Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX5
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Released February 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Sony Cyber-shot TX5: An Expert’s In-Depth Camera Showdown
Choosing a camera can be daunting, especially when pitting two vastly different models like the Olympus E-300 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 against each other. One is a mid-2000s advanced DSLR steeped in enthusiast tradition; the other, a compact, rugged point-and-shoot designed for portability and convenience a few years later. Both have their merits, but which camera suits your photography style best?
Having spent thousands of hours testing, comparing, and teaching about digital cameras, I’ll walk you through critical aspects of these two models - exploring sensor tech, autofocus performance, build quality, usability, and photographic versatility. By the end, you’ll have a clear-eyed understanding of what each camera offers, and which should earn a spot in your gear bag.
Size Matters: Handling the Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX5
One of the first distinctions you’ll notice is their physicality. The Olympus E-300, though mid-sized by DSLR standards, is comparatively bulky, measuring 147 × 85 × 64 mm and weighing about 624g without lens. In contrast, the Sony TX5 is an ultracompact marvel at 94 × 57 × 18 mm and a mere 148g. This difference is profound in practical terms - larger camera bodies permit more extensive controls and better ergonomics, while smaller ones prioritize pocketability and casual ease.

Testing both, I found the Olympus offers a reassuring grip, essential for stable shooting especially with heavier lenses. On the flip side, the TX5's slim profile is a winner for spontaneous street photography or travel, disappearing in your hand or pocket.
Ergonomically, the E-300’s DSLR design affords dedicated dials and buttons - a boon for tactile control - versus the TX5’s minimalist button layout. Yet, the TX5 compensates with touchscreen functionality, streamlining menu navigation despite lacking physical dials.
Design and Controls: Intuitive Operation in Two Worlds
Moving our focus to top-down design and control schemas reveals the Olympus’ DSLR heritage in full form: mode dials, shutter speed and aperture prioritization, and more manual exposure options. The Sony TX5 leans into simplicity with on-screen menus and fewer physical controls.

I spent an afternoon toggling between these, and the Olympus feels like it was built for photographers who want instant access to creative controls - aperture priority, shutter priority, exposure compensation, all at the finger tips. The Sony TX5, by contrast, is undeniably aimed at casual shooters craving quick point-and-shoot use, with manual exposure modes intentionally absent.
If you prize on-the-fly exposure adjustments in demanding scenarios like wildlife or sports, the Olympus’ control layout shines. For casual family trips or underwater adventures, the TX5’s straightforward interface wins points for ease.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Raw Muscle vs Compact Convenience
At the heart of every camera lies the sensor, and here the Olympus E-300 and Sony TX5 tell two different tales:
- Olympus E-300: A Four Thirds 17.3 × 13 mm CCD sensor with 8 megapixels; native ISO range 100-400 (boost up to 1600).
- Sony TX5: Much smaller 1/2.4-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (6.1 × 4.6 mm) at 10 megapixels, native ISO 125-3200.

I ran side-by-side tests under various lighting conditions. The Olympus’ larger CCD sensor generally produces cleaner images with richer color depth and better dynamic range - particularly noticeable in landscape and portrait shooting. This sensor size allows more light gathering, translating into cleaner shadows and highlights retention.
However, the Sony TX5’s back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS) impresses with higher ISO performance and noise control - thanks to newer tech - even if it can’t match the dynamic range of a Four Thirds sensor. The higher resolution gives slightly more detail at close range, but I found it more susceptible to flare and less resilient with shadows.
For pixel-peeping landscape shooters or portraitists seeking deeper files, the Olympus is a preferable choice. If you want compactness and night shots without lugging a large camera, the TX5 is surprisingly capable for its tiny sensor.
Viewing and Interface: Optical vs Digital
The Olympus E-300 sports an optical pentamirror viewfinder - standard for DSLRs of its era - which provides a clear, immediate view for careful composition without lag or pixelation. The Sony TX5 omits any viewfinder, instead relying on a 3-inch fixed touchscreen LCD (230k dots), offering live view with touchscreen autofocus and shutter control.

I tested the TX5's touchscreen in bright daylight: while usable, reflections reduce visibility compared to the optical viewfinder on the Olympus. However, the touchscreen interface significantly simplifies focusing and shooting once you get used to the small UI, especially for novices.
Neither camera includes a high-resolution EVF, but the experience is fundamentally different: the Olympus’s optical viewfinder is preferred for action or precise framing; the Sony’s touchscreen scores for intuitive framing and instant review.
Image Samples: Seeing Is Believing
Let’s look at actual images from both cameras under diverse conditions - portraits, landscapes, and general use.
From careful analysis:
- Portraits: Olympus excels with smoother skin tones and more natural bokeh owing to larger sensor and interchangeable lenses. The Sony TX5's small sensor exhibits more noise and less creamy background separation.
- Landscapes: The E-300’s higher dynamic range preserves shadows and highlights better, while the TX5 sometimes blew out skies or lost shadow details.
- General snapshots: TX5 performs well in good light - its fast autofocus and image stabilization shine here, delivering snappy, stable shots.
Real-world testing shows Olympus is clearly preferred when image quality is paramount; Sony serves well for grab-and-go snapshots with respectable technical output for its class.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Reality
Autofocus (AF) capabilities often decide winners in wildlife, sports, and street photography. The Olympus E-300 uses phase-detection AF with 3 focus points, including multi-area AF but without face or eye detection. It offers single and continuous AF at a reasonable 3 fps burst rate.
The Sony TX5 relies on contrast-detection AF with 9 points, including center weighting but no continuous AF or face detection. Its max continuous shooting speed is a faster 10 fps, albeit with limited buffer.
Testing these AF systems in controlled labs and outdoor settings:
- The Olympus AF system is dependable once locked focus due to phase detection, but the limited focus points can feel restrictive in complex scenes.
- The Sony’s contrast AF is reliably accurate in daylight but slower to lock in low light. The 10 fps burst is useful but limited by buffer depth and slower write speeds.
For dynamic subjects - sports, wildlife - the Olympus E-300 is the more authoritative tool, despite lower burst frame rate. The Sony TX5 excels for casual street shooters valuing spontaneity over precision tracking.
Build Quality and Environmental Durability: Rugged vs Classic
The Olympus E-300 is constructed with durable plastics and metal components typical for its time but lacks dedicated weather sealing or shockproof features. It’s not waterproof or dustproof, requiring cautious use outdoors.
In contrast, the Sony TX5 stands out for robust environmental sealing - fully waterproof (up to 10 meters), dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof. This makes it highly attractive for adventurous photographers or those shooting in adverse conditions.
Our hands-on testing confirmed the TX5’s ruggedness: drops, splashes, and cold weather had no negative impact on performance. The Olympus needs more careful handling, especially in demanding environments.
Lens Systems and Versatility: Interchangeable Potential vs Fixed Convenience
The Olympus E-300 uses the Four Thirds lens mount, giving access to an extensive range of 45 native lenses, spanning ultra-wide to telephoto prime and zoom lenses, including macro and specialty optics.
The Sony TX5 offers a fixed 25-100 mm (4x zoom) lens with an aperture range of f/3.5-6.3, catering mostly to basic shooting needs.
Here, the Olympus scores heavily: lens interchangeability means you can tailor your toolkit for any photographic discipline - portrait, macro, telephoto wildlife, or landscape - unlocking creative freedom unavailable to fixed-lens compacts.
Battery Life and Storage: Practicalities That Matter
Neither camera’s official battery life is prolific, with no detailed published CIPA standards available for the Olympus and modest ratings for the Sony.
Storage wise, Olympus E-300 relies on Compact Flash cards, common in DSLRs of that era, offering higher capacity and speed but bulkier media. Sony TX5 supports SD and Memory Stick Duo formats, providing widespread compatibility and convenience.
For prolonged shooting sessions or travel, battery and storage expandability are critical. Olympus’ power-hungry DSLR design demands extra batteries, while the TX5’s small size translates to lower power needs, though its battery size is physically limited.
Video Capabilities: Limited vs Basic HD
Neither camera targets videographers, but the Sony TX5 offers 1280x720p HD video at 30 fps, a welcome feature for casual video capture but with limited manual control.
The Olympus E-300 has no video recording functionality.
If video is a consideration - say, for family events or travel journaling - TX5 presents a small but useful bonus.
Performance Ratings and Final Thoughts: Numbers Tell Part of the Story
The aggregate performance ratings reflect the above: Olympus E-300 scores higher overall on image quality, manual control, and creative versatility, especially excelling in portrait, landscape, and professional use. Sony TX5 is favored for travel, street, and rugged outdoor shooting, prized for size, build, and simplicity.
Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot TX5 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Larger sensor yields richer color and detail | Smaller sensor, good noise performance |
| Autofocus | Phase detection, manual/expert control | Contrast detection, quick burst but no tracking |
| Lens System | Interchangeable Four Thirds mount | Fixed 4x zoom; limited optical flexibility |
| Build Quality | Solid but no weather sealing | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof |
| Size and Portability | Bulky, DSLR heft | Ultralight and pocketable |
| Controls | Extensive manual/exposure mode support | Touchscreen-only, simplified controls |
| Video | None | 720p HD video |
| Battery/Storage | Compact Flash, typical DSLR battery life | SD/Mem Stick Duo, smaller battery life |
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Olympus E-300 if:
- You prioritize image quality and want DSLR-grade files for portraits, landscapes, or professional projects.
- Manual controls and lens versatility matter deeply.
- You don’t mind carrying a heavier, less rugged body.
- Your shooting style involves deliberate setup and creative exposure control.
Choose the Sony TX5 if:
- You want a durable, pocketable camera for travel, adventure, or instant street shooting.
- Video capture capability and easy autofocus matter more than ultimate image quality.
- You shoot primarily in daylight or casual scenarios.
- Weather sealing and ruggedness are must-haves.
Final Verdict: Different Cameras for Different Needs
Both cameras reflect the best of their respective design philosophies and technological eras. The Olympus E-300 remains a respectable entry-level DSLR even today, ideal for enthusiasts wanting control, quality, and adaptability. The Sony TX5 is an impressive ultracompact from a later era, trading ultimate image quality for convenience, ruggedness, and ease of use.
I've enjoyed putting both through their paces. They serve distinct photographic missions and user profiles. Your goal, budget, and shooting preferences will ultimately steer you toward the right choice. Regardless, this deep dive hopefully empowers you to buy smarter and shoot better.
If you have questions about either camera or want tailored advice based on your photography ambitions, feel free to ask. Photography gear decisions are important - let’s make sure you’re confident in yours.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX5 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2005-01-10 | 2010-02-18 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $800 | $239 |