Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
88 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced January 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS50
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS60, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS60 (18MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS60 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was launched 12 years earlier than the ZS60 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS60 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 matches up against the ZS60 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic ZS60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS60
E-300 | ZS60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS60 over the Olympus E-300
ZS60 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | January 2005 | More modern by 133 months | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper display (+906k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS60
E-300 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS60 has proportions of 112mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic ZS60 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS60.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZS60 is 67 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZS60.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS60 will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 282 gr (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $248 |