Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Renewed by Sony WX350
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WX300 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was launched 9 years earlier than the WX300 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-300 matches up versus the WX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony WX300

 E-300 WX300 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus E-300

 WX300 E-300 
RevealedFebruary 2013January 2005More recent by 98 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kCrisper screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony WX300

 E-300 WX300 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has got external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 versus the WX300.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and WX300 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The graphic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and WX300.

To sum up, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony WX300 will give more detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX300 Portrait photography highlights
48
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
36
decent megapixels (18MP)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Sony WX300 Street photography advice
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (166 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Sony WX300 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
49
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Sony WX300 Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
MP count low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
lighter than average in class (166g)
decent megapixels (18MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony WX300
43
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
44
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Sony WX300
9
can't record video
35
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (166 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony WX300
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2005-01-10 2013-02-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-500mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-6.5
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 134k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 166g (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $800 $330