Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 8 years earlier than the TG-320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores against the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-320
E-300 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-300
TG-320 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 85 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320
E-300 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 and the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f3ee/4f3eeaf61d2c5026350f452eed0cc0aec9914f4d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c229e/c229eaaaa26fdeb35d36380d2649377f514d2fc9" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and TG-320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-320 will deliver more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ab6/73ab68b1dc4c7ed75b0e29c7a528339cc443b4ae" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2601a/2601ae8f7b243c25849709c788060bbca12bbfaf" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-320 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $800 | $0 |