Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
55 Features
57 Overall
55
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-F3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was introduced 5 months later than the NEX-C3 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VG-160 matches up versus the NEX-C3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony NEX-C3
| VG-160 | NEX-C3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus VG-160
| NEX-C3 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony NEX-C3
| VG-160 | NEX-C3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | August 2011 | Same age |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 and the NEX-C3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and NEX-C3 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and NEX-C3.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will provide greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-08-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | 400 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $90 | $343 |