Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Introduced November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-500 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 10 years earlier than the K-500 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-300 scores against the K-500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-500
E-300 | K-500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-300
K-500 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 108 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-500
E-300 | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") along with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0336a/0336a944a9c8600256515c565880a85d09bdddd7" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and K-500 is 67 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbbfc/cbbfcdd28892187a09adfd86d2c8e20b02beaa90" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and K-500.
As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax K-500 will show greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/859cb/859cb5b4b71bfe7656be5c2e2c6878be924f374e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc0f/4dc0f1bf42079e6816c6fe4aea047fe85825a1f7" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-500 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 51600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 646 grams (1.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 710 images |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $800 | $600 |