Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Launched April 2012
- Old Model is Sigma SD1
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was announced 8 years prior to the SD1 Merrill which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-300 grades vs the SD1 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
E-300 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus E-300
SD1 Merrill | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | January 2005 | More modern by 88 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
E-300 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 comes with physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-300 compared to the SD1 Merrill.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and SD1 Merrill is 67 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will give more detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 45 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 790 grams (1.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $800 | $2,339 |