Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M5, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M5 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-300 was launched 8 years before the E-M5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-300 scores versus the E-M5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus OM-D E-M5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M5
E-300 | E-M5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus E-300
E-M5 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 88 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+476k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M5
E-300 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 has dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the E-M5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157d6/157d67ffbf4010ff0ed0e71a828ea19822e28e0f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-M5 is 67 and 81 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2654/c2654fd2183878c501d7852718d0a3810952d4ab" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-M5.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-M5 to render more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5fd/2c5fd770b44a90f9f752133069b33f2d78c6c92c" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed110/ed11088783d17c3f3866772db80aa0e2bebf9eb0" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2012-04-30 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 425 gr (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 826 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $800 | $799 |