Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ95
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS80 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS80 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-300 was released 14 years earlier than the ZS80 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS80 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades vs the ZS80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS80
E-300 | ZS80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Olympus E-300
ZS80 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2005 | More recent by 159 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper display (+906k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS80
E-300 | ZS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS80 has proportions of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 vs the ZS80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and ZS80 is 67 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZS80.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS80 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS80 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DC-TZ95 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2018-02-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 327 gr (0.72 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $800 | $448 |