Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Released February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was introduced 4 years earlier than the SP-620 UZ which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-3 scores against the SP-620 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-3 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-3
SP-620 UZ | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | February 2008 | Newer by 47 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-3 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 enjoys outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-3 and the SP-620 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and SP-620 UZ is 56 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The image here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and SP-620 UZ.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-3 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will resolve greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-02-20 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $670 | $199 |