Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-300 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-300
TG-820 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 86 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+896k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 against the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bc9e/4bc9e9e9ee7742c20fd86525c5272cd3646f9c27" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-820 iHS is 67 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ca41/0ca4167111910b4fff1c63ca7f51c13b4ab5da61" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68eff/68eff984a672b45649d0c439ed4c34332d0aa221" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73152/73152e1b466cbacc40f5ffb7e344af327b6c0d88" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $800 | $500 |