Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-330 was revealed 5 years prior to the VG-120 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-330 matches up against the VG-120 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Olympus VG-120. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VG-120
E-330 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-330
VG-120 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 58 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-120
E-330 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 comes with physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus VG-120 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 compared to the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bdc2/0bdc23bbbdcb70e8bbe2391918add97778c631be" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and VG-120 is 65 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fa80/2fa80a89ee49060590d1aa83b1bb092f8917e3eb" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and VG-120.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-120 will offer extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a186/7a18641e3c6590503adfe391aeceb027356a3575" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf0d3/cf0d3123b85a1e90f8bbd12379fd979e51284388" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus VG-120 |
Other name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 160 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $190 |