Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Pentax K-500 front
Portability
64
Imaging
58
Features
70
Overall
62

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Pentax K-500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 51600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
  • Introduced November 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was announced 10 years earlier than the K-500 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-300 scores against the K-500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-500

 E-300 K-500 

Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-300

 K-500 E-300 
IntroducedNovember 2013January 2005Newer by 108 months
Display size3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kCrisper display (+787k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-500

 E-300 K-500 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the K-500.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and K-500 is 67 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and K-500.

As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax K-500 will show greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax K-500 as a Portrait photography camera
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
74
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Pentax K-500 Street photography information
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
68
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
above average high ISO (51,600)
fixed screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Pentax K-500 Sports photography factors
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
72
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (710 shots)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Pentax K-500 Travel photography information
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
67
better than average battery life (710 shots)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Pentax K-500 Landscape photography highlights
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse mode
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Pentax KAF2 mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average high ISO (51,600)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (710 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Pentax K-500 Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
30
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-500
 Olympus E-300Pentax K-500
General Information
Company Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-300 Pentax K-500
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2005-01-10 2013-11-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - PRIME M
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 400 51600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 11
Cross type focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Pentax KAF2
Number of lenses 45 151
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 134 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.61x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 646 grams (1.42 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 79
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 1087
Other
Battery life - 710 images
Battery type - AA
Battery ID - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $800 $600