Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was manufactured 8 years earlier than the TG-320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores against the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-320

 E-300 TG-320 
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-300

 TG-320 E-300 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2005More modern by 85 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320

 E-300 TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 and the TG-320.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TG-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and TG-320.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-320 will deliver more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
48
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
33
resolution is good (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
67
lighter than competition in class (155g)
environment sealing
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse mode
39
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery life (150 per charge)
does not have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
32
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-320
 Olympus E-300Olympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus TG-320
Alternate name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2005-01-10 2012-01-10
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $800 $0