Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic FS12, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is very similar but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-30 was launched about the same time to the FS12 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-30 matches up vs the FS12 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic FS12
E-30 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-30
FS12 | E-30 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FS12
E-30 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2009 | ![]() | April 2009 | Similar age |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 offers physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-30 against the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf077/cf077dafd69432a1dcec92970d442c156517bd23" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and FS12 is 60 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/333fe/333fe31c2cf811f3df5ad07dd182b5c8904c3177" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and FS12.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same MP but different sensor sizes. The E-30 offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallow DOF simpler.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb729/eb729675f1d34c3fcd775ff228d7790a871b43f2" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65cc6/65cc6eb96d9c8bd333e721790f35393e88c1f8bc" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $228 |