Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-330 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the FX580 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-330 matches up vs the FX580 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FX580
| E-330 | FX580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-330
| FX580 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2009 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 34 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX580
| E-330 | FX580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 offers external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Panasonic FX580 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-330 compared to the FX580.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FX580 is 65 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and FX580.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FX580 will deliver more detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $499 |