Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus VG-120 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-450
Olympus VG-120
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview

Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-330 was revealed 5 years prior to the VG-120 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-330 matches up against the VG-120 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VG-120

 E-330 VG-120 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-330

 VG-120 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2011March 2006Fresher by 58 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-120

 E-330 VG-120 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 comes with physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus VG-120 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 compared to the VG-120.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and VG-120 is 65 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and VG-120.

All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-120 will offer extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VG-120 Portrait photography factors
54
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
MP count low (7 megapixels)
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Olympus VG-120
60
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Olympus VG-120 Sports photography advice
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
26
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery power (160 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Olympus VG-120 Travel photography features
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (7 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
62
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery power (160 per charge)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus VG-120
45
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
36
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low battery power (160 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging advice
Olympus VG-120 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
28
really wide (26mm)
supports face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-120
 Olympus E-330Olympus VG-120
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus VG-120
Other name EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Revealed 2006-03-18 2011-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing range - 7cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.40 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 120 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $1,100 $190