Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97313/9731330fcb04886d79572856af019d157e2f820f" alt="Olympus Stylus 7030 front Olympus Stylus 7030 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju 7030
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and 7030 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and 7030 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 6 years prior to the 7030 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 7030 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 grades against the 7030 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus Stylus 7030. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus 7030
E-300 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Olympus E-300
7030 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 60 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus 7030
E-300 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus 7030 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 vs the 7030.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58f2b/58f2be045ae71964bc7f617673b770c0da501457" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and 7030 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb622/bb622254dfab3dab5e0cc85dd73017d86d1a6af5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and 7030.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus 7030 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/081d3/081d3156a5167fc8e272fc30d0fbbd87a38c7089" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fce25/fce25733eaa282a1a80cd9ca5eadc229cc5487a8" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | mju 7030 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $179 |