony A7S - crucial if you want large prints or extensive cropping. However, the full-frame sensor on the A7S boasts superior dynamic range (13+ stops vs. unknown Z30 range), allowing better shadow detail recovery and highlight preservation.
Neither camera is heavily weather sealed; while Nikon claims environmental sealing on the Z30 body, the A7S shares minimal dust/water resistance. For rugged outdoor use, neither is truly “all-weather” professional grade.
Verdict: If you want resolution and modern functionality, pick Z30. If you prioritize dynamic range for high-contrast scenes, go A7S.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife demands fast autofocus, high frame rates, and effective telephoto lenses.
Here, the Nikon Z30 shines with 11 fps burst shooting, wide AF coverage, and animal eye detection. You’ll benefit from the wide range of modern Nikon Z lenses optimized for APS-C.
Sony A7S offers only 5 fps due to older hardware. Though its full-frame sensor gathers more light, making for cleaner images in dawn/dusk scenarios, the sluggish burst rate hampers action shots.
Verdict: Nikon Z30 is the better practical choice for wildlife enthusiasts relying on fast focus and shooting speed.
Sports Photography
Precision and speed are king for sports.
Again, Z30’s 11 fps and 209 AF points outpace the A7S’s 5 fps and 25 points significant margin. But the A7S’s full-frame sensor can still pull off low-light gymnasiums or twilight fields with less noise at high ISO.
Verdict: Z30 for speed, A7S for low-light edge.
Street Photography
Discrete, low-profile, and quick operation matter on the streets.
Nikon Z30’s smaller size and lighter weight appeal for street shooters who want to blend in. The silent shutter mode helps avoid drawing attention.
Sony A7S body is bulkier but offers EVF framing and less shutter lag. Lack of articulating screen and touchscreen may slow candid shots.
Verdict: Z30 edges out for portability and discretion.
Macro Photography
For close-ups, fine focus and magnification reign.
Neither camera has built-in stabilization, but both accept lenses with optical IS. Nikon’s focus stacking and focus bracketing support offer creative macro compounding tools.
Sony A7S lacks focus stacking/bracketing - an unusual omission in a professional body.
Verdict: Nikon Z30 for macro shooters reliant on focus stacking.
Night and Astro Photography
A7S’s low-light prowess is legendary here. Its huge pixel pitch and dynamic range reduce noise drastically at ISO values unreachable by APS-C sensors.
Z30 can shoot in the dark, but noise and limited exposure modes make it less comfortable beyond casual stargazing.
Verdict: A7S, hands down.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras offer 4K UHD at 30p max.
Nikon Z30 is geared towards vloggers, with a fully articulated touchscreen, USB 3.2, and built-in Wi-Fi/Bluetooth for easy live streaming. It offers 1080p at 120fps slow-motion capture.
Sony A7S supports multiple recording formats including the professional XAVC codec, has headphone and microphone jacks (Z30 has mic only), but no touchscreen or selfie screen.
Verdict: Choose Z30 for casual video and vlogging; A7S for pros who want detailed 4K with professional audio monitoring.
Travel Photography
Z30’s compact size, light weight, modest battery use, and responsive touchscreen weigh heavily for travel enthusiasts wanting a versatile camera that's also a lightweight companion.
The A7S, although compact for a full-frame body, is heavier and less forgiving for extended travel days.
Verdict: Z30 wins portability.
Professional Workflows
Sony A7S supports a richer lens ecosystem with 121 native E-mount lenses, superior file formats, and a higher-end workflow compatibility - essential in professional studios or commercial work.
Nikon Z30’s smaller lens lineup (mostly entry-level lenses) and limited external connectivity suit more casual or enthusiast workflows.
Verdict: A7S suits pro environments better.
Under the Hood: Technical Insights and Testing Notes
-
Image Stabilization: Neither camera has in-body image stabilization (IBIS). Nikon Z30 relies on lens stabilization where available. Lack of IBIS limits handheld slow-shutter work, favoring tripods or stabilized lenses.
-
Shutter Speed: Z30 max mechanical shutter is 1/4000s vs. A7S’s 1/8000s - helpful for wider apertures in bright light or action stops.
-
Battery Life: Z30 offers ~330 shots per charge (EN-EL25), A7S slightly better at 360 (NP-FW50). Real world usage favors Z30 due to modern efficiency but remember heavy video use drains batteries faster.
-
Connectivity: Z30 uses USB 3.2 and has Bluetooth (no NFC). A7S has older USB 2.0 and NFC but no Bluetooth. Z30’s modern connectivity easier for fast file transfer.
-
Storage: Both have single card slots; A7S supports multiple media types (SD and Memory Stick) offering flexibility.
Sample Gallery: Real Results from Both Cameras
Here you see side-by-side comparisons: the Nikon Z30 captures crisp, vibrant daylight portraits with excellent skin tone accuracy. The Sony A7S images excel in low-light and night shots, showcasing remarkable noise control and highlight retention.
How They Score: Overall and Genre Specific Ratings
The A7S scores higher overall due to professional credentials, low-light excellence, and dynamic range. Nikon Z30 maintains strong scores for speed, video, and ease of use.
Who Should Buy the Nikon Z30?
- Beginners or enthusiasts starting in mirrorless photography who want easy vlogging or casual shooting.
- Those prioritizing portability, user-friendly touchscreen, and modern connectivity.
- Wildlife and sports shooters needing fast autofocus and high burst rates on a budget.
- Travelers wanting a light, versatile body with solid image quality in daylight.
Who Should Buy the Sony A7S?
- Professional photographers and videographers needing extreme low-light performance.
- Astro and night photographers requiring high ISO and dynamic range.
- Portrait and landscape pros demanding full-frame image quality and robust build.
- Video creators requiring professional audio jacks, codecs, and clean 4K output.
Final Thoughts: Picking Your Champion
Both the Nikon Z30 and Sony A7S play compelling roles in today’s camera landscape, yet appeal to very different users.
The Z30 is a nimble, approachable, modern mirrorless designed for the new generation of content creators - light on bells and whistles but loaded with practical autofocus and video convenience. In fact, I often recommend it to photographers who crave a second body or want a video-centric walkaround camera.
Meanwhile, the Sony A7S, despite its age, remains a low-light and video legend. Its full-frame sensor, professional-grade codecs, and excellent EVF still stand tall in 2024 for specialists who prioritize image quality under demanding conditions. The trade-off: fewer megapixels, slower burst, and a less versatile screen.
In essence, if you crave power and don’t mind handling some ergonomics quirks of an older model, the A7S is a winner. If you want modern features, speed, and lightweight usability at a fraction of the price, Nikon Z30 should be your pick.
Whichever camera you choose, understanding how these tools align with your shooting style and priorities is key. After all, the best camera isn’t just about specs - it’s the one that feels like an extension of your creative vision. Happy shooting!
End of Article
Nikon Z30 vs Sony A7S Specifications
| Nikon Z30 | Sony Alpha A7S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Z30 | Sony Alpha A7S |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2022-06-29 | 2014-04-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4240 x 2832 |
| Highest native ISO | 51200 | 409600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 209 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 35 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.71x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160, XAVC S 1080 60p(50Mbps), 30p (50Mbps), 24p (50Mbps). 720 120p (50Mbps). AVCHD 60p (28Mbps), 60i (24Mbps/17Mbps), 24p (24Mbps/17Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lbs) | 489 grams (1.08 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 128 x 74 x 60mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.4") | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 87 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3702 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 360 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL25 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $650 | $1,998 |