Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-330 was released 3 years after the SD9 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-330 grades against the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Sigma SD9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sigma SD9
| E-330 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2006 |  | November 2002 | Newer by 41 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Screen resolution | 215k |  | 130k | Crisper screen (+85k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-330
| SD9 | E-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sigma SD9
| E-330 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has got external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 versus the SD9.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and SD9 is 65 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-330 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern E-330 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-330 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sigma SD9 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of display | 215k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $3,001 |
