Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VG-160, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-1 was revealed 9 years before the VG-160 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-1 scores against the VG-160 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus VG-160
E-1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-1
VG-160 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | November 2003 | More recent by 98 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VG-160
E-1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-1 has got physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-1 against the VG-160.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and VG-160 is 59 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and VG-160.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus VG-160 will provide more detail because of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 165 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $90 |