Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Introduced May 2012
- Replaced the Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-30 and Sony HX200V, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-30 was introduced 4 years earlier than the HX200V and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-30 scores against the HX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony HX200V
E-30 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-30
HX200V | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony HX200V
E-30 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 provides external measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-30 and Sony HX200V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-30 versus the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f703c/f703c3910be924bf17f9297f17ec4585ba892195" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and HX200V is 60 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9be9/e9be96a0123f842cbc323ebf1e9fbde66115319b" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and HX200V.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-30 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX200V will provide more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1caa/f1caac25447683babff8fb0bd4573b627f72a0b9" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/503c0/503c0005807fcc2efd4aa025958d7e38a9b8f261" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-03-24 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lb) | 583 grams (1.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | 450 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,299 | $480 |