Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-330 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-330 scores versus the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony T900
E-330 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-330
T900 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | March 2006 | More modern by 35 months | |
Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 215k | Clearer display (+707k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900
E-330 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 and the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and T900 is 65 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and T900.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony T900 will produce greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,100 | $300 |