Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-1 was brought out 13 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-1 matches up against the SH-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus SH-3
E-1 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-1
SH-3 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | November 2003 | More recent by 148 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus SH-3
E-1 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 comes with external measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-1 compared to the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e99a/2e99acbcd96dff9d718ec590de6f923009fe31c2" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and SH-3 is 59 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/623fe/623fe846debe2a488d5b0bea4c7700dd0b79a820" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and SH-3.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-1 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-3 will result in greater detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eed6b/eed6b088e8e0ba65fc78ab7701433d674f08b642" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02b87/02b871cde0bd0db478a6421ce0da4d2d93b36c8c" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $579 |