Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 6 years before the NEX-C3 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 matches up against the NEX-C3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony NEX-C3
E-330 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-330
NEX-C3 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 66 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3
E-330 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 versus the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71f15/71f15627a25dd3ba1724124d5b42b997a4a2d89a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and NEX-C3 is 65 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b572/1b57289aff2022f2504d226657a621766f365ed1" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and NEX-C3.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will offer you greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3dd/ab3dda92d568e603ab2d1fa3ae1f907bd887b7fe" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c57/86c57380619b8cf2e15e61bd2c18d929462c158c" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 45 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $1,100 | $343 |