Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Overview

Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-330 scores versus the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony T900

 E-330 T900 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-330

 T900 E-330 
IntroducedFebruary 2009March 2006More modern by 35 months
Display dimension3.5"2.5"Larger display (+1")
Display resolution922k215kClearer display (+707k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900

 E-330 T900 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 offers physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 and the T900.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and T900 is 65 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and T900.

Clearly, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-330 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony T900 will produce greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony T900 as a Portrait photography camera
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low MP (7MP)
27
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
60
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography info
Sony T900 Sports photography info
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Sony T900
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
low MP (7 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
52
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography advice
Sony T900 Landscape photography advice
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse function
37
focusing manually
very good size screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging highlights
Sony T900 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
28
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony T900
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2006-03-18 2009-02-17
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lbs) 143 gr (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $1,100 $300