Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
56
Features
57
Overall
56

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-3
  • Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was introduced 6 years before the NEX-C3 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 matches up against the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-C3

 E-330 NEX-C3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-330

 NEX-C3 E-330 
IntroducedAugust 2011March 2006Fresher by 66 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kClearer screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3

 E-330 NEX-C3 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 versus the NEX-C3.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and NEX-C3 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and NEX-C3.

As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will offer you greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Sony NEX-C3 Portrait photography advice
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low MP (7 megapixels)
73
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Street photography camera
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
79
tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (225 grams)
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography highlights
Sony NEX-C3 Sports photography highlights
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
53
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (400 per charge)
slow fps (6.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition (616g)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
low MP (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
good battery power (400 shots)
lighter than competition (225g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography information
Sony NEX-C3 Landscape photography information
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Time Lapse function
70
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (400 shots)
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony NEX-C3
9
no video
27
lighter than competition (225 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3
 Olympus E-330Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-03-18 2011-08-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 225g (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 1083
Other
Battery life - 400 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $1,100 $343