Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6700: An Experienced Photographer’s In-Depth Comparison

Choosing your next mirrorless camera, especially in the mid-to-advanced segment, can feel like navigating a technological maze - flashes of specs, promises of performance, and marketing hyperbole at every turn. Having spent over 15 years putting cameras through their paces - from hiking rugged mountain trails to intense studio shoots - I’m here to break down the Nikon Z5 and Sony A6700. My goal? To offer you a genuinely useful, no-nonsense comparison rooted in real-world experience, solid technical knowledge, and a dash of candid perspective.

Both the Nikon Z5 and Sony A6700 retail around the same price point (~$1,399), but cater to different photographers thanks to their unique sensor sizes, body types, and feature sets. Let’s start with a broad overview before diving into the nitty-gritty details that really separate these two.

Getting Acquainted: The Cameras at a Glance

Before we get technical, it’s important to understand each camera’s design philosophy and market positioning.

• Nikon Z5: Nikon’s entry-level full-frame mirrorless offering, launched in mid-2020, aims to deliver pristine image quality and robust build at a relatively accessible price. Sporting a classic SLR-style body, a 24MP sensor, and in-body 5-axis stabilization, it seeks to serve enthusiasts stepping into full-frame territory.

• Sony A6700: Released in 2023, this advanced APS-C mirrorless camera continues Sony’s line of highly capable, compact rangefinder-style bodies. Packed with a 26MP sensor, a blisteringly fast 11 FPS burst rate, and advanced video specs (including 4K at 120fps), it appeals to hybrid shooters who want speed, agile handling, and solid video in a portable package.

Here’s an immediate physical and ergonomic comparison to get an intuitive feel for their difference in size and shape:

At 134x101x70mm and 675g, the Nikon Z5 unmistakably feels more substantial - solid grip, balanced heft, and a body that inspires confidence. The Sony A6700, meanwhile, is smaller and lighter (122x69x75mm, 493g), which you’ll appreciate for street, travel, and scenarios requiring mobility.

Design and Controls: Where Form Meets Function

Both cameras sport electronic viewfinders (EVF), articulated touchscreens, and robust weather sealing - but details matter.

In my hands, Nikon’s SLR-style layout feels familiar and intuitive, especially for photographers coming from DSLRs. Its 3.2-inch tilting screen provides flexibility but not full articulation, which can be a downside for vloggers or creative angles. The Z5’s 3,690k-dot EVF offers sharp clarity and a comfortable 0.8x magnification.

The Sony A6700 embraces a rangefinder style, with a fully articulating 3.0-inch screen great for selfies and multi-angle shooting. Its 2,359k-dot viewfinder doesn’t quite match Nikon’s resolution but remains crisp at 0.71x magnification. Button placement and customizable dials are well thought out, allowing rapid adjustments while on the move. The Sony’s touch responsiveness is snappier, a subtle but noticeable advantage in fast-paced shooting conditions.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Full-Frame vs APS-C

This is where the big debate begins - and I won’t sugarcoat it: Sensor size and architecture profoundly impact image quality, dynamic range, low-light performance, and the overall creative palette.

Nikon Z5 – Full Frame CMOS, 24.3 Megapixels

The Z5 sports a 35.9×23.9 mm full-frame sensor, which is significantly larger than Sony’s APS-C sensor (23.5×15.6 mm). The advantage: Greater light-gathering capability, shallower depth of field potential, and marginally superior dynamic range. Combined with Nikon’s Expeed 6 processor, the camera delivers rich, natural colors and excellent RAW files that stand up well in post-processing.

In my experience, the Z5 excels in skin tones - capturing nuanced textures and pleasing warmth without heavy-handed in-camera processing. The camera’s anti-aliasing filter, while slightly softening some fine detail, helps prevent moiré, a traditional challenge in real-world shooting.

Sony A6700 – APS-C BSI CMOS, 26 Megapixels

Sony’s 26MP back-illuminated sensor is a marvel of compact design and efficiency, with impressive resolution packed into a smaller frame. The A6700’s BSI architecture boosts sensitivity and readout speeds. On my test shoots, images show punchy colors and sharp, detailed textures - though obviously the depth-of-field control and low-light latitude can’t quite match a full-frame sensor.

Sony’s sensor size multiplier (1.5x) also means lenses provide a narrower field of view compared to full-frame, which some photographers might find limiting or creatively advantageous depending on their style.

Autofocus System: Precision vs Speed

Focusing technology can make or break a shoot. Both the Nikon Z5 and Sony A6700 sport hybrid AF systems with eye detection and animal eye AF, but their implementations differ.

• Nikon Z5: 273 focus points, utilizing phase-detection and contrast-detection AF for a balanced, reliable system especially suited to portraits and landscapes. AF is accurate, with solid eye and animal detection; however, continuous AF and tracking top out at 4.5 fps burst, which limits its sports and wildlife photography appeal.

• Sony A6700: 759 focus points, all phase-detection, paired with superior AF algorithms deliver blazingly fast and accurate subject tracking. The 11 fps burst shooting is a joy in wild or sporting conditions, and eye/animal AF performs exceptionally even in challenging lighting.

In sum, the A6700’s autofocus system is more versatile and dynamic for action and unpredictable scenes, while the Z5’s AF focuses on precision and consistency for more deliberate shooting.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Ergonomics

Durability matters when you’re hauling gear in rain, dust, or extreme temperatures.

• The Nikon Z5 boasts environmental sealing that is well-executed. While not advertised as fully waterproof or shockproof, it should withstand most outdoor conditions encountered by serious photographers.

• Sony A6700 also features weather sealing, designed to handle moisture and dust confidently. Its lighter body may feel less robust but balances ruggedness with portability.

Ergonomically, I prefer Nikon’s deeper grip and traditional SLR feel for longer handheld sessions, particularly when using heavier lenses, whereas Sony’s compact shape suits urban and travel photographers who prioritize discretion and speed.

Viewfinder and LCD Display: Your Window to Creativity

Seeing your shot clearly - especially in changing light - is essential.

Both cameras feature ~1040k-dot touchscreens, but the difference in articulation (tilting vs fully articulating) impacts shooting flexibility. For video bloggers or creative low/high-angle shooters, Sony’s fully articulating screen is preferable. Nikon’s tilting screen is still versatile but less so for selfie workflows.

Nikon’s EVF wins in resolution and magnification, delivering a more immersive composing experience. Sony’s EVF, while excellent, feels a touch smaller and less bright in direct sunlight, verified by my outdoor tests.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Your camera’s potential is intrinsically linked to its lens pool.

• Nikon Z Mount: Relatively young but growing steadily. The Nikon Z5 supports approximately 15 native Z lenses (as of 2024), with excellent full-frame options available from wide-angle to telephoto. Nikon also scores highly with the FTZ adapter, allowing use of legacy F-mount DSLR lenses at native full-frame coverage, a boon for photographers transitioning from DSLRs.

• Sony E Mount: A mature and diverse system boasting nearly 200 native APS-C and full-frame lenses. Sony’s third-party support rivals Nikon’s, with options from ultra-fast primes to super-zooms. The APS-C sensor limitation means full-frame lenses behave with a 1.5x crop factor, but you gain access to incredible optics across budgets.

If lens variety and specialized glass are a decisive factor, Sony’s ecosystem currently holds a wealth of options, but Nikon’s lenses are catching up rapidly.

Burst Shooting, Buffer, and Sports Performance

If you shoot action or wildlife, performance under rapid-fire conditions is critical.

• Nikon Z5: 4.5 fps continuous - solid for casual sports or family snaps but will struggle with fast-moving subjects. Buffer depth can hold around 30 RAW files before slowing.

• Sony A6700: 11 fps continuous with a generous buffer, making it ideal for sports, wildlife, and fast-moving street photography. The silent electronic shutter mode at 8 fps is handy in quiet environments.

For fast-paced genres, the Sony is the clear winner here.

Video Capabilities: Hybrid Shooters Rejoice or Look Away

Video specs often sway buyers, so here’s the scoop.

• Sony A6700: Supports 4K UHD recording up to 120p at 280 Mbps H.265, enabling stunning slow-motion footage. It offers advanced video codecs (XAVC HS, MP4), headphone and microphone jacks, and comprehensive in-body 5-axis stabilization. The fully articulating touchscreen further benefits videographers.

• Nikon Z5: Offers 4K UHD at up to 30p, 1080p up to 60p, with H.264 encoding. It too includes headphone and mic ports and sensor-based 5-axis stabilization. However, there’s no 4K120p slow-motion option - which might disappoint pro videographers.

Sony’s more advanced codec and frame rate options make the A6700 a better all-around hybrid shooter.

Battery Life and Storage: Keeping the Power Running

Shooting all day demands reliable battery endurance and flexible storage.

• Nikon Z5: Uses the EN-EL15c battery, rated roughly 470 shots per charge. Dual UHS-II SD card slots provide instant backup or overflow - an important feature valued by professionals.

• Sony A6700: Uses the NP-FZ1000 battery that lasts around 570 shots per charge and supports a single SD card slot (UHS-I compatible) plus a Memory Stick Duo (which is increasingly niche but backward compatible).

From a practical perspective, dual slots offer peace-of-mind for critical work; in everyday shooting, Sony's single slot usually suffices.

Final Verdict: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Which Camera Wins Your Heart?

Portrait Photographers

• Nikon Z5: The full-frame sensor and excellent eye/animal AF combine for superior skin tones, creamy bokeh, and precise focus - ideal for dreamy portraits.
• Sony A6700: More compact and faster AF, but APS-C depth of field doesn’t quite match full-frame’s rendering.

Winner: Nikon Z5

Landscape Photographers

• Nikon Z5: Full-frame sensor, superior dynamic range, and weather sealing make it the go-to for detailed landscapes.
• Sony A6700: Sharp APS-C resolution and sturdy design, but smaller sensor limits shadow recovery.

Winner: Nikon Z5

Wildlife and Sports Photographers

• Nikon Z5: Limited burst speed and fewer focus points hinder fast action shooting.
• Sony A6700: High burst, whisper-quiet shutter, and a massive number of focus points make it a champ.

Winner: Sony A6700

Street and Travel Photographers

• Nikon Z5: Bulkier, better in stable conditions.
• Sony A6700: Lightweight, discreet, and versatile - perfect pocket companion.

Winner: Sony A6700

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

Both cameras offer sensor-based stabilization helping long exposures and macro precision. Nikon’s full-frame sensor gives it the edge in subtle tonal gradation for astro, but Sony’s higher burst speeds and crisp imaging assist in creative macro shots.

Video Shooters and Hybrid Users

Sony’s advanced video specifications, higher frame rates, and articulating screen make it the clear video-friendly machine.

Putting It All Together: The Practical Choice

The Nikon Z5 is a fantastic, approachable full-frame camera with excellent image quality, favored by photographers who prize traditional ergonomics, portraits, and landscapes. It’s a dependable companion for those wanting to step up from APS-C bodies without breaking the bank.

Conversely, the Sony A6700 shines with speed, versatility, and video prowess - ideal for content creators, street and wildlife photographers who want a nimble system with vast lens options and stellar autofocus.

Both models retail around $1,399, meaning your decision boils down to sensor size preference and shooting style rather than price alone.

Sample Images from Both Cameras

To put theory into practice, here are side-by-side samples showcasing each camera’s signature strengths:

Nikon Z5 front Nikon Z5 screen back Sony A6700 front Sony A6700 screen back

Recommendations by User Type

• Portrait enthusiast or studio shooter: Nikon Z5 for full-frame quality and pleasing rendering.
• Wildlife or sports photographer: Sony A6700 for aggressive AF tracking and fast burst rates.
• Casual traveler or street photographer: Sony A6700 for portability.
• Hybrid photography/video creator: Sony A6700 with 4K120p video and full articulation.
• Landscape shooter: Nikon Z5 for dynamic range and full sensor coverage.

Additional Technical Nuggets

• Both feature sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization, which has become a game-changer for handheld shooting.
• Nikon’s dual SD card slots appeal to pros who demand fail-safe workflows.
• Sony’s USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface offers impressively fast file transfers.
• Both bodies lack built-in GPS, which might necessitate tethering for geo-tagging.
• Neither camera offers in-body GPS or advanced environmental ruggedness (no freezeproof or crushproof rating), so additional weatherproofing may be needed for serious expeditions.

In Closing: Hands-On Insights

Having wielded both cameras in varied conditions - from breezy mountain tops to dimly lit galleries - my personal preference settles, not surprisingly, on the fit for purpose. The Nikon Z5 makes you feel like a seasoned photographer walking into a classic darkroom (if we still had those), while the Sony A6700 is a fast-moving digital ninja, agile enough to dart through dynamic scenes.

There’s no clear “winner” here - only photographers with different appetites and workflows. Hopefully, this detailed walkthrough illuminates the best choice for your unique photographic journey.

Happy shooting!

Summary Image Gallery for Quick Reference

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. Nikon Z5 front Nikon Z5 screen back Sony A6700 front Sony A6700 screen back

Disclaimer: All views based on extensive hands-on testing, manufacturer specifications, and field experience as of mid-2024. Your mileage may vary depending on shooting conditions and personal preference.