Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Announced April 2014
- Earlier Model is Pentax 645D
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax 645Z, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Pro DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and 645Z (Medium format) come with different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-300 was announced 10 years earlier than the 645Z and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-300 scores versus the 645Z in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Pentax 645Z. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax 645Z
E-300 | 645Z |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus E-300
645Z | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2014 | January 2005 | More recent by 112 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.4") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 134k | Clearer screen (+903k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax 645Z
E-300 | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax 645Z has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax 645Z in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 and the 645Z.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and 645Z is 67 and 49 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and 645Z.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Pentax 645Z will render greater detail with its extra 43 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax 645Z |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Pro DSLR |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-04-15 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 8256 x 6192 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 204800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 1550 grams (3.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 101 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Retail cost | $800 | $5,024 |