Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was unveiled 10 years prior to the ZS35 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-300 matches up against the ZS35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-300 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-300
ZS35 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2005 | More modern by 109 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS35
E-300 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 and the ZS35.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZS35 is 67 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZS35.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS35 will provide extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $800 | $300 |